权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Using data to compare the health impact of mobility infrastructure in cities (just what the doctor ordered)

使用数据比较城市移动基础设施对健康的影响（正是医生所吩咐的）

基本信息

批准号：
NE/N017935/1
负责人：
Nick Tyler
金额：
$ 3.18万
依托单位：
University College London
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2015
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2015 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=NE%2FN017935%2F1
关键词：
Using data compare health impact

项目摘要

This research looks to exploring the appropriate model and methodology for a scenario appraisal tool which will utilize data to assess mobility infrastructure designs in relation to health benefits in developed countries. This will be achieved by testing the emerging model and methodology on several case study sites in different countries. There are three stages:1. Benchmarking / 'check up'Existing site area / mobility infrastructure will be assessed according to BRE's emerging Healthy Cities Index indicators and compared to current performance across the city and in other similar cities worldwide2. Opportunities and constraints assessment / 'diagnostics'Options for alternative mobility infrastructure and potential constraints are identified and compared with local priorities and easy-wins. -3. Design testing / 'prognosis'New design proposals can be tested against the base case (i.e. existing site area) and assessed using the same defined indicators / measures for health and other benefits. We propose the following methodology and research stages (see excel spreadsheet):1. General overview / trends on mobility infrastructure and health2. Definition of key relationships between health benefits and mobility infrastructure with reference to co-benefits across other social, economic and environmental considerations. 3. Selection of existing best practice studies with regards to mobility infrastructure and the benefits identified in the previous phase. 4. Identify measures and indicators for enabling the scenario's benchmarking purposes and identification of opportunities / constraints. 5. Analysis / review of existing tools / methodology - this includes identifying existing tools / methodologies, gaps / opportunities and the market. 6. Analysis / review of data - this includes existing data, data gaps and data requirements and quality. 7. Development of the methodology to enable the scenario tool development at the three stages of benchmarking (check-up), identifying opportunities / constraints (diagnosis) and testing scenarios (surgery). 8. Testing the methodology using existing and available software and tools on one or two project test case studies - 'proof of concept'.9. Research / Technical reporting10. Communicating research: development of marketing material and dissemination internally and externally

这项研究旨在探索适当的模式和方法，为一个场景评估工具，将利用数据来评估流动性基础设施的设计与发达国家的健康福利。这将通过在不同国家的几个案例研究地点测试新出现的模式和方法来实现。有三个阶段：1.将根据BRE新兴的健康城市指数指标评估现有的场地面积/移动基础设施，并与整个城市和全球其他类似城市的当前表现进行比较2。机会和制约因素评估/“诊断”确定替代移动基础设施和潜在制约因素的选项，并与当地优先事项和容易获胜的方案进行比较。-3.设计测试/“预测”新的设计建议可以根据基本情况（即现有场地面积）进行测试，并使用相同的健康和其他效益指标/措施进行评估。我们提出了以下方法和研究阶段（见Excel电子表格）：1。移动基础设施和健康的一般概述/趋势2。根据其他社会、经济和环境因素的共同效益，确定健康效益和交通基础设施之间的关键关系。3.选择关于移动基础设施和前一阶段确定的好处的现有最佳实践研究。4.确定措施和指标，以实现设想方案的基准目标，并确定机会/制约因素。5.分析/审查现有工具/方法----这包括确定现有工具/方法、差距/机会和市场。6.数据分析/审查-这包括现有数据、数据差距以及数据要求和质量。7.制定方法，以便在基准测试（检查）、确定机会/制约因素（诊断）和测试情景（手术）这三个阶段开发情景工具。8.在一个或两个项目测试案例研究中使用现有的和可用的软件和工具测试方法-“概念证明”。研究/技术报告10.传播研究成果：编制营销材料并在内部和外部传播