A Dynamic Analysis of Poverty and Vulnerability in Wales: Moving Beyond the "Conventional" Approach

威尔士贫困和脆弱性的动态分析：超越“传统”方法

• 批准号: ES/M007235/1
• 负责人: Md Shafiul Azam
• 金额: $ 14.96万
• 依托单位: Aberystwyth University
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2014
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2014 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FM007235%2F1
• 关键词: Dynamic; Analysis; Poverty; Vulnerability; Wales

There is increasing recognition among academics and practitioners that poverty is multidimensional and context specific. It is the multiple aspects of poverty that together define the experience of the poor. Considering the various dimensions independently is insufficient but existing methods for computing Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) have several weaknesses that prevent meaningful poverty comparison over time, thereby limiting the ability to assess policy impact. Ravallion (2011, 12), for example, has criticised the MPI on the grounds of arbitrariness in selecting indicators and their weights. Another criticism of the MPI is that it measures poverty using a single year survey and therefore lacks dynamics (Addison et al. 2009). There is thus scope for serious empirical research to understand Multi-dimensional Poverty (MDP) as the outcome of dynamic processes in which a personal history, experience, livelihood strategy and associated risks drive some people to enter into a particular dimension of poverty (e.g. health) or make it difficult to help the poor in other dimensions (e.g. asset) escape from poverty.Evidence suggests that in-work poverty in Wales has been on the rise in the past decade (Gottfried and Lawton, 2010; JRF, 2013). Drawing upon the most recently available panel data on Wales and the wider UK (BHPS and Understanding Society) and combining them with qualitative information, we propose to go beyond the existing analysis of MDP by applying state-of-the-art econometric methods which allow us to understand MDP dynamics in Wales in general and in-work poverty in particular. More specifically, our models will help us understand mechanisms by which the duration of poverty in a particular dimension in the past potentially affects subsequent transitions of each component of poverty by modelling unobservable capabilities. The proposed research will establish the scale, importance and geography of in-work poverty in Wales. We will create maps of our MDP results for Wales.Furthermore, the results of the quantitative and spatial analyses will be validated through qualitative interaction on two levels: with departments of local government and voluntary sector organisations which work to tackle poverty at the level of individuals and households; and with individuals and households themselves which are experiencing multidimensional poverty. We will work through established networks of NGOs, such as the Homelessness Forum, and the Supporting People Forum, which unite the first category of participants in the qualitative phase of the inquiry. We will use an accessible briefing describing poverty determinants and proposed frameworks to tackle their effects as an introduction, a semi-structured interview with 15 purposively sampled participants. We will use the same local organisations to identify and interview the second category of participants, again with 15 purposively sampled interviews in situations which represent the key categories elicited from secondary data analysis. This will provide a clearer and more nuanced perspective on the mechanisms determining, and consequent problems arising, from in-work poverty and the families affected by it. Interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed in NVivo, using a phenomenological approach to obtain lived experience accounts from the perspective of practitioners and their clients.We will use mixed method procedures, giving equal precedence to the two major methodological perspectives, to provide new insights into efficient and effective approaches to tackling poverty in Wales. In a final stage these insights will be introduced, debated and consolidated into recommendations for policy development through three regional workshops with wider groups of stakeholders in North, Mid and South Wales, respectively. From this concluding round of discursive evaluations of our overall results, we will formulate our policy recommendations.

学术界和实践者日益认识到，贫穷是多方面的，具体情况也各不相同。贫困的多个方面共同决定了穷人的经历。单独考虑各个方面是不够的，但现有的计算多维贫困指数的方法有几个弱点，无法随着时间的推移进行有意义的贫困比较，从而限制了评估政策影响的能力。例如，Ravallion（2011年，第12页）批评MPI在选择指标及其权重方面的任意性。对多指标调查的另一个批评是，它使用一年的调查来衡量贫困，因此缺乏动态（Addison等人，2009年）。因此，有认真的实证研究的范围，了解多维贫困（MDP）作为动态过程的结果，其中个人的历史，经验，生计战略和相关风险使一些人陷入特定的贫困（如卫生）或使在其他方面帮助穷人变得困难有证据表明，过去十年来，威尔士的在职贫困一直在上升（Gottfried和Lawton，2010年; JRF，2013年）。利用威尔士和更广泛的英国（BHPS和理解社会）最近可用的面板数据，并将其与定性信息相结合，我们建议超越现有的分析MDP应用国家的最先进的计量经济学方法，使我们能够了解MDP动态在威尔士一般和特别是在工作贫困。更具体地说，我们的模型将帮助我们理解过去特定维度的贫困持续时间可能通过模拟不可观察的能力影响贫困每个组成部分随后的转变的机制。拟议的研究将确定威尔士在职贫穷的规模、重要性和地理分布。我们将为威尔士绘制MDP结果地图，此外，定量和空间分析的结果将通过两个层面的定性互动进行验证：与地方政府部门和志愿部门组织合作，在个人和家庭层面解决贫困问题;以及与经历多维贫困的个人和家庭本身。我们将通过已建立的非政府组织网络开展工作，如无家可归者论坛和支持人民论坛，这些论坛在调查的定性阶段将第一类参与者团结起来。我们将使用一个可访问的简报，描述贫困的决定因素和拟议的框架，以解决其影响作为介绍，半结构化的采访与15个有目的的抽样参与者。我们将使用相同的当地组织来识别和采访第二类参与者，再次与15个有目的的抽样采访的情况下，代表了从二手数据分析得出的关键类别。这将提供一个更清晰和更细致的视角来了解工作中贫困和受其影响的家庭的机制以及随之产生的问题。访谈将被录音，转录和在NVivo中分析，使用现象学方法从从业者和他们的客户的角度获得生活经验。我们将使用混合方法程序，对两个主要的方法论观点给予同等优先地位，为威尔士解决贫困问题的高效和有效方法提供新的见解。在最后阶段，将通过分别在北威尔士、中威尔士和南威尔士与更广泛的利益攸关方群体举行的三次区域讲习班，介绍、辩论这些见解，并将其纳入政策制定建议。根据对我们总体结果的最后一轮论述性评估，我们将制定我们的政策建议。