Method at the Margins: Innovating in race-conscious research in Britain

边缘方法：英国种族意识研究的创新

• 批准号: 2569973
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Warwick
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2021
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2021 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2569973
• 关键词: Method; Margins; Innovating; race; conscious

Over the past decades, researchers and research institutions have reflected on the public value of their work (Nurse, 2015). Race-conscious scholars across the social sciences have shed light on how race/ism and the legacies of empire have shaped how research is produced and used (Arday & Mizra, 2018; Saini, 2019). Despite the impact of this scholarship - and growing support for a more equitable agenda - little space exists to support learning from this work (Palmer, 2016). This PhD will take up a focus on how research is made, with and for whom, as central to the social benefits of knowledge production (Flinders, 2020). It aims to build on work by Tuhiwai Smith (2012) and others who address methodology as a site from which to examine research practice, the contexts in which research problems are conceptualised, and the implications of research for participants and communities. It proposes an examination of the marginal intellectual traditions that inform 'race-conscious' scholarship in Britain and will investigate in three case studies how race-conscious scholars are positing new possibilities for the social impacts of research.The project will be guided by two overarching research questions. RQ 1. What approaches to methodology and method appear in the work of race-conscious scholars and intellectuals in Britain, 1960-present?RQ 2. What approaches to methodology and method are being used by race-conscious scholars today, in three case study research centres?A systematically conducted literature review of race-conscious writing from 1960 to present will establish a theoretical and analytic framework for the study. This will build on existing work and include relevant non-academic archival sources (such as the Birmingham CCCS archives; publications of the Institute of Race Relations), journal and database searches. Three research centres with a substantial focus on race/ism will be selected for case study. Documentary analysis and interviews will explore research projects. An approach to case comparison will be developed from iterative analysis of emergent themes (May, 2011).The project aims to generate a theoretically and historically grounded understanding of key developments in race-conscious research in Britain in relation to research method, practice, participation and ethics. ReferencesArday. J & Mizra, H. S. (2018) Dismantling Race in Higher Education. Eds Arday. J & Mizra, H. S. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Flinders, M. (2020) Fit for the Future: Research Leadership Matters. Swindon: ESRC.Gough, D. & Thomas, J. (2016) 'Systematic reviews of research in education: aims, myths and multiple methods' Review of Education. Vol. 4, No. 1. pp 84-102.May, T. (2011) Social research: Issues, Methods and Research. Fourth Edition. New York: Open University Press.Nurse, P. (2015) Ensuring a successful research endeavour: review of the UK research councils by Paul Nurse, London: Department for Business, Innovation & Skills.Palmer, L. A. (2016) 'The absence of black studies in Britain' in Blackness in Britain. London: Routledge.Saini, A. (2019) Superior: The Return of Race Science. London: Harper Collins Publishers.Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2012) Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Second Edition. London: Zed Books.Warmington, P. (2009) Taking race out of scare quotes: race-conscious social analysis in an ostensibly post-racial world, Race Ethnicity and Education, 12:3, 281-296, DOI: 10.1080/13613320903178253

在过去的几十年里，研究人员和研究机构已经反思了他们工作的公共价值（护士，2015）。社会科学领域具有种族意识的学者揭示了种族/主义和帝国遗产如何影响研究的产生和使用（Arday & Mizra，2018; Saini，2019）。尽管这项奖学金的影响-以及越来越多的人支持更公平的议程-很少有空间支持从这项工作中学习（Palmer，2016）。这个博士将重点关注研究是如何进行的，与谁和为谁，作为知识生产的社会效益的核心（弗林德斯，2020年）。它旨在以Tuhiwai Smith（2012）和其他人的工作为基础，他们将方法论作为检查研究实践、研究问题概念化的背景以及研究对参与者和社区的影响的场所。它提出了一个检查的边缘知识传统，告知“种族意识”的学术在英国，并将调查在三个案例研究如何种族意识的学者提出新的可能性的社会影响的研究。该项目将由两个首要的研究问题。RQ 1. 1960年至今，在英国具有种族意识的学者和知识分子的工作中，出现了哪些方法论和方法？RQ 2.在三个案例研究中心，今天有种族意识的学者正在使用什么方法和方法？本文通过对1960年至今有关种族意识写作的文献进行系统的回顾，为本文的研究建立了一个理论和分析框架。这将建立在现有工作的基础上，并包括相关的非学术档案来源（例如伯明翰CCCS档案;种族关系研究所的出版物）、期刊和数据库搜索。将选定三个重点研究种族主义问题的研究中心进行个案研究。文件分析和访谈将探讨研究项目。将通过对新兴主题的迭代分析来开发案例比较方法（2011年5月）。该项目旨在对英国种族意识研究在研究方法、实践、参与和道德方面的关键发展产生理论和历史基础的理解。 参考Arday。J & Mizra，H. S.（2018）拆除种族在高等教育。艾德·阿迪J & Mizra，H. S.伦敦：Palgrave Macmillan.Flinders，M.（2020）适合未来：研究领导力的事项。斯温登：ESRC。高夫，D。&托马斯，J.（2016）“教育研究的系统评价：目的，神话和多种方法”教育评论。第4卷，第1号。pp 84- 102. May，T.（2011）社会研究：问题，方法和研究。第四版。纽约：开放大学出版社。护士，P.（2015）确保一个成功的研究努力：审查英国研究理事会保罗护士，伦敦：商业部，创新与技能。帕尔默，L。A.（2016）“在英国的黑人研究的缺席”在英国的黑人。伦敦：伦敦大学出版社.（2019）上级：种族科学的回归。伦敦：哈珀柯林斯出版社。（2012）非殖民化方法：研究与土著人民。第二版。伦敦：泽德图书。沃明顿，P。（2009年）采取种族恐慌报价：种族意识的社会分析在一个表面上后种族世界，种族种族和教育，12：3，281-296，DOI：10.1080/13613320903178253