Ethical Issues In Multinational Clinical Research

跨国临床研究中的伦理问题

• 批准号: 6546584
• 负责人: ezekiel J emanuel
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: CLINICAL CENTER
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 至
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/6546584
• 关键词: AIDS therapy; HIV infections; attitude; behavioral /social science research tag; clinical research; clinical trials; ethics; experience; health care service evaluation; health science research analysis /evaluation; health services research tag; health surveys; human subject; interleukin 2; international cooperation; interview; method development; perception; questionnaires

This study seeks to inform deliberation and resolution of ethical issues related to multinational clinical research through interviewing various participants of the ESPRIT study. ESPRIT is a multinational collaborative clinical trial of Interleukin-2 in HIV disease. Our study will interview four groups participating in ESPRIT: (1) chairs of the Institute Review Board (IRB) or REC which reviewed ESPRIT; (2) principal investigators implementing ESPRIT; (3) persons who negotiated the Cooperative Project Assurances with the U.S. government; and (4) selected subjects participating in ESPRIT. The purpose is to compare their attitudes and experiences regarding important ethical issues associated with ESPRIT. Protocol has been reviewed by the NIAID IRB. Survey instruments are being developed and pretested. There has been substantial controversy about the ethics of human subjects research in developing countries. This study is designed to provide an ethical framework for clinical research in developing countries and investigate empirically some of the more controversial issues in this research. In conjunction with African clinical researchers we are examining the question of what constitutes benefits of clinical research and what level of benefits are necessary for ethical multi-national research. Similarly we are trying to define a full set of principles and benchmarks to provide a general framework for determining when clinical research in developing countries is ethical. The empirical research is focusing on whether subjects in African countries are coerced into participating in research, whether they understand the details, including the risks and enefits, of the research and how participants in clinical research perceive the benefits of the research

本研究旨在通过采访ESPRIT研究的不同参与者，为跨国临床研究相关伦理问题的审议和解决提供信息。ESPRIT是一项关于白细胞介素-2在HIV疾病中的多国合作临床试验。我们的研究将采访参与ESPRIT的四个群体：（1）审查ESPRIT的研究所审查委员会（IRB）或REC的主席;（2）实施ESPRIT的主要研究者;（3）与美国政府谈判合作项目Asphalt的人员;以及（4）参与ESPRIT的选定受试者。其目的是比较他们的态度和经验的重要伦理问题与ESPRIT。方案已由NIAID IRB审查。正在开发和预先测试调查工具。 在发展中国家，关于人类受试者研究的伦理问题一直存在很大争议。本研究旨在为发展中国家的临床研究提供一个伦理框架，并对该研究中一些更具争议性的问题进行实证调查。我们正在与非洲临床研究人员一起研究什么是临床研究的好处以及什么样的好处是符合伦理的多国研究所必需的问题。同样，我们正试图定义一整套原则和基准，为确定发展中国家的临床研究何时符合伦理提供一个总体框架。实证研究的重点是非洲国家的受试者是否被迫参与研究，他们是否了解研究的细节，包括研究的风险和益处，以及临床研究的参与者如何看待研究的益处。