Achieving Social Justice for Psychiatric Survivors: Capabilities and Advance Consent in Mental Health Law

为精神病幸存者实现社会正义：精神卫生法中的能力和事先同意

• 批准号: 1928486
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Birmingham
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2017
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2017 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-1928486
• 关键词: Achieving; Social; Justice; Psychiatric; Survivors

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) requires contracting states to create mechanisms that support and involve psychiatric survivors in health-related decisions. Advance consent to mental health treatment is a special type of supported decision-making by which a person binds themselves for the future treatment. Advance consent could apply in instances where a person is thought not to have mental capacity to make their own decisions or at the point of mental health relapse. Proposals to introduce advance consent in the mental health context have become a contemporary and timely challenge for law makers in England & Wales. In March 2017, the Law Commission (England & Wales) issued the Mental Capacity and Deprivation of Liberty report, where it recommended the introduction of an advance consent provision that would have allowed a person to consent to future treatment arrangements that would have otherwise amounted to a deprivation of liberty. No provision of this nature has been included in the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill. In the Wessely review of the Mental Health Act (December 2018), the introduction of an Advance Choice Document has been recommended, which would allow psychiatric survivors to voice their views about any future inpatient care and treatment. The question of advance consent to be admitted to hospital was also considered by the Wessely review, but the report stopped short of making firm recommendations on this issue. Significant changes to advance decisions in mental health and mental capacity law may, therefore, be forthcoming. A lack of empirical evidence thus far has prevented advance consent from being given statutory footing. As advance consent is gaining its momentum on the global scale more countries like India, Netherlands, Germany and Austria have developed their laws on advance consent to mental health treatment. Jurisdictions turn to the example of British Columbia, Canada where we find that advance consent to mental health treatment has been available since 1996. In addition, Canada is the most CRPD compliant country making it an interesting example for other jurisdiction to turn to in order to develop advance consent provisions compatible with international law. In 2018, the Council of Canadian Academies published a report on the State of Knowledge on Advance Requests for Medical Assistance in Dying. The report looks at the workings of advance consent in mental health and it is suggested that the mechanism is working well and is not causing any issues. However, it is admitted that the evidence is lacking and qualitative research is needed to create a more comprehensive picture of how advance consent is working in practice. This thesis addresses complex socio-legal questions pertinent to advance consent by conceptually drawing on the capabilities approach to social justice and by conducting crucial empirical research. To assess the desirability, functionality and legal effectiveness of advance consent in English law, this thesis aims to draw on narrative and photo-elicitation interviews conducted throughout England and Wales with psychiatric survivors like people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or clinical depression. However, only empirical research into the system available in British Columbia is capable of shedding light into how advance consent is working in practice and to address and mitigate gaps/issues that might emerge from empirical research in England & Wales. Thus, as part of my PhD, I intend to conduct overseas fieldwork in Canada with psychiatric survivors who made or used advance consent provisions. In turn, this thesis with its much needed and novel approach to the study of advance consent, will have a potential to be of global relevance.

联合国《残疾人权利公约》（CRPD）要求缔约国建立机制，支持精神病幸存者并使其参与与健康有关的决定。预先同意精神健康治疗是一种特殊类型的支持决策，一个人通过这种决策约束自己未来的治疗。事先同意可适用于一个人被认为没有精神能力作出自己的决定或精神健康复发的情况。在精神卫生领域引入事先同意的建议已成为英格兰和威尔士立法者面临的当代和及时的挑战。2017年3月，法律委员会（英格兰和威尔士）发布了《精神能力和剥夺自由》报告，建议引入事先同意条款，允许一个人同意未来的治疗安排，否则将构成剥夺自由。《精神行为能力（修订）条例草案》并没有包括这类性质的规定。在Wessely对《精神卫生法》（2018年12月）的审查中，建议引入预先选择文件，这将允许精神病幸存者就未来的住院护理和治疗发表意见。Wessely审查也考虑了事先同意入院的问题，但该报告没有就此问题提出明确的建议。因此，可能即将对精神健康和精神能力法作出重大改变。迄今为止，由于缺乏经验证据，事先同意无法获得法定地位。随着事先同意在全球范围内获得势头，印度、荷兰、德国和奥地利等更多国家制定了关于事先同意精神健康治疗的法律。司法管辖区以加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省为例，我们发现自1996年以来，精神健康治疗可获得事先同意。此外，加拿大是最符合《残疾人权利公约》的国家，这使其成为其他司法管辖区在制定符合国际法的事先同意条款时可以借鉴的一个有趣的榜样。2018年，加拿大科学院理事会发布了一份关于死亡医疗援助提前请求的知识状况的报告。该报告研究了预先同意在精神健康方面的作用，并建议该机制运作良好，不会引起任何问题。然而，人们承认，缺乏证据，需要进行定性研究，以更全面地了解事先同意在实践中如何发挥作用。本论文旨在探讨复杂的社会法律问题，有关推进同意的概念上借鉴能力的方法，社会正义和进行重要的实证研究。为了评估英国法律中事先同意的可取性、功能性和法律的有效性，本文旨在利用英格兰和威尔士各地对精神分裂症、双相情感障碍或临床抑郁症患者等精神病幸存者进行的叙事和照片启发式访谈。然而，只有对不列颠哥伦比亚省现有制度的实证研究才能揭示事先同意在实践中的作用，并解决和减轻英格兰和威尔士实证研究中可能出现的差距/问题。因此，作为我的博士学位的一部分，我打算在加拿大进行海外实地考察，与精神病幸存者谁作出或使用事先同意的规定。反过来，这篇论文以其急需的和新颖的方法来研究事先同意，将有可能具有全球意义。