Carolingian Politics
Carolingian Politics
批准号:
AH/I002464/1
负责人:
Stuart Airlie
金额:
$2.84万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Fellowship
财政年份:
2011
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2011 至 --
关键词:
中文摘要
从751年到888年,加洛林王朝统治着西欧,其最伟大的统治者查理曼的声誉几代人困扰着欧洲人的想象力。751年,查理曼的父亲皮平三世从贵族阶层晋升为国王,并建立了王室血统。公元888年,这条路线失去了排他性,非加洛林式的小国王在法兰克世界如雨后春笋般涌现。这本书与近期其他有关卡罗林人的杰出著作不同:它涵盖了加洛林专属统治的整个时期;它关注的是中心而不是地区;它认为,这个世界与其说是由共识监管的,不如说是一个强有力地断言一种独特的无懈可击的权威的世界:王室本身的特殊地位。在751年至888年期间,加洛林王室是那个时代的决定性机构,这本书探索了加洛林王室如何成功地从贵族队伍过渡到皇室的崇高地位,一个多世纪以来,加洛林王室一直小心翼翼地成功地守护着这一地位。但维护这一地位是一项无休止的任务;王朝不能放松;它的特殊地位必须不断地阐明和宣布。辩称王室本身是王国中最重要的机构,因为它赋予了王国特定的身份,这并不是说这个世界是原始的、世袭的和简单的。相反,这个家庭在其世界中普遍存在的复杂和创造性的方式证明了加洛林政治文化的政治创造力。这是一个家庭,作为一个机构,不断地以各种方式履行其身份。伟大的国王和他们的战争、集会、宝藏和宫殿是最熟悉的人物,但他们只是更大的皇家演员阵容的一部分。年幼的孩子在定义、传播和表演法兰克皇室的非凡魅力方面发挥了关键作用;坚韧的武士带着加洛林女婴的洗礼披肩一路来到罗马;一个年轻的男孩从巴伐利亚州的宫殿窗户意外坠落,引发了当代对这个王朝黯淡前景的反思。王室成员的生命周期为政治设定了节奏。所有这一切都在王国的大宫殿和圣地中展示和表演。王室家谱的复制证明了人们对加洛林过去的特殊性和隐含的未来的信念。这本书将对这种做法的分析与对那个时期政治冲突的调查结合在一起。这类冲突,从817年意大利的伯纳德起义到87年代从秃头查尔斯的儿子卡洛曼手中剥夺了他的加洛林身份,都改变了该王朝成员的地位。事实上,卡罗莱纳人太成功地让他们的世界相信他们是特别的。贵族们接受了各种不满和被边缘化的加洛林家族成员的主张,结果是虔诚的路易(814-840)和他的继任者试图更狭隘地定义他们的家庭,但最终失败了,因为这正是加洛林王朝的优势所在:它独特的魅力。
英文摘要
The Carolingian dynasty dominated western Europe from 751 to 888 and the reputation of its greatest ruler, Charlemagne, haunted European imaginations for generations. In 751, Charlemagne's father, Pippin III, rose from the ranks of the aristocracy to become king and found a royal line. In 888, that line lost its exclusivity and non-Carolingian 'kinglets' sprang up in the Frankish world. This book differs from other distinguished recent work on the Carolingians: it covers the whole period of exclusive Carolingian rule; it focuses on centres rather than regions; and it argues that this was less a world regulated by consensus than one characterised by the vigorous assertion of a distinctive form of unassailable authority: the special status of the royal family itself. That period of 751 to 888 had the Carolingian royal family as the defining institution of its age, and this book explores how it triumphantly negotiated its transition from the ranks of the aristocracy to the exalted status of royalty, a status that it guarded jealously and succesfully for over a century. But guarding that status was an endless task; the dynasty could not relax; its special status had to be constantly articulated and proclaimed. To argue that the royal family was itself the most important institution in the realm, because it gave that realm its specific identity, is not to argue that this world was 'primitive', patrimonial and simple. On the contrary, the complex and creative ways in which this family made itself universally present in its world testify to the political creativity of Carolingian political culture. This was a family as an institution that constantly performed its identity in a variety of ways. The great kings and their wars, assemblies, treasures and palaces are the most familiar figures buth they were only part of a much larger royal cast. Young children played key roles in defining, broadcasting and performing the charismatic specialness of Frankish royalty; tough warriors carried the baptismal shawl of an infant Carolingian girl all the way to Rome; the accidental fall of a young roayl boy from a palace window in Bavaria triggered contemporary reflections on the gloomy prospects of the dynasty. The life-cycle of the royals set the pace for politics. And all this was displayed and performed in the great palaces and sacred places of the realm. The copying of royal genealogies testified to belief in the specialness of the Carolingian past, and an implied future. This book combines analysis of such practices with survey of the political conflicts of the period. Such conflicts, ranging from, e.g., the revolt of Bernard of Italy in 817 to the stripping of his Carolingian identity from Carloman, son of Charles the Bald in the 870s, turned on the status of the dynasty's members. In fact, the Carolingians were too successful in convincing their world that they were special. The aristocracy accepted the claims of a variety of discontented and marginalised Carolingian family members with the result that attempts by Louis the Pious (814-840) and his successors to define their family more narrowly foundered on the very feature that was the dynasty's strength: its unique charisma.
期刊论文(1)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Carolingian Politics
加洛林政治
DOI:
--
发表时间:
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Airlie, S.]
通讯作者:
Airlie, S.
海外基金