Renewing Party Politics? Digital Innovations in Political Campaigning

更新政党政治?

基本信息

  • 批准号:
    ES/N01667X/1
  • 负责人:
  • 金额:
    $ 19.55万
  • 依托单位:
  • 依托单位国家:
    英国
  • 项目类别:
    Research Grant
  • 财政年份:
    2016
  • 资助国家:
    英国
  • 起止时间:
    2016 至 无数据
  • 项目状态:
    已结题

项目摘要

The link between citizens and the state is the crux of democratic politics, yet it is crumbling. Numerous studies have diagnosed a crisis in representative politics with decreased participation and growing levels of distrust bringing the legitimacy of democratic institutions into doubt. For many a solution has been offered by digital technology, leading parties to embrace new digital campaigning software. To explore the capacity of digital innovations to renew democracy this study argues that we need to understand the nature of the 'disconnect' between parties and the people. As such, this study departs from traditional analyses of 'digital democracy' by focusing on public attitudes. Adapting the methodological approach used by Allen and Birch (2015) the project will discern how the public and parties conceive democratic linkage in practice and as an ideal, highlighting contradictions and convergence to diagnose the problem. Correlating these insights to the functions of digital software and theories of democratic linkage (Dalton, Farrell and McAllister, 2011) the capacity of digital innovations to renew party politics is considered.To enable analysis 3 work packages (WP) are conducted.WP1: How do parties perceive democratic linkage, and how have parties used digital management systems since 2010?WP1 will first identify available forms of the type of digital innovation of interest to this project - namely 'digital management software' - and will categorise the functions they perform. Second, it will explore and develop theories of democratic linkage to provide a framework for subsequent analysis. Then, using interviews, internal party data and 3 case studies of constituency parties (1 from Labour, the Conservatives and Scottish National Party) the PI and RA will map perceptions of democratic linkage and usage of digital technology. This data will provide new insight on developments in party politics and will be used to produce case study accounts and articles that trace the form of change and consider the impact of digital technology on party organisation.WP2: How do citizens perceive democratic linkage, and how does parties' use of digital management systems affect public attitudes?Work package 2 explores the impact of new technology. Working with YouGov the PI will commission 2 surveys. The first will assess public attitudes towards parties', seeking to discern how the public want parties to engage and how they perceive this to work in practice. Data will be analysed to identify conceptions of democratic linkage (WP1) and then compared with party attitudes to identify synergies and incongruities in public and party conceptions. This analysis offers a diagnosis of the state of current linkage, and will identify areas of 'disconnect' to be further examined in WP3.This WP will also probe public attitudes towards parties' use of digital campaigning techniques. Utilising a split sample survey, designed in collaboration with Dr Chris Jones, the PI will assess whether practices such as social media data mining are compatible with public notions of democratic linkage. This will inform an article, infographics and practitioner briefing papers. WP3: Can digital campaigning methods resolve the disconnect between citizens and the state?In collaboration with the think tank Involve, the PI will use 3 deliberative events to explore parties' and citizens' attitudes towards democratic linkage and test the capacity of different forms of digital technology to reconcile these perceptions. Building on survey data these events will test attitudes; exploring whether sustained reflection affects how public and party desires are conceived (drawing on work by Stoker, Hay and Barr, forthcoming). Events will identify ideal forms of linkage - findings that will be used, returning to WP1, to consider the capacity of different forms of digital technology to promote linkage and hence renew party politics.
公民和国家之间的联系是民主政治的关键,但它正在瓦解。许多研究已经诊断出代议制政治中的危机,参与减少,不信任程度增加,使民主机构的合法性受到质疑。对于许多人来说,数字技术提供了一种解决方案,导致各政党接受新的数字竞选软件。为了探索数字创新更新民主的能力,这项研究认为,我们需要了解政党和人民之间“脱节”的本质。因此,这项研究不同于传统的“数字民主”分析,而是关注公众的态度。采用艾伦和伯奇(2015)使用的方法方法,该项目将辨别公众和政党如何在实践中构思民主联系,并将其视为理想,突出矛盾和趋同以诊断问题。将这些见解与数字软件的功能和民主联系的理论相关联(Dalton,Farrell和McAllister,2011)考虑了数字创新更新政党政治的能力。为了使分析成为可能,进行了3个工作包(WP)。WP1:政党如何看待民主联系,以及自2010年以来政党如何使用数字管理系统?WP1将首先确定与该项目相关的数字创新类型的可用形式--即“数字管理软件”--并将对它们所执行的功能进行分类。第二,探索和发展民主联动理论,为后续的分析提供一个框架。然后,使用采访、党内数据和3个选区政党的案例研究(1个来自工党、保守党和苏格兰民族党),PI和RA将绘制出对民主联系和数字技术使用的看法。这些数据将为政党政治的发展提供新的见解,并将被用来制作案例研究报告和文章,追踪变化的形式,并考虑数字技术对政党组织的影响。WP2:公民如何感知民主联系,以及政党使用数字管理系统如何影响公众态度?工作包2探索了新技术的影响。与YouGov合作,PI将委托进行2项调查。第一个将评估公众对政党的态度,试图弄清公众希望政党如何参与,以及他们如何看待这一点在实践中发挥作用。将对数据进行分析,以确定民主联系(WP1)的概念,然后与政党的态度进行比较,以确定公共和政党概念中的协同作用和不一致之处。这一分析提供了对当前联系状态的诊断,并将确定WP3中需要进一步检查的“脱节”领域。WP还将调查公众对政党使用数字竞选技术的态度。利用与克里斯·琼斯博士合作设计的分裂样本调查,PI将评估社交媒体数据挖掘等实践是否符合公众对民主联系的概念。这将为一篇文章、信息图和从业者简报提供信息。WP3:数字竞选方法能解决公民和国家之间的脱节吗?与智库Interest合作,PI将使用3个审议活动来探索政党和公民对民主联系的态度,并测试不同形式的数字技术调和这些看法的能力。在调查数据的基础上,这些活动将测试人们的态度;探索持续的反思是否会影响公众和政党的愿望是如何构思的(借鉴斯托克、海伊和巴尔的工作,即将出版)。活动将确定理想的联系形式--返回WP1时将使用这些调查结果来考虑不同形式的数字技术促进联系的能力,从而更新政党政治。

项目成果

期刊论文数量(10)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
Last Word Can Political Parties be Reformed?
最后一句话 政党可以改革吗?
  • DOI:
    10.1177/2041905818796579
  • 发表时间:
    2018
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Dommett K
  • 通讯作者:
    Dommett K
United Kingdom
英国
Digital Campaigning: The Rise of Facebook and Satellite Campaigns
数字营销活动:Facebook 和卫星营销活动的兴起
  • DOI:
    10.1093/pa/gsx056
  • 发表时间:
    2018
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    1.2
  • 作者:
    Dommett K
  • 通讯作者:
    Dommett K
Taking up the baton? New campaigning organisations and the enactment of representative functions
  • DOI:
    10.1177/0263395717725934
  • 发表时间:
    2018-11-01
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    1.8
  • 作者:
    Dommett, Katharine;Rye, Danny
  • 通讯作者:
    Rye, Danny
Roadblocks to interactive digital adoption? Elite perspectives of party practices in the United Kingdom
交互式数字化采用的障碍?
  • DOI:
    10.1177/1354068818761196
  • 发表时间:
    2018
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    2.7
  • 作者:
    Dommett K
  • 通讯作者:
    Dommett K
{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

Katharine Dommett其他文献

Quango reform: the next steps?
Quango 改革:下一步?
  • DOI:
    10.1080/09540962.2016.1162588
  • 发表时间:
    2016
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    2.5
  • 作者:
    Katharine Dommett;Muiris Maccarthaigh
  • 通讯作者:
    Muiris Maccarthaigh
How does rurality affect campaigning?
乡村性如何影响竞选活动?
  • DOI:
    10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102932
  • 发表时间:
    2025-06-01
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    2.300
  • 作者:
    Stephanie Luke;Charles Pattie;Luke Temple;Katharine Dommett
  • 通讯作者:
    Katharine Dommett
What makes online political ads unacceptable? Interrogating public attitudes to inform regulatory responses
是什么让在线政治广告不可接受?
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
    2023
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    Junyan Zhu;Katharine Dommett;Tom Stafford
  • 通讯作者:
    Tom Stafford

Katharine Dommett的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

相似海外基金

The Politics of Urban Industrialization: Integrating the Urban Industrial Nexus in Ethiopia's Disintegrating Party State
城市工业化的政治:整合埃塞俄比亚分崩离析的党国的城市工业联系
  • 批准号:
    ES/Y007522/1
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.55万
  • 项目类别:
    Fellowship
Nostalgia for a Pre-Socialist Past: The Communist Party and the Politics of History in Contemporary China
对前社会主义历史的怀旧:共产党与当代中国的历史政治
  • 批准号:
    ES/Y010280/1
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.55万
  • 项目类别:
    Fellowship
Polarization in Korea: A Crisis in Party Politics and Representative Democracy?
韩国的两极分化:政党政治和代议制民主的危机?
  • 批准号:
    23K11590
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.55万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Utopianism in the 2019 Labour Campaign and Manifesto: Investigating an Anomalous Moment in Contemporary British Party Politics
2019年工党运动和宣言中的乌托邦主义:调查当代英国政党政治的异常时刻
  • 批准号:
    2716862
  • 财政年份:
    2022
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.55万
  • 项目类别:
    Studentship
Violence and Party Politics in Mexico
墨西哥的暴力和政党政治
  • 批准号:
    20K01467
  • 财政年份:
    2020
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.55万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Local Elections and Party Politics: The Analysis of the Impact of Local-Level Electoral Systems on Party Policy Formation
地方选举与政党政治:地方选举制度对政党政策形成的影响分析
  • 批准号:
    20K13420
  • 财政年份:
    2020
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.55万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
Parliamentary Politics and the House of Peers after the Collapse of the Party Cabinets 1932-1947
1932-1947 年党内阁垮台后的议会政治和贵族院
  • 批准号:
    20K13180
  • 财政年份:
    2020
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.55万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
Two-Party Politics in the British Urban Communities, c. 1815-1832
英国城市社区的两党政治,c。
  • 批准号:
    20K13218
  • 财政年份:
    2020
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.55万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
comparing intra-party politics and ideological polarization
比较党内政治和意识形态极化
  • 批准号:
    20K13408
  • 财政年份:
    2020
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.55万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
Universalism of the Nordic Welfare System: Focusing on the Relations between Party Politics and Social Policy in Finland
北欧福利制度的普世主义:聚焦芬兰政党政治与社会政策的关系
  • 批准号:
    19K20532
  • 财政年份:
    2019
  • 资助金额:
    $ 19.55万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了