A Gramscian Analysis of Global Health Law to Ensure Justice in Responding to Antimicrobial Resistance

抗微生物药物耐药性（AMR）是当今世界面临的最深刻问题之一，需要作出公正的全球应对。全球卫生法可以在解决这一危机方面发挥重要作用，尽管学术和灰色抗微生物药物耐药性文献在很大程度上忽略了考虑其资本主义的分析前假设，这些假设不可避免地影响到实现全球卫生正义。我建议审查全球卫生法在抗菌素耐药性问题上追求或阻碍司法公正的方式和程度。为此，我将开发一个葛兰西的视角，通过它来理论化和分析（理论和实践）对抗生素耐药性的法律回应的例子，这有可能为学术界和实践提供见解。

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the most profound problems the world faces today that requires a just global response. Global health law can play a significant role in resolving this crisis, though the academic and grey AMR literature has largely neglected to consider their capitalistic preanalytical assumptions that inevitably impact upon the achievement of global health justice. I propose to examine the ways and extent to which global health law can pursue or hinder justice in AMR. To do so, I will develop a Gramscian lens through which to theorise and analyse (theoretical and practical) examples of legal responses to AMR, which has the prospect to provide insights for academia and practice to build upon.