Entitlements, Disputes, and Provision for the Future: Making Wills and Negotiating Inheritance in South Africa's Middle Class
Entitlements, Disputes, and Provision for the Future: Making Wills and Negotiating Inheritance in South Africa's Middle Class
批准号:
ES/N003071/1
负责人:
Maxim Bolt
金额:
$18.18万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Research Grant
财政年份:
2016
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2016 至 --
中文摘要
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Since the end of apartheid, South Africa's black middle class has grown exponentially, as a new stratum of black citizens has moved into government and corporate employment. As more South Africans accumulate substantial property, its disbursement becomes a new terrain on which battles of kinship obligation are fought. This project approaches class reproduction through an ethnographic focus on wills and testaments: the processes through which they are made, and the disputes surrounding their execution. The result is an innovative lens that attends to the role of experts and bureaucrats in shaping the dynamics of class. It extends my interest in class reproduction, explored in my forthcoming book (CUP 2015) based on fieldwork in South Africa since 2006. In South Africa, as the post-apartheid black middle class ages and considers family futures, the project is especially timely.The project addresses key anthropological concerns. It combines political-economic (inequality) and cultural (lifestyle) perspectives on the middle class, and these with scholarship on state institutions. And it extends existing work on class and status reproduction by transcending generations. How do black middle-class South Africans pass on the property that shapes their kin's status and life chances? As will-making is promoted ever more widely, how do institutions that facilitate it inflect experiences of kinship and property before death forces the issue? How does this compare with the established white middle class?Within families, how are competing definitions of ownership, rights and entitlements judged? When expressions of future plans also become expressions of state regulation, how does this affect access to family property (e.g. township houses)? Who is included and excluded, in the bottleneck of bureaucracy and legal process?How and why are particular possessions valued? How are people's roles and entitlements constituted in the process?Amidst increasing inequality and precarity, how is will-making talked about? How have concerns about property and inheritance been reflected in the media?Given the South African black middle class's diverse history, how does will-making today compare with the past?Examining class reproduction over time means combining ethnographic and historical methods. For the former, I will begin with long-term observation in the Johannesburg High Court where disputes around wills are heard, and trace cases out from the formal probate process to fieldwork with individuals and families. Meanwhile, I will work with will consultants and lawyers, and interview judges, members of financial organisations, and the experts responsible for designing their online will templates. The former Dean of Law at Wits University (where I am a Research Associate) has expressed support, and is facilitating access to lawyers and judges. Taken together, the ethnographic research moves between institutional and personal processes, offering a bottom-up perspective that challenges easy meta-narratives.The historical research builds on ongoing collaborative work with my proposed mentor and colleagues at Wits University, on probate records as a source for South African black middle class history. This aims to capture all relevant records over a century of South African history. My proposed project explores qualitative case studies and aggregated quantitative data, offering a longer view on the accumulation and dispersal of property. Foregrounding the complex and unexpected roles of state officials and institutions raises questions for ethnographic fieldwork. For example, as executors, state officials diligently spent inheritances on behalf of deceased (e.g. minors' school fees). Meanwhile, ethnographic fieldwork on probate processes, and the intersection of personal and official, will generate questions for the archive. Outputs will illuminate will-making among today's middle class, but with the depth of historicisation.
期刊论文(7)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
登录
查看更多内容
Fluctuating formality: homeownership, inheritance, and the official economy in urban South Africa ?
波动的形式:南非城市的住房所有权、继承和官方经济?
DOI:
10.1111/1467-9655.13615
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
影响因子:
1.2
作者:
[Bolt M]
通讯作者:
Bolt M
'Creature of statute': Legal bureaucracy and the performance of professionalism in Johannesburg
“法规的创造”:约翰内斯堡的法律官僚机构和专业精神的表现
DOI:
10.1177/0308275x221139163
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
Critique of Anthropology
影响因子:
1.2
作者:
[Bolt M]
通讯作者:
Bolt M
Homeownership, Legal Administration, And The Uncertainties Of Inheritance In South Africa's Townships: Apartheid's Legal Shadows
南非乡镇的住房所有权、法律管理和继承的不确定性:种族隔离的法律阴影
DOI:
10.1093/afraf/adab001
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
African Affairs
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
[Bolt M]
通讯作者:
Bolt M
Engineering the middle classes: State institutions and the aspirations of citizenship
打造中产阶级:国家机构和公民的愿望
DOI:
10.1177/0308275x221139157
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
Critique of Anthropology
影响因子:
1.2
作者:
[Bolt M]
通讯作者:
Bolt M
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Bolt M]
通讯作者:
Bolt M
共 6 条
海外基金