权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A feminist international law of peace and security

女权主义国际和平与安全法

基本信息

批准号：
AH/R007306/1
负责人：
Christine Chinkin
金额：
$ 93.15万
依托单位：
London School of Economics and Political Science
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2018
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2018 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FR007306%2F1
关键词：
feminist international law peace security

项目摘要

This project develops the theoretical foundations and normative content of an international law that can more effectively deliver on gender equality and sustainable peace. For over a century, these two goals have defined the women's peace movement and, as early as 1915, activists were calling on states to recognize that neither equality nor peace could be fully secured without acknowledging the intimate relationship between the two. In the aftermath of WWII states sought to advance these goals but through parallel international law projects starting with the adoption of the UN Charter in 1945 and the Universal Declaration of Human Right in 1948. Notwithstanding a plethora of efforts, progress over the last seven decades on both fronts has been patchy and partial. Across the globe, equality is far from being realized and measures to prevent conflict have all too often failed.In 2000, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1325 when, at long last, states formally acknowledged the link between the two objectives and, in doing so, founded the UN's Women, Peace and Security Agenda (WPS Agenda). In the intervening 17 years, the Council has adopted a further seven resolutions leading to significant advances on some fronts, most notably, international action to tackle sexual violence in armed conflict. However, women's groups and scholars are increasingly doubtful that the potential for transformative change and radical reform as originally envisaged by Resolution 1325 will materialize. This scepticism is due to a number of reasons including the ambiguity of the texts of the resolutions and a lack of political commitment. The very fact that states regard the WPS agenda as a set of policy objectives rather than as a political framework founded on legal obligations means that progress is likely to be slow at best. Our project addresses these two core problems by elaborating on the legal content of the agenda. In that process, we will pave the way for what we ambitiously describe as a 'feminist international law of peace and security'. In short, this proposal represents the initial stage of a long-term vision that builds on the legacies of the past to develop the foundations and content of a feminist international law of peace and security that offers an alternative gender-sensitive account of international law that can make a real and lasting difference to the lives of women, not least those in conflict affected zones.The project is divided into two inter-related research streams. The first focuses on the conceptual and normative ambiguities of the WPS agenda and interrogates our understandings of 'peace' and 'security' through different disciplines and traditions to craft an enriched feminist reading of what is implicated by both concepts under international law. In the second stream we turn our attention to the notion of conflict prevention and ask whether a feminist international law would open up the possibilities for a broader understanding of conflict prevention thereby providing a normative framework that more effectively delivers on prevention. Over the 3 year project cycle, we will undertake desk-based and archival research, convene workshops involving a wide range of stakeholders, including scholars from other disciplines and policy-makers and -shapers at domestic and international levels and convene a WPS Global Congress. Our dissemination strategy has been planned to maximize the impact of our findings and to reach the widest possible audience, not least women's groups operating in conflict-affected regions. We will created a one-stop global resource hub that will host our research outputs including articles for an academic audience; reports and briefing papers to assist policy-makers develop law and policies with transformative potential; advocacy and litigation tools aimed at further empowering women's groups; and comments and blogs for all audiences including, importantly, the general public.

该项目发展了能够更有效地实现性别平等和可持续和平的国际法的理论基础和规范内容。一个多世纪以来，这两个目标定义了妇女和平运动，早在1915年，活动家们就呼吁各国认识到，如果不承认平等与和平之间的亲密关系，就无法完全确保平等与和平。二战结束后，各国试图推进这些目标，但通过平行的国际法项目，从1945年通过《联合国宪章》和1948年通过《世界人权宣言》开始。尽管做出了大量的努力，但在过去70年里，这两个方面的进展都是不完整和不全面的。在全球范围内，平等远未实现，防止冲突的措施往往失败。2000年，联合国安理会通过了第1325号决议，各国终于正式承认了这两个目标之间的联系，并由此创立了联合国妇女、和平与安全议程（WPS议程）。在过去的17年中，安理会又通过了7项决议，导致在某些方面取得重大进展，其中最引人注目的是采取国际行动解决武装冲突中的性暴力问题。然而，妇女团体和学者越来越怀疑第1325号决议最初设想的变革和彻底改革的潜力是否会实现。这种怀疑是由于若干原因造成的，包括决议案文含糊不清和缺乏政治承诺。各国将WPS议程视为一套政策目标，而不是建立在法律义务基础上的政治框架，这一事实本身就意味着，进展至多可能是缓慢的。我们的项目通过阐述议程的法律内容来解决这两个核心问题。在这个过程中，我们将为我们雄心勃勃地描述为“女权主义的国际和平与安全法”铺平道路。简而言之，这项建议代表了一项长期愿景的初始阶段，该愿景以过去的遗产为基础，发展女权主义的和平与安全国际法的基础和内容，为国际法提供另一种对性别问题敏感的解释，可以对妇女的生活，尤其是受冲突影响地区的妇女的生活产生真正和持久的影响。该项目分为两个相互关联的研究方向。第一部分侧重于WPS议程的概念和规范的模糊性，并通过不同的学科和传统询问我们对“和平”和“安全”的理解，以在国际法下对这两个概念所涉及的内容进行丰富的女权主义解读。在第二个流中，我们将注意力转向预防冲突的概念，并询问女权主义国际法是否会为更广泛地理解预防冲突开辟可能性，从而提供一个更有效地提供预防的规范性框架。在3年的项目周期内，我们将开展桌面研究和档案研究，召集包括其他学科学者、国内外政策制定者和影响者在内的广泛利益相关者参加的研讨会，并召开一次WPS全球大会。我们制定的传播战略是为了最大限度地扩大我们的调查结果的影响，并尽可能广泛地接触到读者，尤其是在受冲突影响地区开展活动的妇女团体。我们将建立一个一站式的全球资源中心，以容纳我们的研究成果，包括学术读者的文章；协助决策者制定具有变革潜力的法律和政策的报告和简报；旨在进一步增强妇女群体权能的宣传和诉讼工具；以及所有观众的评论和博客，重要的是，包括普通公众。