Regeneration or Gentrification? An Intersectional Analysis of Institutional Discrimination in the Regeneration of Tottenham, Post 2011 Riots

再生还是绅士化？

• 批准号: 1931354
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Leicester
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2017
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2017 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-1931354
• 关键词: Regeneration; Gentrification; Intersectional; Analysis; Institutional

In response to the 2011 Tottenham Riot Haringey Council developed a housing regeneration policy, 'A Plan for Tottenham', to correct the underlying issues. However, Tottenham residents, business owners and local interest groups are worried that the plan is resulting in the social and economic dislocation of the existing, predominantly BME, community (Dillon, 2015; Inside Housing, 2015; The Tottenham Independent, 2013). The aim of this research is to critically examine the housing outcomes and consequent socioeconomic impacts of the Tottenham plan on black and white residents in order to explore whether the policy has disproportionately produced racial disparities in outcomes and impacts for the BME population in the ward of Tottenham Hale. Tottenham Hale was designated as a Housing Zone in February 2015 and 2,000 new homes are being built in the area. The objectives of this study are:- To contribute to the literature on gentrification induced displacement- To allow the 'voice' of the marginalized to be heard- To identify areas for policy reform.The research questions include:1. What policy ideas did Haringey draw on in the goals of the Tottenham plan and why? 2. What have the impacts of the plan been on housing outcomes for both white and BME residents in Tottenham Hale?3. What have the socio-economic impacts of the plan been on both white and BME residents in Tottenham Hale?4. What are the implications of these impacts for more socially just urban regeneration?Relevant LiteratureThis research, which utilises the concepts of institutional racism and intersectionality, builds on the literature on the impacts of state-led gentrification in the UK (eg. Lees, 2003,2008; Lees et al, 2008; Watt, 2009), and literature from the US on how gentrification disproportionately impacts black and other ethnic minority groups (eg. Freeman, 2006; Hyra, 2008). It seeks to answer Lees's (2016) recent call for research into race and gentrification in the British context that considers but does not copy the contextually specific work from the US. It also seeks to move the literature on gentrification-induced displacement forward, there have been very few studies to date and they are rather dated (eg Marcuse, 1986; Atkinson, 2000). There have been no studies of black gentrification in the UK to date, this research will fill that gap. There is limited knowledge of how racial politics have played out in British regeneration schemes.

为了应对2011年托特纳姆骚乱，哈林盖理事会制定了一项住房再生政策，“托特纳姆计划”，以纠正根本问题。然而，托特纳姆居民、企业主和当地利益集团担心，该计划将导致现有的以BME为主的社区的社会和经济混乱（狄龙，2015年;内部住房，2015年;托特纳姆独立报，2013年）。本研究的目的是严格审查住房成果和随之而来的社会经济影响的托特纳姆计划对黑人和白色居民，以探讨该政策是否产生了不成比例的种族差异的结果和影响的BME人口在病房的托特纳姆黑尔。托特纳姆黑尔于2015年2月被指定为住房区，该地区正在建造2,000套新住房。本研究的目的是：-为关于中产阶级化导致的流离失所的文献做出贡献-让边缘化群体的“声音”得到倾听-确定政策改革的领域。哈林盖在托特纳姆计划的目标中借鉴了什么政策理念，为什么？2.该计划对托特纳姆黑尔的白色和BME居民的住房结果有什么影响？3.该计划对托特纳姆黑尔的白色和BME居民的社会经济影响是什么？4.这些影响对更具有社会公正性的城市复兴有何影响？相关文献这项研究，利用制度种族主义和交叉性的概念，建立在文献的影响，国家领导的绅士化在英国（如。Lees，2003，2008; Lees et al，2008; Watt，2009），以及美国关于中产阶级化如何不成比例地影响黑人和其他少数民族群体的文献（例如，Freeman，2006; Hyra，2008）。它旨在回答Lees（2016）最近呼吁在英国背景下研究种族和绅士化，考虑但不复制美国的特定背景工作。它还试图推动文献的中产阶级化引起的流离失所，有很少的研究，到目前为止，他们是相当过时的（如马尔库塞，1986年;阿特金森，2000年）。到目前为止，英国还没有关于黑人中产阶级化的研究，这项研究将填补这一空白。关于种族政治如何在英国的复兴计划中发挥作用的知识有限。