Assessing the policy impact of Brexit on the UK's Sexual/Reproductive Health Rights of LGBT+ people: a qualitative study

点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要

Focusing on Brexit as a catalyst of significant policy change (Fahy and all, 2017), this research aims toexplore the impact leaving the EU will have on the sexual/reproductive health rights of LGBT+ people.The embedded nature of EU membership leaves multiple areas of cooperatively developed policyopen to change and potential regression as oversight is lost from EU institutions through thisgovernance gap (Renshaw, 2018) (National Assembly for Wales, 2018). The impact of leaving the EUon the legal, cultural and social protections of LGBT+ reproductive rights are unknown - this researchproject intends to start filling in this gap.Thesis Statement/ Initial Literature ReviewThis project aims to describe the impact of Brexit on the sexual/reproductive health rights of Lesbian,Gay, Bisexual, Trans and other (LGBT+) people in the UK. These rights refer "to a diversity of civil,political, economic, social and cultural rights affecting the sexual and reproductive life of individualsand couples" (United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, 2014, p 21). Thisexpands the scope of this research to encompass more than health policy, but wider societal issues toreflect on the depth of factors associated with sexual/reproductive health rights.These depths of factors shows the complexity at hand in researching this issue, but with commitmentsto these rights at both national (Public Health England, 2015) and international (United NationsPopulation Fund, 2018) levels, this research's work is relevant to aid these existing policy goals bydiscovering the currently unknown relationships of Brexit's different disturbances to thesexual/reproductive safeguards for LGBT+ people in the UK. Moreso, these policy disturbances fromBrexit not only effect wider socio-economic factors but are also present in a newly emerging policyregime that demands a deeper exploration of the qualms for LGBT+ people post-Brexit (Guerrina andMasselot, 2018) (Simpkin and Mossialos, 2017).Understanding these spectral issues, from civil to economic, surrounding LGBT+ health has been apersistent theme well before Brexit (Bränström and Star, 2015). It's understanding has beenintertwined with national and international commitments to sexual/reproductive care as well as being akey area of study amongst research institutions (ESRC, 2018) as its evolving development demandscontinuous research (Bachtler and Begg, 2017).Brexit poses a significant catalyst to this evolution as policies/practises are displaced from currentunderstood models of governance to a brave new world of 'purely' domestic governance. Conversely,as London (2008) points towards in 'What is a human-rights based approach to health and does it matter?' rights are impacted across borders by a variety of actors amongst different policy levels.That, contrary to the rhetoric of regaining total sovereignty via Brexit (Gordon, 2016), thesexual/reproductive health rights of LGBT+ in the UK will always be shaped by actors from local toglobal levels through the UK's ongoing interaction with the world. It is, however, the sudden (and notthe total) removal of the EU as a direct policy shaper to an indirect one that leaves a governance gapfor LGBT+ health rights and a vacuum of primary interest for this research.