Determining whether TMS changes the brain through brain synaptic plasticity

确定 TMS 是否通过大脑突触可塑性改变大脑

• 批准号: 10548183
• 负责人: Joshua C Brown
• 金额: $ 12.14万
• 依托单位: BUTLER HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI)
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2019
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2019-03-01 至 2025-01-31
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10548183
• 关键词: Acids; Address; Affect; Anatomy; Animals; Brain; Brain Diseases; Centers of Research Excellence; Clinical; Cognition; Disease; Electromyography; Electrophysiology (science); Explosion; Frequencies; Glutamates; Learning; Location; Long-Term Depression; Long-Term Potentiation; Motor Cortex; Motor Evoked Potentials; N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors; Neurons; Outcome; Pattern; Physiologic pulse; Process; Research; Residencies; Series; Synaptic plasticity; Therapeutic; Time; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Treatment Protocols; Width; Work; cell type; experimental study; human subject; nerve supply; neurobiological mechanism; neuropsychiatry; neuroregulation; pharmacologic

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has transformed the approach to neuropsychiatric illness although many limitations remain. Without a mechanistic understanding of how TMS produces lasting therapeutic changes in the brain, advances will be serendipitous and TMS will only reach a fraction of its potential. There are unlimited combinations of parameters possible in TMS including stimulation intensity, frequency, pulse width, time on and off, patterns, and anatomic location. Moreover, the way each of these parameters affect the brain will change based on brain location, regional cell types, circuits and activity patterns specific to each disorder, and brain state will all determine outcome. It is therefore essential to establish the basic mechanism of TMS effects, so that the explosion of clinically-orientated, hypothesis-driven research will have a mechanistic rationale. Building on the extensive animal work in synaptic plasticity, I will bridge the basic neurobiological mechanisms of learning and cognition learned in my dissertation with the translational work of TMS I have learned during residency to address the major gap in TMS research: how does it produce lasting therapeutic changes in the brain? A mechanistic approach to this question remains essentially untested. I hypothesize that excitatory TMS (including high-frequency repetitive (r)TMS and intermittent theta-burst stimulation (TBS)) induces long-term potentiation (LTP), and inhibitory TMS (including low-frequency rTMS and continuous TBS) induces long-term depression (LTD). Both of these processes depend on neuronal and NMDA receptor activity, and both are under the influence of inhibitory gamma-aminobutryric acid (GABA) innervation. I propose a series of experiments in healthy human subjects combining pharmacologic manipulation of the LTP and LTD cascades with TMS treatment protocols to the motor cortex. Electrophysiologic approaches assessing motor evoked potentials (MEPs) with electromyography (EMG) will allow further elucidation of the contribution of glutamatergic versus GABAergic inputs, and will directly impact stimulation strategies. A mechanistic understanding of TMS-induced changes to the brain could unleash its full therapeutic potential, and thereby, transform the treatment of brain disorders.

经颅磁刺激（TMS）改变了神经精神疾病的治疗方法 尽管仍然存在许多限制。如果不机械地了解TMS如何产生持久的 在大脑的治疗变化，进步将是偶然的，TMS将只达到其一小部分， 潜力在TMS中可能存在无限制的参数组合，包括刺激强度， 频率、脉冲宽度、开和关时间、模式和解剖位置。此外，每一种方式 影响大脑的参数将根据大脑位置、区域细胞类型、回路和活动而变化 每种疾病的特定模式和大脑状态都将决定结果。因此必须 建立TMS效应的基本机制，使临床导向的爆炸， 假设驱动的研究将具有机械原理。 在突触可塑性的广泛动物研究的基础上，我将在基本的神经生物学方面建立桥梁。 学习和认知的机制，在我的论文与TMS的翻译工作，我有 在住院期间学到的解决TMS研究的主要差距：它如何产生持久的 大脑的治疗变化对这一问题的机械方法基本上还没有经过检验。我 假设兴奋性TMS（包括高频重复性TMS和间歇性θ-爆发 刺激（TBS））诱导长时程增强（LTP）和抑制性TMS（包括低频TMS）。 rTMS和连续TBS）诱导长期抑郁（LTD）。这两个过程都依赖于 神经元和NMDA受体活性，两者都受到抑制性γ-氨基丁酸的影响 酸（GABA）神经支配。 我建议在健康人中进行一系列实验， LTP和LTD级联与TMS治疗方案的运动皮层。电生理 用肌电图（EMG）评估运动诱发电位（MEP）的方法将允许进一步的 阐明谷氨酸能与GABA能输入的贡献，并将直接影响 激励策略。对TMS引起的大脑变化的机械理解可能会释放出 它的全部治疗潜力，从而改变大脑疾病的治疗。