Explaining immunisation against violence against the person in Wales and its implications for a narrative approach to evidence-based policy-making

解释威尔士针对暴力侵害行为的免疫接种及其对基于证据的决策的叙述方法的影响

• 批准号: 2434445
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: CARDIFF UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2020
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2020 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2434445
• 关键词: Explaining; immunisation; against; violence; person

Explaining immunisation against violence against the person in Wales and itsimplications for a narrative approach to evidence-based policymaking.With this PhD studentship, I would seek to look at evidence-basedpolicymaking from a different perspective by studying those who areimmunised against violence, even though they may be at risk, rather thanthose who are already committing said violence.During my time as a Research Assistant at the Crime and Security ResearchInstitute (CSRI) I was responsible for creating an exploratory coding frameworkand building a repository for Welsh safeguarding reports - namely DomesticHomicide, Mental Health Homicide and Adult Practice reviews.As part of my research, I saw a trend in life patterns where perpetrators andfamily members were interviewed as part of the review process. I stronglybelieve that this would benefit from further study. There are many in theperiphery of these reviews who are at risk, yet never suffer violence orperpetrate it themselves. Looking at these alternative narratives can helpreveal 'unknown unknowns' from a policy perspective and can serve to betterinform both policy creation and safeguarding measures.Although my personal interest is in fatal violence inside the home, I would beparticularly interested to explore issues of non-fatal violence and comorbiditywith this studentship. Often, we see those that are at the centre of domestichomicide reviews have a record of prior violence that they have perpetratedoutside the home on others (usually Police officers). With mental healthhomicide reviews, we see a similar pattern of behaviour - even though everyMHHR is not necessarily domestic in nature, there is often a large overlap thatwill see a DHR and an MHHR being commissioned for each offence. There arealso elements of this 'immunisation' against violence in adult practice reviews,where high risk individuals feature in the narrative of the reports but have notcommitted any crimes.I should like to undertake a mixed-methods approach with this studentship -using lifetime interviews and focus groups for narrative establishment, with astrong grounding in secondary data analysis to relate this to what we alreadyknow about interpersonal violence in Wales.

解释针对威尔士人的暴力的免疫接种及其对循证决策的叙述方法的简化。有了这个博士学位，我将通过研究那些对暴力免疫的人，寻求从不同的角度看待循证决策，即使他们可能处于危险之中，而不是那些已经犯下上述暴力行为的人。在我担任犯罪与安全研究所（CSRI）研究助理期间，我负责创建一个探索性的编码框架，并建立一个威尔士保护报告的存储库-即家庭凶杀，精神健康凶杀和成人实践评论。作为我研究的一部分，我看到了生活模式的一种趋势，其中肇事者和家庭成员被采访作为审查过程的一部分。我坚信这将得益于进一步的研究。在这些评论的外围，有许多人处于危险之中，但他们从未遭受暴力或自己犯下暴力。从政策的角度来看，这些不同的叙述可以帮助我们发现“未知的未知”，并为政策制定和保障措施提供更好的信息。虽然我个人的兴趣是家庭内的致命暴力，但我特别有兴趣探索非致命暴力和与这个学生的共病问题。通常，我们看到那些处于家庭灭门审查中心的人有他们在家庭外对他人（通常是警察）实施暴力的记录。在精神健康凶杀案审查中，我们看到了类似的行为模式--尽管每个MHHR不一定是家庭性质的，但往往有很大的重叠，每项罪行都会委托一名DHR和一名MHHR。也有这种“免疫”对成人实践审查中的暴力的元素，其中高风险的个人在报告的叙述功能，但没有犯下任何罪行。我想采取混合方法的方法与这个学生身份-使用终身访谈和焦点小组的叙述建立，在二级数据分析的坚实基础，将其与我们已经知道的关于威尔士的人际暴力。