Diphtheria & Anthrax Toxins: Mechanisms of Cell Entry

超出所提供的空间。 白喉毒素、炭疽毒素（保护性抗原[PA]）的催化结构域。致死因子[LF]和水肿因子[EF]）和肉毒杆菌神经毒素的所有血清型遵循类似的进入它们各自靶向真核细胞的胞质溶胶的途径。在每种毒素与其特异性细胞表面受体结合后，毒素通过网格蛋白包被的凹坑中的受体介导的内吞作用内化到细胞中。在早期内分泌区室酸化之后，它们各自的催化结构域向胞质溶胶的易位由至少一个功能性跨膜结构域促进。使用体外易位试验，我们最近已经证明，一个细胞易位因子（CTF）复杂的白喉毒素C-结构域的早期内体囊泡的膜传递所需的。白喉、炭疽毒素和肉毒杆菌毒素A的X射线结构是已知的。这些毒素的BLAST分析表明，在每种毒素中存在12个氨基酸的“进入基序”。本申请提出继续研究白喉毒素C-结构域、假定的“进入基序”的丙氨酸扫描诱变，以及炭疽致死因子的体外transloaction测定的开发。在白喉毒素、炭疽毒素和肉毒杆菌毒素的情况下，它们各自的结构功能域和它们的作用模式是已知的;然而，它们各自的催化结构域从酸化的早期内体的内腔易位到胞质溶胶所需的分子机制的详细理解仍然是难以捉摸的。只有少数研究直接关注毒素催化结构域进入的易位的分子机制。在白喉毒素的情况下，这些研究的结果导致了两个不同的假设机制的催化结构域易位。第一种是基于这样的假设，即毒素本身携带足够的结构信息来介导其催化结构域跨内吞囊泡膜的易位。相反，第二种假设是基于这样的发现，即毒素的两个结构域与胞质易位因子（CTF）复合物的组合对于生产性易位是必需的。我们使用纯化的早期内体与融合蛋白毒素，DAB 3891 L-2，严格检查这两种假设。性能现场=

EXCEED THE SPACE PROVIDED. The catalytic domains of diphtheria toxin, anthrax toxins (protective antigen [PA]. lethal factor [LF] and edema factor [EF]) and all serotypes of botulinum neurotoxin follow a similar route of entry into the cytosol of their respective targeted eukaryotic cells. Following binding of each toxin to their specific cell surface receptor, the toxin is internalized into the cell by receptor-mediated endocytosis in clathrin coated pits. Following acidification of an early endosmal compartment the translocation of their respective catalytic domains to the cytosol is facilitated by a at least a functional transmembrane domain. Using an in vitro translocation assay, we have recently demonstrated that a cellular translocation factor (CTF) complex is required for the delivery of the diphtheria toxin C-domain across the membrane of early endosomal vesicles. The X-ray structure of diphtheria, anthrax toxin, and botulinum toxin A is known. BLAST analysis of these toxins has suggested the presence of 12 amino acid "entry motif" in each toxin. The present application proposes the continuing study of diphtheria toxin C-domain, alanine scanning mutagenesis of the putative "entry motif", and the development of an in vitro transloaction assay for anthrax lethal factor. In the case of diphtheria toxin, anthrax toxins, and botulinum toxins a great deal is known of their respective structure function domains and their mode of action; however, a detailed understanding of the molecular mechanism(s) required for translocation of their respective catalytic domains from the lumen of acidified early endosomes to the cytosol have remained elusive. Only a few studies have focused directly on the molecular mechanism(s) of translocation f the toxin catalytic domain entry have been published. In the case of diphtheria toxin, the results of these studies have led to two divergent hypothetical mechanisms of catalytic domain translocation. The first is based on the hypothesis that the toxin itself carries sufficient structural information to mediate translocation of its catalytic domain across the endocytic vesicle membrane. In contrast, the second hypothesis is based on findings that both structural domains of the toxin in combination with a cytosolic translocation factor (CTF) complex are necessary for productive translocation. We have used purified early endosomes charged with the fusion protein toxin, DAB3891L-2, to critically examine both hypotheses. PERFORMANCE SITE ========================================Section End===========================================