课题基金 / 基金详情

When Natives Outnumber Settlers: Apartheid in French Algeria, South Africa and Palestine

When Natives Outnumber Settlers: Apartheid in French Algeria, South Africa and Palestine
当当地人数量超过定居者时:法属阿尔及利亚、南非和巴勒斯坦的种族隔离
批准号:
2582703
负责人:
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Studentship
财政年份:
2021
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2021 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
This dissertation project aims to reexamine the paradigm of apartheid by comparing legal regimesinstalled in three seemingly different settler-colonial situations that have, nonetheless, an interesting traitin common: the existence of a large population of natives that outnumbers the settlers. Settler hegemonyis arguably contingent on the adoption and preservation of racialized legal configurations that serve tomaintain control over the native population in all colonies. Nonetheless, little attention has been made tothe possible correlation between demographic superiority of the native population in a certain colony andthe vigor of racialized laws that came to be applied there. In many settler colonies of the Americas andOceania, this question was admittedly rendered irrelevant by the dramatic collapse in the nativepopulation due to the spread of pandemics and wide-scale massacres following European settlement.There are three settler-colonial situations, however, in which the natives did not face the same destiny:South Africa, French Algeria and Palestine.In all these places, settlers were arguably in need of a radical design of the legal system to maintain theirsuperiority over a large native population, including the adoption of measures geared toward maintainingracial segregation and domination. In the case of South Africa, these measures assumed an extreme formthat soon came to be identified under the notorious category of Apartheid. While this term has beenhistorically linked to the South African context, there have been new discussions in recent years about itsrelevance for analyzing Israeli practices in Palestine. Debates about the accuracy of this categorizationswing their pendulum in a dualistic range that is delimited between historical comparisons on one hand,and a universalized legal definition of apartheid on the other. This study tries to disrupt this equilibriumby acknowledging the importance of historical analysis in developing a more nuanced and diversifiedparadigm of apartheid that can retain its relevance across seemingly different places. For this purpose, itjuxtaposes the example of French Algeria and those of South Africa and Palestine with a view toreconceptualizing apartheid as a racialized system of legal measures and practices that are primarilyconditioned by demographic anxieties.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金