Towards the reconciliation of retributivism and rehabilitation in the face of social exclusion

面对社会排斥，实现报应主义与康复的调和

• 批准号: 2751066
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Cambridge
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2022
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2022 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2751066
• 关键词: Towards; reconciliation; retributivism; rehabilitation; face

Von Hirsch's retributivism and rehabilitation have moved in the last half decade from conflicting to consistent paradigms. I aim to show that they can also be construed as interconnected. My assumption is simple: although the requirement ofrespecting moral agency and autonomy creates, in the abstract, only negative, defensive obligations, in the face of severe social exclusion respect is impossible without attention to offenders' welfare. In the context of a 'high-crime, high-punishment, high-inequality' equilibrium, retributivism can be re-interpreted as incorporating (i) an obligation to rehabilitate and (ii) the necessary sentencing framework and, thereby, construed as integral to efforts of fosteringequilibria of inclusion. Moreover, a reconciliation between retributivism and rehabilitation could provide a normative justification for a conception of 'humanitarian' rehabilitation that has different implications for policy than its widelyaccepted consequentialist counterpart. It entails that 'caring' for offenders through rehabilitation is not merely a means for reducing recidivism, nor a mere ideological preference, but a precondition for justified punishment in the face of socialexclusion. There are thus strong normative reasons for preferring the Good Lives Model and desistance paradigm of rehabilitation, as well as for systematically addressing the pains of desistance and the pains of risk-focused rehabilitation.

在过去的五年里，冯·赫希的报复主义和康复主义已经从相互冲突的范式转变为一致的范式。我的目的是表明，它们也可以被解释为相互关联的。我的假设很简单：虽然尊重道德能动性和自主权的要求在抽象上只产生消极的、防御性的义务，但在严重的社会排斥面前，如果不关注罪犯的福利，尊重是不可能的。在“高犯罪率、高惩罚率、高不平等性”均衡的背景下，报复主义可以被重新解释为包含（i）改造的义务和（ii）必要的量刑框架，从而被解释为促进包容均衡的努力的组成部分。此外，报复主义和康复之间的和解可以为“人道主义”康复的概念提供规范性的理由，这种概念对政策的影响不同于其广泛接受的后果主义对应物。这意味着通过改造“照顾”罪犯不仅仅是减少累犯的一种手段，也不仅仅是一种意识形态上的偏好，而是在面临社会排斥时合理惩罚的一个先决条件。因此，有强有力的规范性理由，更喜欢良好的生活模式和停止的康复范式，以及系统地解决停止的痛苦和以风险为重点的康复的痛苦。