Parties, Parliament and the Brexit Process
Parties, Parliament and the Brexit Process
批准号:
ES/R000646/1
负责人:
Adam Cygan
金额:
$30.71万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Research Grant
财政年份:
2017
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2017 至 --
中文摘要
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
The 2016 referendum vote for Brexit is already having a significant effect on British political parties and the UK Parliament. It is reshaping the divisions within and between political parties, impacting upon the strategies adopted by parties and individual MPs, and requiring Parliament to adapt its structures and procedures as the Brexit process becomes a critical area of its activity. The proposed project brings together experts drawn from the fields of law and political science, who will work with the Industry and Parliament Trust to inform their research and ensure dialogue with policymakers and the business community.The project combines analysis of the importance of institutions (e.g. parliamentary procedures and structures), and legislative and regulatory norms with an examination of the motivations and behaviour of political parties, individual MPs and the government. These are linked because internal party divisions, cross-party alliances and the differing preferences of MPs on Brexit will affect how - and how well - Parliament scrutinises the process of leaving the EU. The purpose of this project is:(1) To enhance understanding of how the Brexit vote has affected UK party politics, including divisions within and between parties, the positions and preferences of MPs, party positions in Parliament and party competition on EU issues. We will collect and analyse data on the positions on the EU issue adopted by parties and MPs since 2010, assessing how divisions within parties are changing and whether new patterns of cross-party cooperation are emerging. (2) To develop knowledge of how Parliament has responded to Brexit in terms of its structures and procedures, and how effective this response has been. We will examine the work of the new Exiting the EU select committee, the European Scrutiny Committee and other departmental select committees, collecting data on and assessing divisions and cooperation within and across these bodies. (3) To identify those areas of policy that have been most subject to conflict between and within parties and are most likely to change once the UK has left the EU. After Brexit, the UK Parliament will exercise regulatory control over a range of policy areas (e.g. environmental protection, farming, employment rights) which have hitherto been legislated for at the EU level. Parliament will make choices about how, and under what principles it wishes to legislate. We assess the extent to which MPs seek to formulate UK versions of existing EU legislation or continue to broadly adopt EU norms and standards. Our research on whether MPs behave according to traditional party affiliations, or new cross-party alliances and intra-party disputes emerge will also help to explain what factors shape the post-Brexit legislative agenda. (4) To address the needs of key stakeholders by working with our impact partner the Industry and Parliament Trust (IPT) to: (a) better understand the interests and concerns of business and industry stakeholders regarding the Brexit process and the changes that Brexit is likely to bring to their activities; (b) foster effective dialogue between business and industry stakeholders and MPs, notably through a series of seminars and workshops; and (c) provide business and industry stakeholders with clear guidance and analysis of the role and activity of Parliament and MPs in the Brexit process.(5) To maximise user engagement and public understanding by working with the Director of the ERSC UK in a Changing Europe Programme and other projects within it to: (a) synthesise and develop research on parties, Parliament and the transfer of competences; (b) disseminate our research findings to a range of stakeholders and the general public in an easily-accessible form through a variety of forums; and (c) lay the foundations for future research on the impact of Brexit.
期刊论文(10)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
登录
查看更多内容
A no deal Brexit is simple in principle, but fiendishly tricky to manage smoothly
无协议脱欧原则上很简单,但要顺利管理却极其棘手
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Adam Cygan]
通讯作者:
Adam Cygan
Research Handbook on Legal Aspects of Brexit
英国脱欧法律问题研究手册
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Adam Cygan]
通讯作者:
Adam Cygan
What would a good Brexit look like for Leicester and Leicestershire?
对于莱斯特和莱斯特郡来说,良好的脱欧会是什么样子?
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Adam Cygan]
通讯作者:
Adam Cygan
Achieving EU Data Protection Equivalence: Protecting Cross-Border Trade
实现欧盟数据保护同等性:保护跨境贸易
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Adam Cygan]
通讯作者:
Adam Cygan
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Adam Cygan]
通讯作者:
Adam Cygan
共 10 条
Parties Parliament and the Brexit Process - General Election 2019
-
批准号:ES/T015241/1
-
项目类别:Research Grant
-
资助金额:$5.18万
-
财政年份:2019
-
负责人:Adam Cygan
-
依托单位:
海外基金