To accelerate the economic and social impact of NERC science within human health and wellbeing, by improving and targeting knowledge exchange.
通过改善和有针对性的知识交流,加速 NERC 科学对人类健康和福祉的经济和社会影响。
基本信息
- 批准号:NE/L002922/1
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 12.61万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:英国
- 项目类别:Fellowship
- 财政年份:2013
- 资助国家:英国
- 起止时间:2013 至 无数据
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:
项目摘要
What is the main aim? It is to bring businesses, scientists and health professionals together to share their knowledge, and to form a new project partnership. That project will simultaneously provide new insights in the value and management of nature, and improve people's health. This is done in the context of the broader objective of increasing the social and economic impact of natural science research.What research?Some relevant topics include: ecology; the ways in which evolution and co-evolution occur; the function of microbes in the soil; the ways in which animals behave; and the ways in which nature provides 'services' like flood defence, pest control and carbon storage.If it's about environmental research, then why focus on health? Health is central to our happiness and to our economy. 10% of UK GDP is spent on health and social care; the sheer scale of this means that there are business opportunities for those who can find ways to reduce overall costs. Saying that we know nature can improve health is not enough; we need to know how and why, for ecological reasons as well as social or economic ones.What will the project actually involve?The precise form will be defined as the work proceeds, but the term 'green prescriptions' covers a whole range of possible interventions where doctors - GPs and clinicians - get patients to engage with nature and monitor the effects. It can be understood as a course of treatment, or a preventative activity. Why involve natural scientists?The answer is in three parts. Firstly, people engaging with nature, - either just on their own or through organisations, is an everyday occurrence. But increasingly people involved in health are looking at 'green prescriptions' as a course of treatment. They need to know, from research scientists, what works best. The health benefit of nature is the result of a subtle and complex relationship, and it does not derive merely from being in it, but by understanding it, and from interacting within it in different ways. Secondly, vice versa; those natural scientists who model and calculate the value to health from nature need to understand this complexity to improve their studies. So expertise needs to be transferred in both directions. Thirdly, there is another dimension to this which has not been looked at much; what are the ecological impacts, the changes to ecosystems and the 'services' they provide, of increasing green prescriptions? Are there risks or possible problems? The assumption is that it is 'all good', and in both science and policy, assumptions need to be challenged. How would, or could, people interact with nature differently? Again it's important to let ideas run freely at this initial stage, but this might involve such things as: working with scientists; outdoor counselling and therapy; and nature apps tied to exercise monitors. What examples are there, and what is the business potential?At the moment we have examples of GPs using the 'Natural Health Service' to put patients in touch with community resources. It is ad hoc, and the impact - whether on nature or on health - is not well captured. Nearly all conservation volunteering does not involve either scientific or health input. By closing the circle and using insight from scientific researchers (and only natural science, but also social and medical science; we want to join up across disciplines as much as possible), as well as from doctors, there is scope for improving the business of existing providers, and even creating new economic activity, for example through the opportunities created by mobile electronic devices and digital media. For example, Surfers Against Sewage are creating an app that provides health researchers with epidemiological data on hepatitis infections in real time. This is the kind of activity that natural scientists could benefit from too, and the kind of thing I think this project can deliver.
主要目的是什么?它将企业、科学家和卫生专业人员聚集在一起,分享他们的知识,并形成新的项目伙伴关系。该项目将同时为自然的价值和管理提供新的见解,并改善人们的健康。这是在增加自然科学研究的社会和经济影响这一更广泛目标的背景下进行的。一些相关主题包括:生态学;进化和共同进化发生的方式;微生物在土壤中的功能;动物的行为方式;以及自然界提供防洪、虫害控制和碳储存等“服务”的方式。如果是关于环境研究,那么为什么要关注健康呢?健康对我们的幸福和经济至关重要。英国国内生产总值的10%用于医疗和社会保健;这意味着对于那些能够找到降低整体成本的方法的人来说,存在商机。光说我们知道大自然可以改善健康是不够的;我们需要知道如何以及为什么,出于生态原因以及社会或经济原因。确切的形式将随着工作的进行而定义,但“绿色处方”一词涵盖了一系列可能的干预措施,医生-全科医生和临床医生-让患者与自然接触并监测效果。它可以被理解为一个疗程,或预防性活动。为什么要让自然科学家参与?答案分为三个部分。首先,人们与自然接触,无论是自己还是通过组织,都是每天都会发生的事情。但越来越多的健康人士将“绿色处方”视为一种治疗方法。他们需要从研究科学家那里知道什么最有效。大自然的健康益处是一种微妙而复杂的关系的结果,它不仅仅来自于身处其中,而是通过理解它,以及以不同的方式与之互动。其次,反之亦然;那些模拟和计算自然对健康价值的自然科学家需要了解这种复杂性,以改进他们的研究。因此,专业知识需要双向转移。第三,还有另一个方面,这还没有被太多的关注;什么是生态影响,生态系统的变化和'服务',他们提供的,越来越多的绿色处方?是否存在风险或可能的问题?假设是,它是“一切都好”,在科学和政策,假设需要挑战。人与自然的互动方式会有什么不同?同样重要的是,在这个初始阶段让想法自由发挥,但这可能涉及到这样的事情:与科学家合作;户外咨询和治疗;和自然应用程序绑定到运动监视器。有哪些例子,商业潜力是什么?目前,我们有全科医生使用“自然健康服务”让病人接触社区资源的例子。它是临时性的,其影响--无论是对自然还是对健康--都没有得到很好的捕捉。几乎所有的保护志愿工作都不涉及科学或健康投入。通过关闭循环并利用科学研究人员(只有自然科学,但也包括社会科学和医学科学;我们希望尽可能多地跨学科联合起来)以及医生的洞察力,可以改善现有供应商的业务,甚至创造新的经济活动,例如通过移动的电子设备和数字媒体创造的机会。例如,Surfers Against Sewage正在创建一个应用程序,为健康研究人员提供真实的肝炎感染的流行病学数据。这是自然科学家也可以从中受益的活动,也是我认为这个项目可以提供的东西。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
Dan Bloomfield其他文献
Dan Bloomfield的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
{{ truncateString('Dan Bloomfield', 18)}}的其他基金
Developing a Nature and Health Hub for Cornwall
为康沃尔郡开发自然与健康中心
- 批准号:
NE/P01237X/1 - 财政年份:2016
- 资助金额:
$ 12.61万 - 项目类别:
Fellowship
OPEN: To accelerate economic and social impact of NERC science in human health and wellbeing by improving and targeting knowledge exchange (EXTENSION)
开放:通过改善和瞄准知识交流,加速 NERC 科学对人类健康和福祉的经济和社会影响(扩展)
- 批准号:
NE/N005317/1 - 财政年份:2015
- 资助金额:
$ 12.61万 - 项目类别:
Fellowship
相似海外基金
Games, Heritage, Arts, & Sport: the economic, social, and cultural value of the European videogame ecosystem (GAMEHEARTS)
游戏、遗产、艺术、
- 批准号:
10104584 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 12.61万 - 项目类别:
EU-Funded
Bridging Economic Demands with Social Responsibility: A Deep Dive into SMFDI's Production-Driven CSR Initiatives
连接经济需求与社会责任:深入探讨 SMFDI 的生产驱动型企业社会责任计划
- 批准号:
24K20993 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 12.61万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
Games, Heritage, Arts, & Sport: the economic, social, and cultural value of the European videogame ecosystem (GAMEHEARTS)
游戏、遗产、艺术、
- 批准号:
10105059 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 12.61万 - 项目类别:
EU-Funded
GAMEHEARTS: The economic, social and cultural value of the European videogame ecosystem
GAMEHEARTS:欧洲视频游戏生态系统的经济、社会和文化价值
- 批准号:
10106999 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 12.61万 - 项目类别:
EU-Funded
University of Louisville Biomedical Integrative Opportunity for Mentored Experience Development -PREP (UL-BIOMED-PREP)
路易斯维尔大学生物医学综合指导经验开发机会 -PREP (UL-BIOMED-PREP)
- 批准号:
10557638 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 12.61万 - 项目类别:
Economic and social integration of immigrants in Japan: gender differences in behaviors and outcomes
日本移民的经济和社会融合:行为和结果的性别差异
- 批准号:
23K01432 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 12.61万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Decision Regarding Aspiration, Belief, and Social Economic Status in Education and Job Market
关于教育和就业市场的愿望、信仰和社会经济地位的决定
- 批准号:
2858422 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 12.61万 - 项目类别:
Studentship
Trial of a harm reduction strategy for people with HIV who smoke cigarettes
针对吸烟的艾滋病毒感染者的减害策略试验
- 批准号:
10696463 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 12.61万 - 项目类别:
A comparative evaluation of overdose prevention programs in New York City and Rhode Island
纽约市和罗德岛州药物过量预防计划的比较评估
- 批准号:
10629749 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 12.61万 - 项目类别: