权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Empowering Brazil's impoverished communities through critical decision-making. A communitarian communicative strategy

通过关键决策为巴西贫困社区赋权。

基本信息

批准号：
AH/V007025/1
负责人：
Claudia Angelelli
金额：
$ 15.96万
依托单位：
Heriot-Watt University
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2020
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2020 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FV007025%2F1
关键词：
Empowering Brazil impoverished communities through

项目摘要

Communicating effectively, understanding and being understood, prioritizing essential information, or differentiating between reliable and fake news, require cognitive and social skills learnt through socialization and education. These skills are not equal across social sectors (Freire 1992:71), but are essential because we depend on accessing, analysing and categorizing information to make informed decisions. They are particularly important when living through the current pandemic. In Brazil, an ODA country of 210 million people, a quarter of the population lives below the poverty line, experiencing not only the direct effects of the virus infection, but also the impact from the disorganization of underfunded health services and social insecurity. Additionally, local efforts to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 are hindered by fake news (Ricard & Medeiros 2020). This phenomenon begs the questions of how fake news impacts vulnerable groups shaping their perception of the pandemic, and how communication is used by the pandemic-response networks to support mitigation strategies. This interdisciplinary project falls within the remit of AHRC/GCRF by bringing Language, Culture, and Intercultural Communication together with Development Studies, Gamification and Healthcare. Grounded in Paolo Freire's philosophy of education and framed by theories from sociolinguistics, specifically in critical language awareness (Fairclough 1995), discourse and power (Van Dick 2003 & 2009), access to education and information through family literacy practices (Rogers 2003), and access to healthcare (Angelelli 2004), this project focusses on vulnerable groups in deprived metropolitan areas and their access to information, communication and decision-making in relation to COVID-19.Researchers and professionals from various disciplines (languages, culture, critical discourse, gamification, intercultural communication, communities and society, nursing and social care) work together to benefit vulnerable groups at higher risk, i.e. homeless, Favelas dwellers, and garbage pickers in cooperatives in Goiânia (state of Goiás). Given our team's previous experiences with these communities and the trust gained, we are in the unique position to access the sites where we can study this phenomenon and bring creative and innovative ways to empower the most vulnerable sectors of the population. Conducting this research is imperative because the results will support and inform local efforts to control the pandemic, such as the plan of action of the social and technical-scientific network (FIOCRUZ) and CUFA (Central Unica de Favelas) to confront COVID-19 in slums. We believe the time has come to conduct this research and to implement our strategies before COVID-19 claims even more lives among these neglected and vulnerable groups.ReferencesAngelelli, C. (2004). Medical Interpreting and Cross-cultural Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. The critical study of language. Essex: Longman.Freire, P. (1992). Pedagogy of Hope. London/New York: Continuum.Ricard, J., Medeiros, J., (2020). Using misinformation as a political weapon: COVID-19 and Bolsonaro in Brazil, The Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 1(2), 1-6.Rogers, R. (2003). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Family Literacy Practices- Power In and Out of Print. New Jersey: Lawfrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Van Dijk, T. (2003). Elite Discourse and Racism. Sage Publications.Van Dijk. T. (2009). Racism and Discourse in Latin America. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.

有效沟通，理解和被理解，优先考虑重要信息，或区分可靠和假新闻，需要通过社交和教育学习认知和社交技能。这些技能在社会各部门并不平等（Freire 1992：71），但却至关重要，因为我们依赖于对信息的获取、分析和分类来做出知情的决定。在经历目前的大流行病时，这些措施尤其重要。在巴西这个拥有2.1亿人口的官方发展援助国家，四分之一的人口生活在贫困线以下，不仅受到病毒感染的直接影响，而且还受到资金不足的保健服务混乱和社会不安全的影响。此外，当地减轻COVID-19影响的努力受到假新闻的阻碍（Ricard & Medeiros 2020）。这一现象引出了以下问题：假新闻如何影响弱势群体塑造他们对流行病的看法，以及流行病应对网络如何利用传播来支持缓解战略。这一跨学科项目福尔斯属于澳大利亚人权委员会/全球儿童基金会的职权范围，将语言、文化和跨文化交流与发展研究、游戏化和保健结合在一起。以保罗·弗莱雷的教育哲学为基础，以社会语言学的理论为框架，特别是批判性语言意识（Fairclough 1995）话语与权力（货车迪克，2003年和2009年），通过家庭扫盲活动获得教育和信息（Rogers 2003），以及获得医疗保健（Angelelli，2004年），该项目侧重于贫困大都市地区的弱势群体及其获取信息的机会，来自不同学科的研究人员和专业人士（语言、文化、批判性话语、游戏化、跨文化交流、社区和社会、护理和社会关怀）共同努力，使无家可归者、贫民窟居民等风险较高的弱势群体受益，在戈亚斯州戈亚尼亚，鉴于我们的团队以前在这些社区的经验和所获得的信任，我们处于独特的地位，可以访问网站，在那里我们可以研究这一现象，并带来创造性和创新性的方法，以增强人口中最脆弱群体的权能。开展这项研究势在必行，因为研究结果将支持和指导当地控制疫情的努力，例如社会和技术科学网络（FIOCRUZ）和CUFA（Central Unica de Favelas）在贫民窟应对COVID-19的行动计划。我们相信，在COVID-19在这些被忽视的弱势群体中夺走更多生命之前，是时候进行这项研究并实施我们的战略了。（2004年）。医学口译与跨文化交际。剑桥桥：剑桥大学出版社。（1995年）。批评性话语分析对语言的批判性研究。埃塞克斯：Longman.Freire，P.（1992）.希望的教育学伦敦/纽约：连续体。Medeiros，J.，（2020年）。使用错误信息作为政治武器：COVID-19和Bolsonaro in Brazil，The哈佛肯尼迪学院（HKS）Misinformation Review，1（2），1- 6。（2003年）的报告。家庭识字实践的批评性话语分析--印刷和绝版的权力。新泽西州：劳伦斯·埃尔鲍姆联合公司。（2003年）的报告。精英话语与种族主义Sage出版社货车Dijk T.（2009年）。拉丁美洲的种族主义和话语。普利茅斯，英国：列克星敦图书。