Explaining immunisation against violence against the person in Wales and its implications for a narrative approach to evidence-based policy-making

解释威尔士针对个人的暴力免疫及其简化，以基于证据的政策制定的叙事方法。有了这个博士学位，我将寻求从一个不同的角度看待基于证据的政策制定，通过研究那些接种了暴力疫苗的人，即使他们可能处于危险之中，而不是那些已经犯下暴力行为的人。在我作为犯罪与安全研究所(CSRI)的研究助理期间，我负责创建一个探索性编码框架，并建立一个威尔士安全保护报告的储存库--即家庭凶杀案、精神健康凶杀案和成人实践审查。作为我研究的一部分，我看到了一种生活模式的趋势，作为审查过程的一部分，肇事者和家庭成员被约谈。我坚信这将从进一步的研究中受益。在这些审查的边缘有许多人处于危险之中，但他们从未遭受过暴力或自己实施过暴力。从政策的角度看这些不同的叙述，可以帮助我们从政策的角度来看待“未知的未知因素”，并且可以更好地为政策制定和保障措施提供信息。虽然我个人对家庭内的致命暴力感兴趣，但我尤其感兴趣的是与这位学生一起探索非致命的暴力和共生问题。我们经常看到，处于家庭凶杀案审查中心的人有在家外对他人(通常是警察)实施暴力的记录。在精神健康凶杀案审查中，我们看到了类似的行为模式--尽管每个MHHR不一定是家庭性质的，但往往有很大的重叠，每一项罪行都会有DHR和MHHR。在成人执业审查中也有这种针对暴力的“免疫”元素，其中高危个人出现在报告的叙事中，但没有犯下任何罪行。我想对这个学生采取一种混合方法--使用终身访谈和焦点小组来建立叙事，并以二次数据分析为坚实基础，将这与我们已经知道的威尔士人际暴力联系起来。

Explaining immunisation against violence against the person in Wales and itsimplications for a narrative approach to evidence-based policymaking.With this PhD studentship, I would seek to look at evidence-basedpolicymaking from a different perspective by studying those who areimmunised against violence, even though they may be at risk, rather thanthose who are already committing said violence.During my time as a Research Assistant at the Crime and Security ResearchInstitute (CSRI) I was responsible for creating an exploratory coding frameworkand building a repository for Welsh safeguarding reports - namely DomesticHomicide, Mental Health Homicide and Adult Practice reviews.As part of my research, I saw a trend in life patterns where perpetrators andfamily members were interviewed as part of the review process. I stronglybelieve that this would benefit from further study. There are many in theperiphery of these reviews who are at risk, yet never suffer violence orperpetrate it themselves. Looking at these alternative narratives can helpreveal 'unknown unknowns' from a policy perspective and can serve to betterinform both policy creation and safeguarding measures.Although my personal interest is in fatal violence inside the home, I would beparticularly interested to explore issues of non-fatal violence and comorbiditywith this studentship. Often, we see those that are at the centre of domestichomicide reviews have a record of prior violence that they have perpetratedoutside the home on others (usually Police officers). With mental healthhomicide reviews, we see a similar pattern of behaviour - even though everyMHHR is not necessarily domestic in nature, there is often a large overlap thatwill see a DHR and an MHHR being commissioned for each offence. There arealso elements of this 'immunisation' against violence in adult practice reviews,where high risk individuals feature in the narrative of the reports but have notcommitted any crimes.I should like to undertake a mixed-methods approach with this studentship -using lifetime interviews and focus groups for narrative establishment, with astrong grounding in secondary data analysis to relate this to what we alreadyknow about interpersonal violence in Wales.