PLEDGE: Politics of Grievance and Democratic Governance
PLEDGE: Politics of Grievance and Democratic Governance
批准号:
10105080
负责人:
金额:
$19.32万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
EU-Funded
财政年份:
2024
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2024 至 --
中文摘要
当代政治是愤怒和复仇的,情感两极分化和毫不妥协的对立对欧洲民主国家及其治理构成了重大挑战。承诺将政治不满解释为不满、沮丧和不安全感的情感信号,这些信号可能会发展为反民主或亲民主的结果。通过参与有学者、政策制定者、民间社会行为者和公民参与的合作研究设计和实施,认捐项目旨在提供对反民主和支持民主的政治不满轨迹的新理解,并共同创建在情感上明智和顺应民情的民主治理和政策沟通的工具和做法,以促进民主形式的公民参与。该项目将提供反民主和亲民主申诉政治的情感机制框架,解释公民和群体的情感、价值观和身份认同之间的动态相互关系,并从经验上将这些情感机制的心理、社会文化和政治驱动因素解码为可操作的措施和指标,重点关注11个国家和3个主要危机(大流行、乌克兰战争、气候/能源危机)。承诺将通过一个涉及15个合作伙伴的跨国家跨学科研究项目实现这些目标,其政策成果将在设计联盟中共同创建和试点,将为进程和实践的民主创新提供信息,并将情感纳入为设计的结果,从而提高其效率
英文摘要
Contemporary politicsis angry and vengeful, with affective polarization and uncompromising antagonisms posing a significant challenge for European democracies and their governance. PLEDGE interprets political grievances as emotional signals of disaffection, frustration and insecurities that can develop into either anti- or prodemocratic outcomes. By engaging in collaborative research design and implementation involving academics, policy-makers, civil society actors, and citizens, the PLEDGE project intends to offer new understanding of anti- and pro-democratic trajectories of political grievances, and to co-create tools and practices of emotionally intelligent and responsive democratic governance and policy communication that promote prodemocratic forms of civic engagement. The project will provide a framework of the emotional mechanisms of anti- and prodemocratic grievance politics that explain dynamic interrelations between the emotions, values, and identities of citizens and groups, and empirically decode the psychological, sociocultural, and political drivers of these emotional mechanisms into operationalizable measures and indicators, focusing on 11 countries and 3 major crises (pandemic, war in Ukraine, climate/energy crisis). PLEDGE will achieve these objectives through a cross-national interdisciplinary research project involving 15 partners and its policy outputs, co-created and piloted in design coalitions, will inform democratic innovation of processes and practices and incorporate emotionsin the designed-for outcomes, thusimproving their efficiency
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金