权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Discourse Construction Process in Contact Situations between Native and Non-native Japanese Speakers

日语母语者与非母语者接触情境中的话语建构过程

基本信息

批准号：
09834004
负责人：
KASHIMA Megumi
金额：
$ 1.41万
依托单位：
Mie University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1997
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1997 至 1999
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

In this research, we attempt to examine the process as to how the mutual discourse between the pairs of NS (Native Japanese Speaker) and NNS (Non-Native Japanese Speaker) will come to be recognized, constructed and established in a task oriented experimentation in 'Direction-giving'. For constrastive analysis, three contact situations and one native speakers situation have been set up.(1) Explainer : NNS (Advanced Japanese Learner) vs. Explainee : NS(2) Explainer : NS vs. Explainee : NNS (Advanced Japanese Learner)(3) Explainer : NNS (basic Japanese Learner) vs. Explainee : NS(4) NS vs. NSTo start with, enforced the experimentation by each 10 pairs as four situations as above. All of the subjects'discourse has been recorded in audio tapes and MD discs. Next, we have transcribed the audio data by the system of Du bois et al. (1992, 1993) and stored it as data base.In discourse analysis, we aim to come at a dynamic character of the process, not a statistic one, which is changing momentarily by the recognition and interaction between NS and NNS. The findings of this investigation have been published in journals as below mentioned.Murakami (1997) has observed communication troubles for a factor of low communication effect in contact situations, and pointed out three kinds of conflicts of cognitive frames between NS and NNS. Murakami (1998) has showed two kinds of reference-point functions in 'Direction-Giving'and the differences based on explainer's cognition of the map diagram. She has described also the relationship of those functions and expression types. Murakami (1999) has focus on the solution strategies for getting over communication conflicts. Two types of solution strategies have been Identified, and the negotiation process has been described. Kashima M. (1999) has focus on the frames of spatial reference in 'Direction-Giving', and pointed out four types of its expression forms.

在本研究中，我们试图探讨的过程中，作为对NS（母语为日本语的人）和NNS（非母语为日本语的人）之间的相互话语将被识别，构建和建立在一个任务为导向的实验中的“指示”。为了进行实证分析，我们设置了三个接触情境和一个本族语者情境。(1)解释者：NNS（高级日语学习者）vs.被解释者：NS（2）解释者：NS vs.被解释者：NNS（高级日语学习者）（3）解释者：NNS（基础日语学习者）vs.被解释者：NS（4）NS vs. NS所有被试的话语都被录制在录音带和MD光盘中。在语篇分析中，我们的目标是通过对名词和名词之间的识别和相互作用来获得一个动态的过程，而不是一个统计的过程。Murakami（1997）将交际困难作为交际效果低下的一个因素进行了观察，并指出了NS和NNS之间认知框架的三种冲突。Murakami（1998）在“方向给定”中指出了两种参考点函数，并根据解释者对地图图形的认知给出了它们的区别。她还描述了这些功能和表达类型的关系。Murakami（1999）研究了克服交际冲突的策略。确定了两种类型的解决策略，并描述了谈判过程。鹿岛（1999）对“定向”中的空间参照框架进行了研究，指出了其四种表现形式。