权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Empirical study of the funding system for academic research activities in Japan

日本学术研究活动资助制度的实证研究

基本信息

批准号：
09400006
负责人：
YAMAMOTO Shin'ichi
金额：
--
依托单位：
University of Tsukuba
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
1997
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1997 至 1999
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

In this research project, structure and dynamic of academic research activity is discussed first. Based on the discussion, questionnaire is designed, which is constitute of, 1. details of joint-study group and type of research activities, 2. latest academic environment and the degree of insufficiency of resources, 3. scale and type of research grant required and type of research project planned, 4. effects of the additional input of academic resources on the quality and the quantity of the outcome, 5. academic outcome of this three years, 6. availability of the objective evaluation of the academic research activities and subjective evaluation of the type of academic outcome, and 7. facesheet.10600 samples of university professor and associate professor from six groups of University in Japan are chosen randomly and questionnairpackage was sent. During the survey period from November 1998 to January 1999, 3075 questionnaires were returned.Main findings from the analysis of this data are as follows,1) Correlations of the total budget for academic research between 1995, 1996 and 1997 are very high. In addition, the extent of space and the grade of laboratory equipment are also highly correlated to total budget for academic research. Therefore, it is hypothesized that resources for academic research activity are distributed concentratedly.2) about the relation between total input and outcome of academic research activities, it is thought that 1. some lowest level (threshold) seems to exist for good outcome, and 2. additional input of academic resources produce better results in proportion, and 3. another level of the ceiling exist where the outcome of research activities stops growing.3) the fact from this data is that in general, the better the total academic environment is, the better the degree of academic outcome is. For detailed study, method of measuring academic environment and outcome must be improved.

本研究首先探讨了学术研究活动的结构和动力。在此基础上，设计了问卷调查表，问卷内容包括：1.联合研究小组的详细情况和研究活动的类型，2.最新的学术环境和资源不足的程度，3。所需研究补助金的规模和类型以及计划的研究项目的类型，4.学术资源的额外投入对成果质量和数量的影响; 5.这三年的学术成果，6。学术研究活动的客观评价和学术成果类型的主观评价的有效性;随机抽取日本六所大学的教授和副教授共10600名样本，并发送电子邮件包。在1998年11月至1999年1月的调查期间，共收回了3075份问卷，对这些数据进行分析的主要结果如下：1）1995年、1996年和1997年的学术研究总预算之间的相关性很高。此外，空间的大小和实验室设备的等级也与学术研究的总预算高度相关。因此，本文假设学术研究活动的资源是集中分布的。2）关于学术研究活动的总投入与产出的关系，本文认为：1。一些最低水平（阈值）似乎存在良好的结果，和2。学术资源的额外投入在比例上产生更好的效果;另一个上限存在于研究活动成果停止增长的地方。3）从这个数据中可以看出，一般来说，总体学术环境越好，学术成果的程度就越好。为了更深入地研究，必须改进学术环境和学术成果的测量方法。