The Mind in Crisis: The politicisation of the mind in China 1949-2013
The Mind in Crisis: The politicisation of the mind in China 1949-2013
批准号:
1923299
负责人:
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Studentship
财政年份:
2017
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2017 至 --
中文摘要
自改革开放以来,中国的自杀率有两组令人费解的统计数据。第一,根据2002年发表在《柳叶刀》上的一项研究,从1995年至1999年,农村自杀率比城市自杀率高3-5倍,女性自杀率高于男性(Philips,2002年)。第二个令人困惑的统计数据是,在《柳叶刀》报告发表后的几年里,中国的总体自杀率从2010年的每10万人37.8人下降到每10万人3人多一点(经济学人2014)。我认为,通过研究中国自杀和心理健康的更广泛的话语,可以为这种转变提供更广泛的背景,并将我们对中国自杀和心理健康的理解扩展到家庭领域之外,正如吴飞所看到的那样,并根据涂尔干或福柯的观点,更清楚地理解社会在自杀和心理健康中的作用,但在现代中国背景下。因此,它可能会对自杀学以及我们对社会力量和话语如何作用于政治行为者的理解产生更广泛的影响。
英文摘要
Since reform and opening China's suicide rate has thrown up two puzzling sets of statistics. The first is that, according to a study published in the Lancet in 2002, from 1995-1999 rural suicides were 3-5 times more prevalent than urban suicides, and females killed themselves more than men (Philips 2002). The second puzzling statistic is that in the years following the Lancet report the overall suicide rate in China plummeted, from 37.8 per 100,000 in 2010 to just over 3 per 100,000 (Economist 2014). I propose that by looking at the wider discourse of suicide and mental health in China it can serve to provide a wider context for this shift, and to expand our understanding of suicide and mental health within China beyond the realm of the family, as seen by Wu Fei, and to create a clearer understanding of the role of society in suicide and mental health, as per Durkheim or Foucault, but in a modern Chinese context. As such, it may have implications wider for suicidology and for our understandings of how social forces and discourses work on political actors.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金