VOICES: The Value of Openness, Inclusion, Communication, and Engagement for Science in a post-pandemic world

声音：大流行后世界中科学的开放、包容、沟通和参与的价值

• 批准号: AH/X001415/1
• 负责人: Stephen Pinfield
• 金额: $ 31.94万
• 依托单位: University of Sheffield
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2022
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2022 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FX001415%2F1
• 关键词: VOICES; Value; Openness; Inclusion; Communication

While the coronavirus pandemic's impacts have been largely negative, and in many instances catastrophic, Covid-19 also served to bring about some positive changes in the way we carry out, communicate, and engage with science. More research has been shared openly, with a progressive increase in the use of preprints, research data sharing, and public communication of science, particularly in mainstream media. These changes have the potential to foster a more open and inclusive approach to research and scholarship and to bolster our capacity to face present and future societal challenges - but only if the changes persist beyond the pandemic. To better understand the long-term impacts of this shift for a more resilient and informed society, this project seeks to investigate and share new empirical evidence of the value of opening science, to other scholars and to the public, during and beyond the pandemic. It brings together a transnational team of scholars with complementary expertise in open science, scholarly and science communication, and research impact, to examine three main questions in the context of the pandemic and post-pandemic period: 1) How is the value of open science discussed and positioned? 2) Who adopted or contributed to open science practices and how? and 3) How has the relationship between research and the public been affected by the opening of research? Using a novel theoretical framework that considers open research and public science communication as interconnected along a continuum of access, this transnational team will employ a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods from social and information sciences to demonstrate the long-term value of openness, inclusion, and equity in the communication of science, while warning against any barriers and pernicious effects.

虽然冠状病毒大流行的影响在很大程度上是负面的，在许多情况下是灾难性的，但Covid-19也为我们开展、交流和参与科学的方式带来了一些积极的变化。随着预印本的使用、研究数据共享和科学的公共传播（特别是在主流媒体上）的逐步增加，更多的研究已被公开分享。这些变化有可能促进更加开放和包容的研究和学术方法，并增强我们面对当前和未来社会挑战的能力——但前提是这些变化在大流行之后持续存在。为了更好地了解这一转变对更具复原力和知情程度的社会的长期影响，该项目力求调查并向其他学者和公众分享在大流行期间和之后开放科学的价值的新经验证据。它汇集了一个在开放科学、学术和科学传播以及研究影响方面具有互补专业知识的跨国学者团队，在大流行和大流行后时期的背景下研究三个主要问题：1)如何讨论和定位开放科学的价值？谁采用或贡献了开放科学实践？如何采用或贡献？3)研究开放对科研与公众的关系产生了怎样的影响？这个跨国团队采用了一种新颖的理论框架，认为开放研究和公共科学传播是相互关联的，沿着连续的获取途径，这个理论框架将采用社会科学和信息科学的定量和定性方法相结合，来展示科学传播中开放、包容和公平的长期价值，同时警告任何障碍和有害影响。

项目成果

The neglect of equity and inclusion in open science policies of Europe and the Americas

欧洲和美洲开放科学政策忽视公平和包容

• DOI: 10.1590/scielopreprints.7366
• 发表时间: 2023
• 作者: Chtena N

Making science public: a review of journalists' use of Open Access research.

• DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.133710.1
• 发表时间: 2023
• 期刊: F1000Research

The pandemic has brought opportunities for greater inclusion in science: A thematic analysis of documents on open science practices

这场流行病为科学的更大包容性带来了机会：对开放科学实践文件的专题分析

• DOI: 10.20396/rdbci.v21i00.8673918/32387
• 发表时间: 2023
• 期刊: RDBCI-REVISTA DIGITAL DE BIBLIOTECONOMIA E CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO
• 作者: Oliveira Monique

Open data journalism: A narrative synthesis of how, when, and why data journalists use open data sources

开放数据新闻：关于数据记者如何、何时以及为何使用开放数据源的叙述性综合

• DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/wh8jx
• 发表时间: 2023
• 作者: Fleerackers A

The impact of COVID-19 on the debate on open science: An analysis of expert opinion

COVID-19 对开放科学辩论的影响：专家意见分析

• DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/xy874
• 发表时间: 2024
• 作者: Marshall M