Law, Localism & Governance

法律、地方主义

基本信息

  • 批准号:
    ES/J004642/2
  • 负责人:
  • 金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 依托单位:
  • 依托单位国家:
    英国
  • 项目类别:
    Fellowship
  • 财政年份:
    2012
  • 资助国家:
    英国
  • 起止时间:
    2012 至 无数据
  • 项目状态:
    已结题

项目摘要

'I have 3 very clear priorities: localism, and we'll weave that into everything we do from parks to finance to policy. My second priority is localism, and my third is ... localism' (Eric Pickles, Minister for Communities and Local Government, June 2010). There can be can no doubt that the current Government aim to increase the ability of local communities to make decisions for themselves. The Localism Bill of 2010 currently making its way through Parliament promises to give communities 'a right to challenge' the ways in which public services are currently provided, a 'right to buy' community assets if they are threatened with closure and a 'right to build' if sufficient votes can be gathered in local referenda. There is no legal definition of 'the local' in the 2010 Bill, the concept is assumed to be widely understood. As it stands, community based localism appears primarily to be aimed at devolution to the grass roots, empowering local democracy, particularly in land use terms at the neighbourhood scale. This research project will consider how law can define and promote 'the local' to supplement and at times challenge conventional understandings of local government. It has two key strands of investigation. The first is to ask whether localities can ever be sufficiently separate to justify wholly local-decision making. Legally, localities must still abide by national, EU and international law, protecting habitats or human rights, for example or engaging in transparent procurement practices or ensuring that highways run smoothly from one locality to the next. In the Ealing comedy, A Passport to Pimlico, it was evident that a locality could not secede for long. Places and people are closely connected. Yet localism invokes a boundary, both geographic and legal, distinguishing between an inside and an outside, with people either 'in' or 'out'. This is a familiar experience for many. School catchment areas, primary care trusts and local authorities can all offer very different services either side of this dividing line. We are familiar with 'post code lotteries' but rarely comfortable with the stark divisions they can produce. If localism now devolves still further to the 'micro-local' scale, distinguishing between neighbourhoods or parish councils, will this mean that those willing to sit in meetings at 7pm on a cold November night can make binding decisions affecting all residents? Or will localism exist in name only with local authorities or other regulators still required to resolve disputes both within and between localities? The second strand of localism this research project will investigate is whether the machinery of localism (neighbourhood planning, local policing, GP commissioning or urban regeneration projects) that facilitate local democracy and autonomy, will in fact allow volunteers and a 'coalition of the willing' to decide what their locality should be like, both in terms of development (new houses or industrial opportunities) or behaviour (music deemed anti-social in a 'family neighbourhood' may not for example be inappropriate in a block of student flats). Since both poverty and wealth are closely correlated with place, will local-decision-making exclude the wrong type of resident, be they students, commuters or the poor? This research fellowship aims to investigate both these sets of questions by asking whether legal understandings of the local are procedurally and substantively just. The research will be explicitly cross-disciplinary in law and geography and will work with residential communities to investigate how residents, neighbourhoods and local authorities use legal mechanisms to define and implement localism and the local on the ground. The project also aims to connect academia with practice, establishing a network and a blog to ensure that scholars, from all disciplines, are engaging with policy analysts, regulators, local authorities and service users on a regular and consistent basis.
我有三个非常明确的优先事项:地方主义,我们将把它融入我们所做的一切,从公园到金融到政策。我的第二优先是地方主义,第三优先是...地方主义“(Eric Pickles,社区和地方政府部长,2010年6月)。毫无疑问,本届政府的目标是提高地方社区自主决策的能力。2010年的地方主义法案目前正在议会审议,该法案承诺给予社区"挑战“目前提供公共服务的方式的权利,如果社区资产受到关闭的威胁,则”有权购买“社区资产,如果在地方公民投票中能够获得足够的选票,则”有权建设“。2010年法案中没有“当地人”的法律的定义,假设这个概念被广泛理解。目前,以社区为基础的地方主义似乎主要是为了向基层下放权力,增强地方民主,特别是在邻里规模的土地使用方面。这个研究项目将考虑法律如何定义和促进“地方”,以补充和有时挑战传统的地方政府的理解。它有两个关键的调查线索。第一个问题是,地方是否能够充分分离,以证明完全由地方决策是合理的。从法律上讲,地方仍然必须遵守国家、欧盟和国际法律,例如保护栖息地或人权,或采取透明的采购做法,或确保从一个地方到另一个地方的高速公路畅通。在伊灵喜剧《皮姆利科的护照》中,很明显,一个地方不可能长期脱离联邦。地方和人紧密相连。然而,地方主义援引了一个地理和法律的边界,区分了内部和外部,人们要么“进来”,要么“出去”。这对许多人来说是一种熟悉的经历。学校服务区、初级保健信托基金和地方当局都可以在这条分界线的两侧提供非常不同的服务。我们熟悉“邮政编码彩票”,但很少对它们所能产生的鲜明分歧感到满意。如果地方主义现在进一步下放到“微观地方”规模,区分社区或教区议会,这是否意味着那些愿意在11月寒冷的夜晚7点开会的人可以做出影响所有居民的具有约束力的决定?还是地方主义将名存实亡,地方当局或其他监管机构仍需解决地方内部和地方之间的纠纷?本研究项目将调查的地方主义的第二个方面是,地方主义的机制是否(邻里规划,当地治安,GP委托或城市再生项目),促进地方民主和自治,事实上将允许志愿者和“意愿联盟”决定他们的地方应该是什么样的,无论是在发展方面(新房子或工业机会)还是在行为方面(例如,在“家庭邻里”中被认为是反社会的音乐在学生公寓楼中可能并不合适)。由于贫富都与地方密切相关,地方决策是否会排除错误类型的居民,无论是学生、通勤者还是穷人?这项研究奖学金旨在调查这两组问题,询问当地的法律的理解是否在程序上和实质上是公正的。这项研究将是明确的跨学科的法律和地理,并将与居民社区合作,调查居民,邻里和地方当局如何使用法律的机制,以确定和实施地方主义和当地的地面。该项目还旨在将学术界与实践联系起来,建立一个网络和一个博客,以确保来自所有学科的学者定期和一致地与政策分析人员、监管机构、地方当局和服务用户接触。

项目成果

期刊论文数量(4)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
Routledge Handbook of Socio-Legal Theory and Methods
劳特利奇社会法律理论与方法手册
  • DOI:
    10.4324/9780429952814
  • 发表时间:
    2019
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Creutzfeldt N
  • 通讯作者:
    Creutzfeldt N
Law and localism: the case of multiple occupancy housing
  • DOI:
    10.1111/j.1748-121x.2012.00229.x
  • 发表时间:
    2012-01
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0.7
  • 作者:
    A. Layard
  • 通讯作者:
    A. Layard
Privatising land in England
英国土地私有化
There are eight million stories in The Naked City
《裸体城市》有八百万个故事
{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

Antonia Layard其他文献

What does a just transition mean for urban biodiversity? Insights from three cities globally
公正的转变对城市生物多样性意味着什么?
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
    2024
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    3.5
  • 作者:
    Leslie Mabon;Antonia Layard;Laura De Vito;Roger Few;Sophia Hatzisavvidou;O. Selomane;Adam P. Marshall;Gilles Marciniak;Hannah Moersberger
  • 通讯作者:
    Hannah Moersberger

Antonia Layard的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

{{ truncateString('Antonia Layard', 18)}}的其他基金

Ways of neighbourhood working and knowing
邻里工作和了解的方式
  • 批准号:
    ES/M00239X/1
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Law, Localism & Governance
法律、地方主义
  • 批准号:
    ES/J004642/3
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Fellowship
Law, Localism & Governance
法律、地方主义
  • 批准号:
    ES/J004642/1
  • 财政年份:
    2012
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Fellowship
Localism, Narrative and Myth
地方主义、叙事与神话
  • 批准号:
    AH/J006602/1
  • 财政年份:
    2012
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Localism, Narrative and Myth
地方主义、叙事与神话
  • 批准号:
    AH/J006602/2
  • 财政年份:
    2012
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Creative Participation in Planning and Housing
创造性地参与规划和住房
  • 批准号:
    AH/J501553/1
  • 财政年份:
    2011
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant

相似海外基金

Populism’s Heartlands: Place, Identity, and Localism in Populist Politics
民粹主义的中心地带:民粹主义政治中的地位、身份和地方主义
  • 批准号:
    DP230100001
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Discovery Projects
Overlap between Exoticism and Localism: Toward the Construction of a Research Platoform for East Asian Modernism Studies
异国情调与本土主义的重叠:东亚现代主义研究平台的构建
  • 批准号:
    18K00509
  • 财政年份:
    2018
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Law, Localism & Governance
法律、地方主义
  • 批准号:
    ES/J004642/3
  • 财政年份:
    2014
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Fellowship
The Big Society, Localism & Housing Policy
大社会、地方主义
  • 批准号:
    ES/J021172/1
  • 财政年份:
    2012
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Localism and connected neighbourhood planning
地方主义和相连的邻里规划
  • 批准号:
    AH/J006580/1
  • 财政年份:
    2012
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Law, Localism & Governance
法律、地方主义
  • 批准号:
    ES/J004642/1
  • 财政年份:
    2012
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Fellowship
Localism, Narrative and Myth
地方主义、叙事与神话
  • 批准号:
    AH/J006602/1
  • 财政年份:
    2012
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Localism, Narrative and Myth
地方主义、叙事与神话
  • 批准号:
    AH/J006602/2
  • 财政年份:
    2012
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Community as micro sociality and the new localism agenda
作为微观社会的社区和新地方主义议程
  • 批准号:
    AH/J006890/1
  • 财政年份:
    2012
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
Aspects of localism of literary history and ethnography in Bohemia
波西米亚文学史和民族志的地方主义方面
  • 批准号:
    23520379
  • 财政年份:
    2011
  • 资助金额:
    $ 14.61万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了