Where does work belong anymore? The impact of the COVID19 pandemic on working in the UK
工作又属于哪里?
基本信息
- 批准号:ES/V003976/2
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 16.67万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:英国
- 项目类别:Research Grant
- 财政年份:2020
- 资助国家:英国
- 起止时间:2020 至 无数据
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:
项目摘要
The COVID-19 outbreak has forced companies to embrace home-based working (HBW) at such speed that they have had little opportunity to consider the impact on their workers. It can be argued that the crisis has led to the most significant, intensive social experiment of digital, HBW that has ever occurred. The current situation, which involves the whole household being based at home, is an unprecedented challenge which may be at least an intermittent fixture, for the next eighteen months (BBC Futures, 25/03/20). The press have suggested that this revolution "might also offer an opportunity for many companies to finally build a culture that allows long-overdue work flexibility ...many employees for companies who have sent all staff home are already starting to question why they had to go into the office in the first place" (The Guardian, 13/02/20). These optimistic takes on the current patterns of work focus on HBW's emancipatory potential, offering flexibility, the lubrication of work and family responsibilities and the promise of increased productivity. Yet, this new world order, where the home becomes a multi-occupational, multi-person workplace and school, not only challenges boundaries but also conceptions of the domestic space. The impact of homeworking is likely to present significant variation depending on organisational support, the worker's role, socio-economic status, employment status, as well as household composition and size of living space. There are significant concerns regarding intensified HBW, including poor work-life balance, enhanced domestic tensions and disproportionately negative impacts on those in lower socio-economic groupings. Moreover, HBW increases the proportion of time women (most often) spend on housework and childcare, reproducing and reinforcing gender roles within the new 'work-space'We will examine in-depth this radical shift in working arrangements and how it impacts on the wellbeing and productivity of workers and their households. Using a combination of in-depth interviews with sixty participants, representing the spectrum of this novel group of homeworkers, as well as a large-scale survey, this project (Working@Home) will provide unrivalled insights into the experience of home-working for the UK population and will serve as a permanent record of the lives of citizens in this unprecedented time. The research will be key in understanding the expectations that organisations have placed on workers, as well as the robustness of support systems that have been put in place, taking into account the rapid advancement of home working systems with almost no preparation and only limited existing support structures or expertise. The findings will provide a benchmark for the resilience of both individuals and businesses and demonstrate the potential for the robustness of the infrastructure in the return to a 'new normal' after the crisis. In order to ensure that the findings from the project are accessible to all, we are developing a website (workingathome.org.uk) that will host up to date information on the progress of the project, details of the project team, guidance for participants as well as information regarding our webinar series. The project aims to produce guidance to individuals, organisations and policy makers on how to best manage the ongoing medical emergency from a home-working perspective as well as providing guidance for any future pandemic scenario.
COVID-19爆发迫使公司以如此快的速度接受在家工作(HBW),以至于他们几乎没有机会考虑对员工的影响。可以说,这场危机导致了有史以来最重要、最密集的数字社会实验--HBW。目前的情况是,整个家庭都呆在家里,这是一个前所未有的挑战,在未来的18个月里,这可能至少是一个间歇性的固定装置(BBC期货,25/03/20)。新闻界认为,这场革命“也可能为许多公司提供一个机会,最终建立一种文化,允许长期拖延的工作灵活性。许多公司的员工已经开始质疑为什么他们必须首先进入办公室”(卫报,13/02/20)。这些乐观的看法对目前的工作模式的重点是HBW的解放潜力,提供灵活性,润滑的工作和家庭责任和提高生产力的承诺。然而,这种新的世界秩序,家庭成为一个多职业,多人的工作场所和学校,不仅挑战了界限,也挑战了家庭空间的概念。在家工作的影响可能会因组织支持、工人的角色、社会经济地位、就业状况以及家庭组成和生活空间的大小而存在重大差异。人们对HBW加剧表示严重关切,包括工作与生活平衡不良,国内紧张局势加剧以及对社会经济地位较低群体的负面影响不成比例。此外,HBW增加了女性(最经常)花在家务和育儿上的时间比例,在新的“工作空间”中再现和加强了性别角色。通过对60名参与者的深入访谈,代表了这一新颖的家庭工作者群体的光谱,以及大规模的调查,该项目(Working@Home)将为英国人口的家庭工作体验提供无与伦比的见解,并将成为这个前所未有的时代公民生活的永久记录。这项研究将是了解组织对工人的期望以及已经到位的支持系统的稳健性的关键,考虑到家庭工作系统的快速发展,几乎没有准备,只有有限的现有支持结构或专业知识。调查结果将为个人和企业的复原力提供基准,并展示危机后基础设施恢复“新常态”的潜力。为了确保所有人都能获得该项目的结果,我们正在开发一个网站(workingathome.org.uk),其中将提供有关该项目进展情况的最新信息、项目团队的详细信息、对参与者的指导以及有关我们网络研讨会系列的信息。该项目旨在为个人、组织和政策制定者提供指导,指导他们如何从家庭工作的角度最好地管理正在进行的医疗紧急情况,并为任何未来的大流行情况提供指导。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(2)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
Where does work belong anymore? The implications of intensive homebased working
工作又属于哪里?
- DOI:10.1108/gm-06-2020-0173
- 发表时间:2020
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:Mallett O
- 通讯作者:Mallett O
The Great Resignation in the UK - reality, fake news or something in between?
英国的“大辞职”——现实、假新闻还是介于两者之间?
- DOI:10.1108/pr-09-2022-0608
- 发表时间:2023
- 期刊:
- 影响因子:3.9
- 作者:Marks A
- 通讯作者:Marks A
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
Abigail Marks其他文献
Older Workers and Occupational Identity in the Telecommunications Industry: Navigating Employment Transitions through the Life Course
电信行业的老年工人和职业认同:在生命历程中引导就业转型
- DOI:
10.1177/0950017018760212 - 发表时间:
2019 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
Robert MacKenzie;Abigail Marks - 通讯作者:
Abigail Marks
Choreographing a System: Skill and Employability in Software Work
编排系统:软件工作中的技能和就业能力
- DOI:
10.1177/0143831x07085141 - 发表时间:
2008 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:1.5
- 作者:
Abigail Marks;D. Scholarios - 通讯作者:
D. Scholarios
Virtual Temptations: Reorganising Work under Conditions of Digitisation, Virtualisation and Informatisation
虚拟诱惑:数字化、虚拟化、信息化条件下的工作重组
- DOI:
10.1057/978-1-137-61014-0_4 - 发表时间:
2017 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
Kendra Briken;Shiona Chillas;Martin Krzywdzinski;Abigail Marks;Mascha Will - 通讯作者:
Mascha Will
The New Digital Workplace
新的数字化工作场所
- DOI:
10.1057/978-1-137-61014-0 - 发表时间:
2017 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
Kendra Briken;Shiona Chillas;Martin Krzywdzinski;Abigail Marks - 通讯作者:
Abigail Marks
Emotional Labour and the Autonomy of Dependent Self-Employed Workers: The Limitations of Digital Managerial Control in the Home Credit Sector
情感劳动和依赖个体经营者的自主性:家庭信贷行业数字化管理控制的局限性
- DOI:
- 发表时间:
2021 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
Esme Terry;Abigail Marks;Arek Dakessian;D. Christopoulos - 通讯作者:
D. Christopoulos
Abigail Marks的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
{{ truncateString('Abigail Marks', 18)}}的其他基金
Where does work belong anymore? The impact of the COVID19 pandemic on working in the UK
工作又属于哪里?
- 批准号:
ES/V003976/1 - 财政年份:2020
- 资助金额:
$ 16.67万 - 项目类别:
Research Grant
相似国自然基金
衍射光学三维信息加密与隐藏的研究
- 批准号:60907004
- 批准年份:2009
- 资助金额:22.0 万元
- 项目类别:青年科学基金项目
相似海外基金
Meiosis in Plasmodium: How does it work?
疟原虫减数分裂:它是如何运作的?
- 批准号:
BB/X014681/1 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 16.67万 - 项目类别:
Research Grant
Meiosis in Plasmodium: How does it work?
疟原虫减数分裂:它是如何运作的?
- 批准号:
BB/X014452/1 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 16.67万 - 项目类别:
Research Grant
Does treating low density malaria infections reduce malaria transmission?
治疗低密度疟疾感染是否可以减少疟疾传播?
- 批准号:
10574796 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 16.67万 - 项目类别:
How does neuronal contact mediate astrocyte transcriptional maturation?
神经元接触如何介导星形胶质细胞转录成熟?
- 批准号:
10748163 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 16.67万 - 项目类别:
Communication quality during family meetings in the intensive care unit: how does quality impact health outcomes?
重症监护病房家庭会议期间的沟通质量:质量如何影响健康结果?
- 批准号:
10718011 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 16.67万 - 项目类别:
Memory Care in Assisted Living: Does it Improve Quality Outcomes?
辅助生活中的记忆护理:它能提高质量结果吗?
- 批准号:
10807400 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 16.67万 - 项目类别:
Does a ketogenic diet impair metabolic health?
生酮饮食会损害代谢健康吗?
- 批准号:
10751471 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 16.67万 - 项目类别:
Does microbiome composition moderate GI and CNS function in a VPA-induced mouse model of autism?
在 VPA 诱导的自闭症小鼠模型中,微生物组组成是否会调节胃肠道和中枢神经系统功能?
- 批准号:
10753699 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 16.67万 - 项目类别:
Experiences of Rural Sexual and Gender Minority Couples: Does Alcohol Use Explain the Link Between Minority Stress and Intimate Partner Discord and Violence
农村性和性别少数群体夫妇的经历:饮酒能否解释少数群体压力与亲密伴侣不和谐和暴力之间的联系
- 批准号:
10566746 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 16.67万 - 项目类别:
Why does oral fluency predict silent reading comprehension? Neurocognitive markers of implicit meter as a potential mediator
为什么口语流利程度可以预测默读理解能力?
- 批准号:
10515099 - 财政年份:2022
- 资助金额:
$ 16.67万 - 项目类别:














{{item.name}}会员




