SPEECH CHARACTERISTICS IN CORONARY HEART DISEASE

冠心病的言语特征

• 批准号: 3345902
• 负责人: LARRY W SCHERWITZ
• 金额: $ 13.05万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 1984
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 1984-12-01 至 1986-11-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/3345902
• 关键词: aggression; behavior test; behavioral medicine; cardiovascular disorder epidemiology; cardiovascular disorder prevention; coronary disorder; data collection methodology /evaluation; disease /disorder proneness /risk; goal oriented behavior; interview; male; prognosis; psycholinguistics; psychological stressor; self concept; social competition; stress; type A /type B personality

The objectives are to improve the assessment of psychosocial risk factors for coronary heart disease, including Type A behavior, hostility, and self-involvement. The specific aims are: 1) to describe and compare interviewer stylistics of two prospective epidemiological studies, the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) and Western Collaborative Group Study (WCCS) Structured Interviews, 2) to assess whether there are interviewer differences in the predictiveness of Type A behavior and its components for CHD incidence in the MRFIT and WCGS, and 3) if so, to assess whether these interviewer differences in CHD predictiveness are related to interviewer stylistics. The aims are being achieved by auditing and analyzing detailed interviewer speech characteristics from the WCGS and the MRFIT. The audits are being conducted on tape-recorded Structured Interviews on all CHD cases, and each CHD case is matched with CHD-free control subjects, totalling 750 from the WCGS and 577 from the MRFIT. Each speech characteristic has been scored with high reliability, and the sample sizes are adequate for the analyses. Appropriate multiple logistic regression analyses are being used to control for standard risk factors. The significance of the study will allow us to assess whether the SI interviewing style has changed substantially from the WCGS to the MRFIT, and if so, whether these changes may have reduced the predictive validity of behavior type judgments.

目标是改进对心理社会风险因素的评估 冠心病，包括A型行为，敌意， 自我介入 具体目的是：1）描述和比较采访者的文体特征 在两项前瞻性流行病学研究中， 干预试验（MRFIT）和西方协作组研究（WCCS） 结构化面试，2）评估是否有面试官 A型行为及其组成部分的预测性差异， MRFIT和WCGS中的CHD发病率，以及3）如果是，评估这些 冠心病预测能力的访谈者差异与访谈者 文体学 通过对访谈者的详细审核和分析，达到了目的 来自WCGS和MRFIT的语音特征。 审计工作正在 对所有冠心病病例进行录音结构化访谈， 冠心病病例与非冠心病对照组相匹配，共750例。 WCGS和MRFIT的577。 每个语音特征都被评分 可靠性高，样本量足以进行分析。 适当的多元逻辑回归分析被用来控制 标准风险因素。 这项研究的重要性将使我们能够评估SI是否 从WCGS到MRFIT，面试风格发生了很大变化， 如果是，这些变化是否降低了预测的有效性 行为类型的判断。