课题基金 / 基金详情

Transdisciplinarity and the Humanities: Problems, Methods, Histories, Concepts

Transdisciplinarity and the Humanities: Problems, Methods, Histories, Concepts
跨学科与人文学科:问题、方法、历史、概念
批准号:
AH/I004378/1
负责人:
Peter Osborne
金额:
$20.41万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Research Grant
财政年份:
2011
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2011 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

Peter Osborne的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
In the late twentieth century, the humanities in the English-speaking world were transformed by the reception of types of French and German philosophy and critical theory that, in one way or another, work across the boundaries of existing disciplines. However, this reception took place in a range of specific disciplinary contexts (especially English literary studies), isolated from the consideration of the nature and innovative potential of the 'transdisciplinarity' of these works. This project is a theoretical investigation into the way certain concepts - for example, art, gender and the new - function across disciplinary borders in the humanitiesResearch contextExplicit discourses about 'transdisciplinarity' have recently been developed in both Science and Technology Studies and Education Studies. However, these are primarily focused on technological approaches to problem solving (in everyday and policy contexts) and the social organization of knowledges. In neither instance has the idea been connected up to developments in the humanities since the 1960s, or to issues of a fundamental theoretical character about the unity of the humanities as body of knowledge and practice (or the unity of 'the human' itself). Traditionally, philosophy has conceived of itself as providing the forms of universality that span other disciplines. However, for reasons of its analytical formation, English-language philosophy has shown little interest in the question of the status, character and modes of functioning of general concepts across disciplines in the humanities. This is, however, a characteristic of philosophical Romanticism. The study of transdisciplinarity in the humanities must thus address both the existing literature on transdisciplinarity in other areas and the question of the relationship of transdisciplinary concepts to philosophical concepts, historically and analytically - through a new approach to the legacy of philosophical Romanticism.Aims and objectivesThis project aims to address the basic questions: What is transdisciplinarity in the humanities? And to what extent and in what ways is the creativity of a concept linked to its transdisciplinary construction, application or potential? It has among its objectives: 1) the production of case studies, and critical and comparative analyses, of the transdisciplinary structures and dynamics of one major, philosophically informed transdisciplinary text from each of the German and French critical traditions - books which have had a significant impact on recent English-language work. We propose to compare Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944; 1947) and Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's two-volume work comprising Anti-Oedipus (1972) and A Thousand Plateaus (1980). 2) the production of case studies of two transdisciplinary 'problematics' (or fields of problems): anti-humanism and gender study. 3) The exploration of a distinctively 'Romantic' transdisciplinarity, through a retrospective investigation of the transdisciplinary dynamics of early German Romanticism (1785-1800), including analyses of the function of the general categories of 'art' and 'the new'.Potential applications and benefitsThe theoretical breadth of this project and its diverse case studies mean that it should be of interest to a very broad constituency of academics and others in the arts concerned with what is currently thought of as 'interdisciplinary' studies in the humanities. It aims to reorient this field away from the more conservative notion of interdisciplinarity towards the open, more experimental field of transdisciplinary constructions. As such, it should also be of benefit to those in Science and Technology Studies and Education Studies who use the existing discourse of 'transdisciplinarity', by its criticisms of it and its extension beyond its current limits.
期刊论文(10)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Foucault's Point of Heresy: 'Quasi-Transcendentals' and the Transdisciplinary Function of the Episteme
福柯的异端观点:“准先验论”与认识论的跨学科功能
DOI: 10.1177/0263276415592036
发表时间: 2015
期刊: Theory, Culture & Society
影响因子: --
作者: [Balibar É]
通讯作者: Balibar É
Temporal Drag: Transdisciplinarity and the 'Case' of Psychosocial Studies
时间拖累:跨学科性和心理社会研究的“案例”
DOI: 10.1177/0263276415592039
发表时间: 2015
期刊: Theory, Culture & Society
影响因子: --
作者: [Baraitser L]
通讯作者: Baraitser L
Romantic Bureacracy
浪漫的官僚主义
DOI: --
发表时间: 2016
期刊: Radical Philosophy
影响因子: 0.9
作者: [Boris Groys]
通讯作者: Boris Groys
Logics of Generalization: Derrida, Grammatology and Transdisciplinarity
泛化逻辑:德里达、语法学和跨学科性
DOI: 10.1177/0263276415592037
发表时间: 2015
期刊: Theory, Culture & Society
影响因子: --
作者: [Cunningham D]
通讯作者: Cunningham D
10
    Innovation Launchpad Network AFS
    • 批准号:
      EP/X528493/1
    • 项目类别:
      Research Grant
    • 资助金额:
      $249.74万
    • 财政年份:
      2022
    • 负责人:
      Peter Osborne
    • 依托单位:
    Innovation Launchpad Network
    • 批准号:
      EP/W037009/1
    • 项目类别:
      Research Grant
    • 资助金额:
      $621.93万
    • 财政年份:
      2022
    • 负责人:
      Peter Osborne
    • 依托单位:
    海外基金