Writing Intercultural History of Christian Mission of the 19th and 20th Century: Concepts, Methods, and Politics. Reflections on a conception of an intercultural historiography of Christian mission in reference to postcolonial studies and critical whitene

我们应该如何理解安德烈亚斯？内林在经历了一段“使命历史的终结”之后提出的挑衅性问题，我们应该如何回应？！该项目的重点是如何将19世纪和20世纪的传教士史学概念化，以避免一种(新)殖民主义历史主义，这种历史主义是在19世纪发展起来的，并一直影响到我们的21世纪。国际、教派间和跨文化研究网络指的是不同地区，以及参与者所代表的全球视角下的跨文化史学概念。他们是根据他们带来的不同忏悔、文化和政治身份而被挑选出来的。“跨文化使命史”史学的某些概念是时间和空间现实过程的结果。他们体会到个人和社会团体的经验宗教活动，由16位联网同事自己反映和解读。这项任务将把16位学术人士(世界各地的研究经验)联系在一起，他们是各大学院系的经验丰富的成员，习惯于某些不同的史学概念，在他们的地理研究和个案研究领域以及他们对跨文化使团历史的宗派表述上各不相同。该项目的想法是利用这些，并在概念上将它们在元水平上结合在这个学术网络的跨大陆/跨区域和跨学科的联合企业中。该项目由来自大陆、国家、基督教教派和特定史学概念的16位“基督教过去和存在的历史学家”代表。焦点：我们如何才能理解“跨文化神学”在20世纪70年代首次概念化的定义和发展，并更全面地实施和发展？目标：我们通过各种跨文化影响的方法和子概念来重新定义传教士史学的传统概念，我们希望通过采用跨学科的视角来获得这些概念，以便在适当的时候应用它们。其结果是：我们将为学生和教师制作一本“手册”，它将提供基督教传道史学的可能性的例子，他们的机会和各自的局限性所在。什么方法可以用来批判性地阅读和解释别人记录的《19世纪和20世纪基督教传教史》？它的踪迹应该如何追溯？

How shall we understand the critical of Andreas Nehring with his provoking question after an "end of mission history" and how should we react on it?! The project focuses on the question of how to conceptualize missionary historiography in the 19th and 20th centuries in order to avoid a (neo-)colonizing historicism that was developed in the 19th century and, influentially, has continued well into our 21st century. The international, interdenominational and intercultural research network refers to different regions and to concepts of intercultural historiography in a global perspective, which are represented by the participants. They were selected on the basis of the different confessional, cultural and political identities they bring with them. The certain concepts of a historiography of "intercultural mission history" is the result of processes in the reality of times and spaces. They are realizing experienced religious activities of individuals and social groups, reflected, and interpreted by the 16 networking colleagues themselves. The task will be to link together the 16 academic personalities (worldwide research-experiences), who are experienced members of various university faculties, used to certain different historiographical concepts, varying in their geographical fields of research and case-studies, and in their denominational expressions of an Intercultural History of Mission. The projects’ idea is to make use of these and bring them conceptionally together on a meta-level in a transcontinental / transregional and interdisciplinary joint venture of this academic network. The project is represented by 16 "historians of Christian past and presence" of various continental, national, Christian denominational, and specific historiographical concepts of research. The focus: How can we understand "intercultural theology" in relation to the definition and development of its first conceptualization in the 1970s and implement and develop it more comprehensively? The objective: We "re-define" the traditional concept of missionary historiography through various interculturally influenced methods and sub-concepts, which we want to acquire by adopting interdisciplinary perspectives in order to apply them where appropriate. The result: We will produce a "handbook" for students and teachers that will provide examples of the possibilities of the historiography of Christian mission, where their opportunities and respective limitations lie. What methods could be used to critically read and interpret the "History of Christian missions in the 19th and 20th centuries" recorded by others? How should ist trail be retraced?