Planning for transitions? Exploring the interface between planning, politics and grassroots sustainability transitions
Planning for transitions? Exploring the interface between planning, politics and grassroots sustainability transitions
批准号:
ES/V011421/1
负责人:
Amy Burnett
金额:
$13.66万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Fellowship
财政年份:
2020
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2020 至 --
中文摘要
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
The UK government declared a climate emergency in May 2019. As of February 2020, 269 out of 408 (65%) District, County, Unitary and Metropolitan Councils declared a Climate Emergency, as well as eight Combined Authorities/City Regions (Climate Emergency, 2020). In June 2019, national government set a target of net-zero emissions by 2050, compared to the previous one of at least an 80% reduction by that date. The planning process has a significant role to play in promoting a sustainable approach to land management in built and natural environments (Williams, 2013, Carroli, 2018; Smedby and Quitzau, 2016). For instance, should the Environment Bill and Agriculture Bills receive Royal Assent, planning could help deliver 'public good' benefits (where environmental enhancements are rewarded by government policy, such as improved soil and water quality) or net-biodiversity gain (leaving the environment and habitats in a better condition than before development). These moves are heralded as a step-change (HMG, 2020) and could well support a move towards, or transition to, more 'sustainable' development patterns; however, these are relatively new concepts that planning authorities will need to adapt to. My PhD research on Frome, a market town in Somerset, South West England has important lessons for local democracy and environmental action. Frome town council is, since 2011, controlled by a group of local people under the guise of the 'Independents for Frome (IfF)' group. IfF is a non-party-political organisation and, by bypassing party-politics, has achieved many positive initiatives by breaking the mould of adversarial, divisive forms of party-politics; including reconstructing the administration of the town council towards non-partisan Ways of Working. Many initiatives under IfF, such as seeking to bestow 'nature rights' on the local River Frome, are what some scholars and activists term the 'Commons' - the community-management of resources with societal and environmental benefits. Frome's experiences and reasons for success can provide insights in how to capture and reorientate local institutions towards environmental benefits and social wellbeing. Frome's story also reveals the politics and the tensions of 'independent' actors challenging established institutions, particularly when using rights that promised to deliver power to ordinary people under the government's Localism policy agenda. For instance, my PhD found that Neighbourhood Planning strongly filtered the amount of power available at the lowest tiers of government due to the way the Planning system operates, whilst entrenching some local power networks. This Fellowship would work with and bring together identified stakeholders within community development, politics and planning through two workshops to broaden discussions on the role of planning for transitions. The first workshop, hosted at DRIFT (a widely respected consortium of cutting-edge academics and a key node in European transition networks) would explore and broaden the more theoretical lines of my PhD to probe the dynamics of sustainability in transitions (see Case for Support, PhD Summary). Tying in European developments to environmental governance to those in England would refine the papers I plan to write during the Fellowship, allowing a critical account of the politics of planning for transitions at different scales. The second workshop on the English context would deepen our understanding of how the mechanisms of planning are affected by the politics of local governance. Engaging different actors to share insights, frustrations and opportunities across 'scales' and 'sectors' could help to overcome institutional silos and encourage collaborative approaches to cultivate and capture sustainability transitions. Working with think tanks and policy actors would 'level up' these discussions towards concrete actions, supporting a framework for lesson learning and policy transfer.
期刊论文(4)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
登录
查看更多内容
Securing a regenerative and just planning system
确保再生且公正的规划系统
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
Town and Country Planning
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Burnett, B]
通讯作者:
Burnett, B
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Burnett, A]
通讯作者:
Burnett, A
Can Sustainability Knowledge-Action Platforms Advance Multi-level Sustainability Transitions?
可持续发展知识行动平台能否推动多层次的可持续发展转型?
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Burnett, A]
通讯作者:
Burnett, A
The Politics of Transition: Innovative Place-Making and Alternative Development Models Under English Localism
转型政治:英国本土主义下的创新场所营造和替代发展模式
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2024
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Burnett Amy]
通讯作者:
Burnett Amy
海外基金