Stultification, emancipation, Brexit and Jacques Ranciere

愚昧、解放、英国脱欧和雅克·朗西埃

• 批准号: 2870154
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Newcastle University
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2023
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2023 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2870154
• 关键词: Stultification; emancipation; Brexit; Jacques; Ranciere

Contemporary philosophers have argued that explanation, or some forms of explanation, leadto stultification, namely the assumption that people are incapable of independent thought andinitiative which inhibits self-emancipatory efforts. Going beyond critics such as Chambers andProposal Summary: Cornelissen, this dissertation investigates the nature and cause of stultification and its relation to emancipation in the context of Northern English working classes voting for Brexit, an eventI which led many commentators to regard such voters as ignorant, to the dismay of others. In I order to develop a deeper understanding of stultification, this dissertation puts Ranciere's work into dialogue with qualitative social research.

当代哲学家认为，解释或某种形式的解释，导致坚固化，即人们无法独立思想和原始性，从而抑制了自我解释性的努力。这本论文超越了诸如钱伯斯（Chambers）和普罗帕萨森（Proposal）摘要等批评者：玉米片（Cornelissen），在北方英语工人阶级投票支持英国脱欧的情况下，调查了现场化的性质和原因及其与解放的关系，这是一种事件，这使许多评论家认为这些选民无知，使其对其他人感到沮丧。在我为了建立对统治化的更深入的理解中，这项论文使兰奇耶尔的工作与定性的社会研究对话。