Improving the uptake and SusTainability of Effective interventions to promote Prudent antibiotic Use in Primary care (STEP-UP)
Improving the uptake and SusTainability of Effective interventions to promote Prudent antibiotic Use in Primary care (STEP-UP)
批准号:
ES/P008232/1
负责人:
Ann Walker
金额:
$223.14万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Research Grant
财政年份:
2017
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2017 至 --
中文摘要
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Bacteria are increasingly resistant to the antibiotics we use to kill them. This is a major problem for us all. The more we use antibiotics, the more resistant the bacteria become. In England, GPs prescribe about 3/4 of antibiotics used. Most of these prescriptions (about 80%) will not actually benefit the patient but all will help to increase antibiotic resistance.Many ways to help GPs prescribe fewer antibiotics to patients who are unlikely to benefit have been tested. These have included training and strategies like 'back-up' prescriptions for patients to use if symptoms get worse. Many have worked well and GPs using them have prescribed fewer antibiotics. The problem is that GPs not taking part in the research have not started using them, so very little has changed overall.Government policies have also been introduced to give general practices more money if doctors prescribe fewer antibiotics to patients who are unlikely to benefit. This cost millions of pounds, and reduced antibiotic use, but it is not clear how promising extra money actually makes changes happen.When researchers test a new diagnostic tool or training package, they don't just ask whether it works, but how much it would cost the NHS to use widely. Working out 'value for money' balances costs now against benefits and risks in the future. Antibiotics are so cheap (usually under £1 for a course) that most analyses suggest everyone should always get antibiotics. The problem is that we don't have good ways to include the threat that resistance poses in the future in these cost-benefit calculations.This means that we spend time and money looking for new 'magic bullets' to reduce antibiotic prescribing, without getting the most from what we already know can work, but is not used. We need to know why effective strategies aren't used and improve them so they are used regularly in every-day care.This project aims first to understand in more detail how the strategies that previous studies have shown reduce antibiotic prescribing worked. We need to do this because 'common sense' ideas are often wrong: different people react in different ways to the same situation and what researchers think is going on is often not the case. This will help us come up with ways to make existing strategies more attractive and easier to use every day. These will increase their uptake across England, meaning we can continue to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use and the threat of antibiotic resistance.We will investigate 4 different, carefully chosen, areas.- Incentivising general practices: evaluating an England-wide policy to pay general practices to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use- Changes to the system: exploring 'delayed prescribing' where GPs give a prescription that patients can 'cash-in' if their symptoms get worse- Improving GPs communication skills: investigating ways to help GPs explain to patients when antibiotics are not needed- Better-informing decision-makers: assessing how we balance the health and cost impact of antibiotic use now vs resistance in the future, and how we determine cost-effectiveness of changes in antibiotic useIn each area, we will run detailed studies to find out what the barriers are to using effective strategies, and work out ways to overcome them. These will include studies with clinical commissioning groups, with GPs, nurse prescribers, practice managers and patients. We will then develop ways to improve strategies, in partnership with different types of healthcare professionals and patients. We will test these enhancements in an implementation study. We will also develop and apply new economic evaluation research methods to assess value for money.Our team covers expertise in health psychology, health economics, biostatistics, primary care, pharmacy and clinical epidemiology. It also provides the opportunity for younger researchers to take leadership roles whilst being supported by more experienced colleagues.
期刊论文(10)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
登录
查看更多内容
Additional file 4 of Implementing interventions to reduce antibiotic use: a qualitative study in high-prescribing practices
实施干预措施以减少抗生素使用的附加文件 4:高处方实践的定性研究
DOI:
10.6084/m9.figshare.13634286
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Borek A]
通讯作者:
Borek A
Patient Portal Functionalities and Patient Outcomes Among Patients With Diabetes: Systematic Review (Preprint)
糖尿病患者的患者门户功能和患者结果:系统评价(预印本)
DOI:
10.2196/preprints.18976
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Alturkistani A]
通讯作者:
Alturkistani A
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on community antibiotic prescribing and stewardship: a qualitative interview study with general practitioners in England
COVID-19 大流行对社区抗生素处方和管理的影响:对英格兰全科医生的定性访谈研究
DOI:
10.1101/2021.11.19.21266529
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Borek A]
通讯作者:
Borek A
DOI:
10.3399/bjgpopen20x101052
发表时间:
2020-08-01
期刊:
BJGP open
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Anyanwu, Philip Emeka, Pouwels, Koen, Costelloe, Ceire]
通讯作者:
Costelloe, Ceire
Investigating the mechanism of impact of the Quality Premium initiative on antibiotic prescribing in primary care practices in England: a study protocol.
调查质量溢价计划对英格兰初级保健实践中抗生素处方的影响机制:一项研究方案。
DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030093
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
BMJ open
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
[Anyanwu PE]
通讯作者:
Anyanwu PE
共 8 条
Syndromic infections
-
批准号:MC_UU_00004/05
-
项目类别:Intramural
-
资助金额:$395.89万
-
财政年份:2021
-
负责人:Ann Walker
-
依托单位:
Other infectious diseases of global public health significance
-
批准号:MC_UU_12023/22
-
项目类别:Intramural
-
资助金额:$439.47万
-
财政年份:2015
-
负责人:Ann Walker
-
依托单位:
国内基金
海外基金
α-突触核蛋白调控uptake 2转运体: 多巴胺受体激动剂抗帕金森降效机制研究
-
批准号:81773811
-
项目类别:面上项目
-
资助金额:61.5万元
-
批准年份:2017
-
负责人:黄建耿
-
依托单位:
基于Uptake 2转运体抑制的元胡抗抑郁活性成分及机制研究
-
批准号:81673504
-
项目类别:面上项目
-
资助金额:54.0万元
-
批准年份:2016
-
负责人:周慧
-
依托单位: