PHONOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN WORD RECOGNITION

一系列的10个实验，建议进行期间， 培训期间。 这些实验是基于最近的一种现象 被候选人发现。 这种现象涉及到“反馈 “不一致”的词，如SWEET和TREAT，它们共享它们的 音系体，但不同的正字法机构。 的 候选人和她的博士生导师已经表明，反馈 不一致的单词更难识别（在词汇判断任务中） 而不是反馈一致的词。 这种现象与 候选者称为传统的“前馈一致性 效果，”其中正字法体可以发音的单词 不止一种方式（例如，PINT和MINT）更难识别， 其正字法体只能以一种方式发音的单词（例如， 地球仪和PROBE）。最近发现的反馈现象 影响视觉单词识别的不一致性是一个引人注目的 语音学在阅读中的作用。此外，委员会认为， 识别这些反馈不一致的词有助于澄清经常 其他音位效应的微弱发现报告中 文学（也许是由于未能控制这些 在以前的实验中的项目类型）。

A series of ten experiments is proposed to be conducted during the training period. These experiments are based on a phenomenon recently discovered by the candidate. The phenomenon involves "feedback inconsistent" words, such as SWEET and TREAT, which share their phonological bodies but differ in their orthographic bodies. The candidate and her doctoral advisor have shown that feedback inconsistent words are harder to recognize (in a lexical decision task) than are feedback consistent words. This phenomenon parallels what the candidate refers to as the traditional "feedforward consistency effect," in which words whose orthographic bodies can be pronounced more than one way (e.g., PINT and MINT) are harder to recognize than words whose orthographic bodies can only be pronounced one way (e.g., GLOBE and PROBE). The recently discovered phenomenon of feedback inconsistency affecting visual word recognition is a striking demonstration of the role of phonology in reading. Moreover, identifying these feedback inconsistent words helps clarify the often tenuous finding of other phonological effects reported in the literature (perhaps attributable to a failure to control for these types of items in previous experiments).