权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Competition Litigation Across the EU 1999-2009: A comparative Analysis, Focusing on Consumer Redress

1999-2009 年欧盟竞争诉讼：比较分析，重点关注消费者赔偿

基本信息

批准号：
AH/I00338X/1
负责人：
Barry James Rodger
金额：
$ 13.56万
依托单位：
University of Strathclyde
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2012
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2012 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FI00338X%2F1
关键词：
Competition Litigation Across EU 1999

项目摘要

This project concerns the application of competition law in the national courts of the EU Member States. Competition law seeks to regulate the market behaviour of businesses, for instance by prohibiting the abuse of monopoly power and the creation of cartels. A typical price-fixing cartel involves collusion between would-be competitors who agree to fix prices at levels above the competitive price, making excessive profits at the expense of consumers and society generally. EU and UK competition law have traditionally been enforced virtually exclusively by an administrative body, for instance by the imposition of considerable fines. These fines do not compensate directly any of the victims of the competition law infringements. The historical primacy of administrative enforcement in Europe is in stark contrast with US competition law ('antitrust law') where private enforcement constitutes the vast majority of antitrust enforcement. The availability of a well-developed system of class actions has ensured that private enforcement is extremely effective and can result in end-consumers being compensated for their losses. The US system emphasises the importance of consumer rights, an aspect which appears to be lacking in the EU. A Commission White Paper published in April 2008 made a number of interesting proposals to facilitate and harmonise competition litigation across the Community. Reform of the UK system was also proposed by the OFT in its 2007 Recommendations, not as yet implemented. Both sets of proposals in particular consider ways of faciltating consumer redress.There has been to date no comprehensive or systematic study of the case-law in which competition law issues have arisen in private litigation across the Member State legal systems, and this project will fill this lacuna. The project will be collaborative, with rapporteurs for each EU Member State and expert economic and comparative legal input. Each rapporteur will identify and provide details of all competition law cases before Member State courts over a period of ten years, in order to provide a comprehensive analysis of all competition law-related private litigation across the EU. This will allow for a clearer and fuller understanding of the obstacles to effective private enforcement, particularly in relation to consumers, and encourage learning and sharing of best practice. A recent cut-off point is necessary, and as Regulation 1/2003 came into force on 1 May 2004, and sought to enhance the role of the national courts in EU competition law enforcement, the intention is to consider all cases within the five year period either side of this date, i.e. 1 May 1999-30 April 2009. An economic overview of differences in procedural rules from an incentives perspective and a comparative review of differences in legal systems, litigation behaviour and other independent variables in a number of States will help us understand the legal context in which private enforcement exists, how it has been constrained and may be facilitated.This is a vitally important period for this research to be undertaken and disseminated, as private enforcement is viewed by competition authorities and practitioners as a key element of a more competitive UK and European economy. The proposed research will inform ongoing policy debates at the EU and UK following the Commission White Paper and OFT recommendations, which suggested ways of facilitating private competition litigation and access to justice for consumers. The research will thus be of value to academics, practitioners, the judiciary, consumer organisations, business, policy makers and public enforcement agencies. DG Competition of the European Commission and the UK Office of Fair Trading have indicated their strong support for the proposed research, and it will allow the OFT to learn from developments in other Member States to enhance access to justice, the competition litigation system, and indirectly competitiveness, in the UK.

该项目涉及竞争法在欧盟成员国国家法院的适用问题。竞争法旨在规范企业的市场行为，例如禁止滥用垄断权和建立卡特尔。典型的价格操纵卡特尔涉及潜在竞争对手之间的串通，这些潜在竞争对手同意将价格设定在高于竞争性价格的水平，以牺牲消费者和整个社会的利益为代价，赚取过高的利润。欧盟和英国的竞争法传统上几乎完全由一个行政机构执行，例如通过征收巨额罚款。这些罚款并不直接赔偿任何违反竞争法行为的受害者。欧洲行政执法在历史上的至高无上地位与美国竞争法(反垄断法)形成鲜明对比，在美国，私人执法占反垄断执法的绝大多数。完善的集体诉讼制度确保了私人执法非常有效，并可导致最终消费者获得损失赔偿。美国的制度强调消费者权利的重要性，而欧盟似乎缺乏这一方面。2008年4月发表的一份委员会白皮书提出了一些有趣的建议，以促进和协调整个社区的竞争诉讼。OFT在其2007年的建议中也提出了对英国体制的改革，但尚未实施。这两套提案都特别考虑了便利消费者救济的方法。迄今为止，还没有全面或系统地研究在成员国法律体系的私人诉讼中出现竞争法问题的判例法，这个项目将填补这一空白。该项目将是协作的，每个欧盟成员国都有报告员，并有经济和比较法律方面的专家意见。每位报告员将确定并提供成员国法院在十年期间审理的所有竞争法案件的细节，以便全面分析整个欧盟范围内所有与竞争法有关的私人诉讼。这将有助于更清楚和更全面地了解有效的私人执法的障碍，特别是与消费者有关的障碍，并鼓励学习和分享最佳做法。1/2003号条例于2004年5月1日生效，旨在加强国家法院在欧盟竞争执法中的作用，其目的是在这一日期的任何一方，即1999年5月1日至2009年4月30日的五年期间内审议所有案件。从激励的角度对程序规则的差异进行经济概述，并对一些国家的法律制度、诉讼行为和其他独立变量的差异进行比较审查，将有助于我们了解私人执行存在的法律背景，它是如何受到限制和可能得到便利的。这是开展和传播这项研究的一个至关重要的时期，因为竞争主管机构和从业人员将私人执行视为英国和欧洲更具竞争力的经济的关键要素。在欧盟委员会白皮书和OFT建议之后，拟议的研究将为欧盟和英国正在进行的政策辩论提供信息，这些建议建议了促进私人竞争诉讼和消费者诉诸司法的方法。因此，这项研究将对学者、从业者、司法机构、消费者组织、企业、政策制定者和公共执法机构具有价值。欧盟委员会竞争事务办公室和英国公平贸易办公室已表示强烈支持拟议的研究，这将使OFT能够学习其他成员国的发展，以加强英国的司法途径、竞争诉讼制度，并间接提高竞争力。