权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Connecting Communities to the Nation: Review of the Relationships between Local Communities and National Policy Systems

连接社区与国家：回顾地方社区与国家政策体系之间的关系

基本信息

批准号：
AH/J50126X/1
负责人：
Martin Laffin
金额：
$ 3.53万
依托单位：
Durham University
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2011
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2011 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FJ50126X%2F1
关键词：
Connecting Communities Nation Review Relationships

项目摘要

The framework outlined reflects the realities of service delivery for the purposes of research and to assist practitioners to reflect on their policy context. The evidence indicates that service delivery remains predominantly vertical, connecting the centre and the locality, while the recently much touted horizontal, 'cross-cutting' links across services remain underdeveloped. The framework hinges on the key point that local discretion must be understood as a function not only of the freedom enjoyed by those within a service delivery chain but also of their ability to influence national policies which determine how those chains work. The framework has three components:(1) service delivery chains are characterised by tensions over how problems should be defined or understood, how specific policy frameworks should be and how (and why) providers are subject to multiple, and often competing, accountabilities. These chains are also associated with:(2) mechanisms of representation which refer to the ways in which some stakeholders are recognised as 'representative' and formally integrated in the policy process, and others excluded, and by(3) routes to influence which are available to those seeking to influence the policy settings and operation of the chain, or even resist change.

概述的框架反映了为进行研究和协助从业人员反思其政策背景而提供服务的现实情况。证据表明，服务的提供仍然主要是垂直的，连接着中心和地方，而最近备受吹捧的跨服务的横向“交叉”联系仍然不发达。该框架的关键在于，必须将地方自由裁量权不仅理解为服务提供链中的人所享有的自由的一种职能，而且理解为他们影响决定这些链如何运作的国家政策的能力的一种职能。该框架有三个组成部分：(1)服务提供链的特点是，应如何定义或理解问题、政策框架应如何具体以及服务提供者如何(以及为什么)接受多个往往相互竞争的责任。这些链还与：(2)代表机制，指的是某些利益攸关方被承认为“代表”并被正式纳入政策进程的方式，以及其他利益攸关方被排除在外的方式，以及(3)那些试图影响链的政策设置和运作，甚至抵制变革的人可以利用的影响途径。