Efflux of methane (CH4) to the atmosphere from northern peatlands via ebullition: the role of plants and peat structure.

甲烷 (CH4) 通过沸腾从北部泥炭地流出到大气中：植物和泥炭结构的作用。

• 批准号: NE/F003390/2
• 负责人: Andrew James Baird
• 金额: $ 14.07万
• 依托单位: University of Leeds
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2009
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2009 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=NE%2FF003390%2F2
• 关键词: Efflux; methane; CH4; atmosphere; northern

Large areas of the northern hemisphere's land mass are covered with peat soils. Peats form in waterlogged conditions. When peatland plants die and start to decay they form peat. Over many thousands of years, peat deposits have built up and may exceed 5-10 m in thickness. It is commonly thought that the decay of plant material cannot take place in waterlogged conditions. However, decay does occur below the water table and produces a gas called methane. Methane is an important greenhouse gas - that is, it contributes to the greenhouse effect - and northern peatlands are one of the largest global sources of this gas. Scientists are interested in predicting how much methane enters the atmosphere so that they are better able to predict climate change. As part of this effort, they have written computer models that simulate the production of methane in peat soils and the escape of this gas to the atmosphere. In the computer models it is assumed that methane can escape from peats to the atmosphere in three main ways: (i) by slow diffusion through the spaces between peat fibres, (ii) by diffusion and sometimes mass flow through vascular wetland plants like sedges, and (iii) as bubbles rising through the peat, a process called ebullition. A problem with applying these computer models is that we have very little understanding of how much methane escapes via bubbles and the factors involved in bubble loss, so it has not been possible to simulate accurately the process of ebullition. Some recent studies have shown that ebullition may be much more important than previously thought. Indeed, some researchers have suggested (i) that ebullition can account for more loss of methane to the atmosphere than the other two pathways combined (diffusion and plant-mediated transport) and (ii) that previous measurements of methane losses from northern peatlands are gross underestimates. However, that ebullition is the dominant pathway for transport of methane to the atmosphere in peatlands currently has the status of hypothesis and more work is urgently needed on characterising bubble build up and losses in northern peatlands. The purpose of our study is to gain a better understanding of both processes in one important class of peatland / bogs. We will take samples of peat (including the growing surface of the bog) back to the laboratory and keep them in state-of-the-art environmental cabinets where the light, temperature and humidity can be set to realistic values. We aim to answer three key research questions: 1. In bogs, how do the magnitude of the methane efflux and the relative importance of the mechanisms of that efflux (i.e. diffusion, plant-mediated, and ebullition) vary according to peat type? 2. How is bubble buildup and release affected by peat structure? 3. How does the presence of vascular plants, especially common types of sedge, affect bubble build up and loss from bog peats? Having the peat in the laboratory makes it possible to take sophisticated measurements of gas bubble dynamics that are not possible in the field. We will measure how gas bubbles accumulate in the peat during the onset of spring/summer conditions (when most methane is produced) and also how they are released from the peat. New technologies involving measuring the electrical properties of the peat will allow us to map where most bubbles form and how the volume of bubble accumulations changes in response to more methane being produced and the loss of bubbles to the surface of the peat. After the experiments, we will analyse the structure of the peat using an x-ray scanner. Using the x-rays we will be able to reconstruct the 'skeleton' of the peat and will be able to identify the plant remains that make up the peat, like stems of Sphagnum mosses and roots of sedges. With our knowledge of bubble build up in our samples, we will be able to identify which structures within the peat are most effective at trapping bubbles.

北方的大部分陆地都覆盖着泥炭土。泥炭是在浸水的条件下形成的。当泥炭地的植物死亡并开始腐烂时，它们就形成了泥炭。经过数千年的积累，泥炭沉积物的厚度可能超过5-10米。人们普遍认为，植物材料的腐烂不会发生在浸水的条件下。然而，衰变确实发生在地下水位以下，并产生一种称为甲烷的气体。甲烷是一种重要的温室气体--也就是说，它促成了温室效应--而北方泥炭地是全球最大的这种气体来源之一。科学家们对预测有多少甲烷进入大气层感兴趣，以便他们能够更好地预测气候变化。作为这项工作的一部分，他们编写了计算机模型，模拟泥炭土壤中甲烷的产生以及这种气体逃逸到大气中的过程。在计算机模型中，假设甲烷可以通过三种主要方式从泥炭中逃逸到大气中：（i）通过泥炭纤维之间的空间缓慢扩散，（ii）通过扩散，有时通过芦苇等维管湿地植物的质量流，以及（iii）作为气泡通过泥炭上升，这一过程称为沸腾。应用这些计算机模型的一个问题是，我们对有多少甲烷通过气泡逸出以及气泡损失所涉及的因素知之甚少，因此不可能准确地模拟沸腾过程。最近的一些研究表明，沸腾可能比以前认为的要重要得多。事实上，一些研究人员认为：（i）沸腾可以解释更多的甲烷损失到大气中，而不是其他两种途径（扩散和植物介导的运输）的总和;（ii）以前对北方泥炭地甲烷损失的测量严重低估。然而，沸腾是泥炭地甲烷向大气传输的主要途径，目前仍处于假设状态，迫切需要更多的工作来表征北方泥炭地的气泡积聚和损失。我们研究的目的是为了更好地了解这两个过程中的一个重要类泥炭地/沼泽。我们将泥炭样本（包括沼泽的生长表面）带回实验室，并将其保存在最先进的环境柜中，在那里可以将光线，温度和湿度设置为现实值。我们的目标是回答三个关键的研究问题：1。在沼泽中，甲烷排放的大小和排放机制（即扩散、植物介导和沸腾）的相对重要性如何根据泥炭类型而变化？2.泥炭结构如何影响气泡的形成和释放？3.维管植物的存在，特别是常见的莎草，如何影响泡的建立和沼泽泥炭的损失？在实验室中有泥炭可以对气泡动力学进行复杂的测量，这在野外是不可能的。我们将测量气泡如何在春季/夏季条件（当大多数甲烷产生时）开始时在泥炭中积累，以及它们如何从泥炭中释放。涉及测量泥炭电特性的新技术将使我们能够绘制大多数气泡形成的位置以及气泡积累的体积如何响应更多甲烷的产生和气泡在泥炭表面的损失而变化。实验结束后，我们将使用X射线扫描仪分析泥炭的结构。利用X射线，我们将能够重建泥炭的“骨架”，并能够识别构成泥炭的植物遗骸，如泥炭藓的茎和莎草的根。根据我们对样品中气泡形成的了解，我们将能够确定泥炭中哪些结构最能有效地捕获气泡。