Modalities of the Absolute: Spinoza, Hegel, Marx

绝对的形态：斯宾诺莎、黑格尔、马克思

• 批准号: 2858800
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Kingston University
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2022
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2022 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2858800
• 关键词: Modalities; Absolute; Spinoza; Hegel; Marx

The central focus of the proposed research is the relation between modal logic and the thinking of the Absolute in Spinoza, Hegel and Marx. It will ask how far Marx has a figure of the Absolute in his philosophy corresponding to the Third Kind of Knowledge in Spinoza, and to the Absolute Knowing (or the "Absolute Method") in Hegel. The research will investigate whether approaching all three philosophical systems through the problem of modal logic offers a complementary reading of the ways they engage with the problem of the absolute.The research will first compare Spinoza's Intuitive Knowledge (as intellectual love of God; identity between God and Nature) with Hegel's Absolute Knowing (beyond representational thought/separation of subject and object) and Immanent Self-Determination, and then both with the understanding of the Revolutionary Subject in Marx (going beyond the separation of subject(ivity) and object(ivity)). Investigating the convergences and divergences between them and following Balibar's reading of all three of them as transindividual thinkers who articulate ontology, politics, ethics and political economy as constitutive function of relations, this research will ask how far the methodological approaches to modal logic in all three philosophical systems bind together the absolute moments in each of them. By investigating whether the Absolute moments in all three systems propose an alternative modality to Aristotelian/Kantian/Enlightenment modal logic, the research will investigate how far this alternative logic allows these thinkers to propose an alternative notion of immanent social rationality. It will also ask whether this alternative notion of immanent social rationality can inform an interdisciplinary approach to human sociality as a potentially feminist politics of care/ethics immanent to social being, merging distinctive philosophical categories such as ontology, epistemology, politics and ethics.

本研究的中心焦点是模态逻辑与斯宾诺莎、黑格尔和马克思的绝对思想之间的关系。它将问，马克思在其哲学中的绝对形象在多大程度上与斯宾诺莎的第三类知识以及黑格尔的绝对知识（或“绝对方法”）相对应。该研究将调查通过模态逻辑问题接近所有三个哲学体系是否可以对它们处理绝对问题的方式提供补充解读。该研究将首先将斯宾诺莎的直觉知识（作为对上帝的理智之爱；上帝与自然之间的同一性）与黑格尔的绝对知识（超越表征思想/主客分离）和内在自决进行比较，然后将两者与马克思对革命主体的理解（超越 主体（能力）和客体（能力）的分离。调查他们之间的趋同和分歧，并遵循巴里巴尔对他们三位作为超个人思想家的解读，他们将本体论、政治、伦理和政治经济学阐明为关系的本构函数，本研究将询问这三个哲学体系中模态逻辑的方法论途径在多大程度上将它们各自的绝对矩结合在一起。通过调查所有三个系统中的绝对矩是否提出了亚里士多德/康德/启蒙模态逻辑的替代模态，该研究将调查这种替代逻辑在多大程度上允许这些思想家提出内在社会理性的替代概念。它还将询问这种内在社会理性的替代概念是否可以为人类社会性的跨学科方法提供信息，作为一种潜在的女权主义关怀/伦理政治，内在于社会存在，融合了本体论、认识论、政治和伦理等独特的哲学类别。