Exploring the Complex and Contradictory Role(s) of Women within the UK Far Right

探索英国极右翼女性复杂且矛盾的角色

• 批准号: 2576775
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Sussex
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2021
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2021 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2576775
• 关键词: Exploring; Complex; Contradictory; Role; Women

Social movement studies have recently turned their attention to the far right anddocumented the variety of actors and their action repertoires such as party politics, streetmobilisation and online activism (Castelli Gattinara and Pirro, 2018). A key characteristic farright movements share is their nativism or nationalism, excluding certain 'others' from theirconcept of the nation-state (ibid.). There has been a worrying growth in far right support inrecent years, and even if in the UK this has only led to limited electoral gains, they have seensome considerable successes such as Brexit. This is a problem not only politically, asmainstream parties react by shifting further to the right, but for society, as far right ideologythreatens social stability (Jackman and Volport, 1996).The rise of the far right has therefore been a concern for politicians and social scientistsalike, leading to an increase in academic interest in nearly every aspect of the movement(Mudde, 2002; Ford, Goodwin and Cutts, 2011; Ford and Goodwin, 2014; Portelinha andElcheroth, 2016; Inglehart and Norris, 2017, 2019; Miller-Idriss, 2017; Doerr, 2017; Leidig,2020). Despite this proliferation of research, there is comparatively little work in this field ongender. Furthermore, those that do focus on this topic are guided by questions of the gendergap in far right support, as men are more likely to formally participate in the movement thanwomen (Givens, 2004; Rippeyoung, 2007; Harteveld et al, 2015; Spierings and Zaslove,2017). More recently, studies have also considered how the far right narrow this gender gapby instrumentalising gender discourses to 'legitimise' their anti-immigration and antitransgendermobilisation (Fekete, 2006; Akkerman and Hagelund, 2007; Erel, 2018; Duinaand Carson, 2019; Phipps, 2020).

社会运动研究最近将注意力转向极右翼，并记录了各种各样的行动者及其行动，如政党政治、街头动员和在线行动主义（Castelli Gattinara和Pirro， 2018）。极右翼运动的一个关键特征是他们的本土主义或民族主义，将某些“他者”排除在他们的民族国家概念之外（同上）。近年来，极右翼的支持率出现了令人担忧的增长，尽管这在英国只带来了有限的选举收益，但他们取得了一些相当大的成功，比如英国退欧。这不仅是一个政治问题，因为主流政党的反应是进一步向右转移，而且是一个社会问题，因为极右意识形态威胁到社会稳定（Jackman和Volport， 1996）。因此，极右翼的崛起一直是政治家和社会科学家关注的问题，导致对该运动几乎每个方面的学术兴趣增加（Mudde, 2002; Ford， Goodwin和Cutts, 2011； Ford和Goodwin, 2014； Portelinha和elcheroth, 2016； Inglehart和Norris， 2017, 2019; Miller-Idriss, 2017; Doerr, 2017; Leidig,2020）。尽管这方面的研究越来越多，但在性别方面的研究相对较少。此外，那些关注这一主题的人受到极右翼支持的性别差距问题的指导，因为男性比女性更有可能正式参与这一运动（Givens, 2004; Rippeyoung, 2007； Harteveld等人，2015；Spierings和Zaslove，2017）。最近，研究还考虑了极右翼如何通过利用性别话语来缩小这种性别差距，从而使他们的反移民和反跨性别动员“合法化”（Fekete, 2006； Akkerman和Hagelund, 2007; Erel, 2018; Duinaand Carson, 2019; Phipps, 2020）。