Comparing Personality Disorder Models: FFM and DSM-IV

比较人格障碍模型：FFM 和 DSM-IV

• 批准号: 7128109
• 负责人: DOUGLAS B SAMUEL
• 金额: $ 3.39万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2005
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2005-12-17 至 2008-12-16
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/7128109
• 关键词: American; Biological Models; Categories; Client; Clinical; DSM-IV; DSM-V; Diagnostic; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual; Dimensions; Disadvantaged; Disease; Disease model; Emotional; Equipment and supply inventories; Feedback; Individual; Interview; Introversion; Link; Methodology; Methods; Modeling; Neurotic Disorders; Nomenclature; Outpatients; Participant; Patient Self-Report; Personality; Personality Disorders; Population; Psychotherapy; Publishing; Rate; Reporting; Research; Research Personnel; Structure; Syndrome; System; Training; Work; Writing; base; design; experience; trait

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The proposed study will allow the current DSM-IV categorical model of personality disorders to be compared directly to the Five-Factor model (FFM) of personality, on the basis of temporal stability within a clinical setting, convergent and discriminant validity, and clinical utility. The FFM is the most heavily researched of the dimensional models that have been proposed as an alternative for the current DSM-IV system. The DSM- IV and FFM ratings will be assessed in a group of 75 self-referred individuals who are currently receiving outpatient psychotherapy for a personality disorder using the four primary methods of assessment used in clinical practice: unstructured clinical interview by the client's therapist, semi-structured interview by a trained researcher, self-report inventory and informant report. Additionally, the same participants will be assessed again after six months to examine the temporal stability of each model. Finally, the therapists who are treating these clients and providing the unstructured clinical interview ratings will also provide feedback on the clinical utility of each model. It is hoped that this research will help to better conceptualize personality difficulties and ultimately a more coherent and useful diagnostic system.

描述（由申请人提供）：拟议的研究将允许当前的DSM-IV人格障碍分类模型直接与人格的五因素模型（FFM）进行比较，基于临床环境中的时间稳定性，收敛效度和判别效度以及临床实用性。FFM是被提议作为当前DSM-IV系统的替代方案的维度模型中研究最多的。DSM- IV和FFM评分将在一组75名自我推荐的个体中进行评估，这些个体目前正在接受门诊人格障碍心理治疗，使用临床实践中使用的四种主要评估方法：由客户治疗师进行的非结构化临床访谈，由训练有素的研究人员进行的半结构化访谈，自我报告清单和线人报告。此外，同样的参与者将在六个月后再次接受评估，以检查每个模型的时间稳定性。最后，治疗这些客户并提供非结构化临床访谈评级的治疗师也将对每个模型的临床效用提供反馈。希望这项研究将有助于更好地概念化人格困难，并最终建立一个更连贯和有用的诊断系统。