The Transformation in Shrine Appearence from the policy of Shinto-Buddhist Separation.

作为神教-佛教分离政策的一个例子，分别审议了1609年和1667年出云大沙神社(平川县岛根县大沙镇)的两个重组项目。早期是神道教和佛教共同学习的时期，而后者是分离的时期。通过对两个历史阶段的神社的比较，本研究明确了神社的社会背景。研究发现：关于建国后(1609)的出云大沙：1)中世纪末已经引入的佛室(林佐)、三层宝塔(三州)、大乘佛殿(大一道)和钟楼(短屋)，都存在于遗址上。2)神社的大殿(洪登)，不像古代的结构特征，具有很强的装饰性，并具有明显的佛教建筑影响。1667年日本菅直人改制后的出云泰沙：1)日本神社(Kanbu…)更多的重组开始于宏安(自战国时代以来活跃在这类项目中的佛教僧侣)、Kokuzoke(神社大祭司)和松江县省政府之间的合作努力。最初并没有将神道和佛教建筑分开的意图。2)神社最初的规划具有特定的佛教特征，因此，将神道和佛教建筑分开的意图并不明显。3)神佛分离政策在1668年洪安被解散后开始影响神社的规划，当时该项目由神社和松江汉省官员单独管理。5)由于有意将神道和佛教建筑分开，以及“回归传统风格”，神社的主要冰雹最终呈现出强烈的线形结构和简单的设计。神道和佛教分离的景观：1)最初，Kokuzoke大祭司和洪安之间的摩擦并不明显。在所有权经济权利和重组项目的领导地位上出现了分歧。2)由于需要幕府的许可和松江汉的大力支持，松江道知事直佐任命黑泽浩田为省级儒学学者教师，建议进行反佛教、神道和儒家的共修。3)虽然神道和佛教分离政策的核心是一场古代复兴的运动，但后神社结构是一种摆脱所有佛教影响的拙劣尝试，有点效仿其前身建国的设计。较少

As an example of the Shinto-Buddhist separation policy, the case of two restructuring projects at Izumo Taisha shrine (Shimane Pref., Hikawa County, Taisha Town) in the years 1609 and 1667, were respectively considered. The earlier period was a time of co-learning between Shinto and Buddhism while the later was a time of separation. Through a comparison of the shrine at both stages of history, the social background was clarified in this study.Findings :Concerning Izumo Taisha after the Kencho restructuring (1609) :1) Having already been introduced by the end of the medieval age, a sutra chamber (rinzo), a three-storied pagoda (sanju noto), a Mahavairocana hail (dainichi-do), and a bell house (shoro), three Buddhist structures, all existed on the site.2) The shrine's main hall (honden), not resembling ancient structural characteristics, had strong decorations and possesed clearly Buddhist architectural influence.Concerning Izumo Taisha after the Kanbun restructuring (1667) :1) The Kanbu … More n restructuring began as a cooperative effort between Hongan (Buddhist monk active in such projects since the Age of Warring States), Kokuzoke (shrine high priest), and the provincial government of Matsue-han. There was initially no intent to separate Shinto and Buddhist architecture.2) The original shogunal plan for the shrine had specific Buddhist characteristics, therefore, an intent to separate Shinto and Buddhism architecture is not evident.3) Shinto-Buddhist separation policy began to affect the shrine's plan after the dismissal of Hongan in 1668, when the project was administered by the shrine and Matsue-han provincial officials alone.5) Resulting from intentional separation of Shinto and Buddhist architecture, as well as a "return to traditional styles, " the shrine's main hail finally exhibited strong lineal structures and a simple design.The landscape of Shinto-Buddhist separation :1) Initially, the friction between the high priest Kokuzoke and Hongan was not apparent. Problems arose with disagreement over proprietary economic rights and the directorship of the restructuring project..2) Requiring the permission of the shogunate and the strong support of Matsue-han to carry out Shinto Buddhist separation, Matsue-han governor, Matsudaira Naomasa, appointed Kurosawa Hirotada as provincial scholar-teacher of Confucianism, recommending an anti-Buddhist, Shinto-Confucian co-cultivation.3) While, at the heart of the Shinto-Buddhist separation policy was a movement toward ancient revival, the post-Kanbun shrine structure was a poor attempt at throwing off all Buddhist influence, somewhat following in design of its Kencho predecessor. Less