Systems of Support (SOS) to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-up
加强结肠癌筛查和随访的支持系统 (SOS)
基本信息
- 批准号:8105785
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 25.93万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:美国
- 项目类别:
- 财政年份:2007
- 资助国家:美国
- 起止时间:2007-07-01 至 2013-08-31
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:AddressAdultAgeBlindedCaringCharacteristicsChronic CareClient satisfactionClinicClinic VisitsClinical Trials DesignCohort StudiesColon CarcinomaColonoscopyColorectal CancerCounselingDataEffectivenessEnrollmentFecesFlexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopyHealthHealth Care CostsHealth PersonnelHealth PlanningHealthcareHealthcare SystemsHome environmentIncentivesIncidenceIndividualInterventionLettersMailsManaged CareMeasuresMedicalModelingMorbidity - disease rateNursing Care ManagementPatientsPersonsPhysiciansPreparationPreventiveProcessProcess MeasureProductivityProviderRandomizedRandomized Controlled TrialsRegistered nurseRegistriesReportingResearch DesignResearch PersonnelScreening for cancerScreening procedureSeriesSupport SystemSystemTelephoneTestingTimeVisitWashingtonbasechronic care modelcolorectal cancer screeningcomparative effectivenesscompare effectivenesscost effectivenesseffectiveness trialfollow-upgroup interventionimprovedinnovationintervention effectmortalityoutreachpatient home carepatient orientedpreventprimary outcomeprototypesatisfactiontreatment as usualtrial comparinguptakevisual cycle
项目摘要
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) decreases colorectal cancer (CRC) morbidity and mortality, yet remains underutilized. Systems of Support to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-up (SOS) is a 2-year randomized controlled trial designed to increase: (1) CRC screening and (2) follow-up of positive screening tests. The Chronic Care Model and the Preventive Health Model inform study design. For this Competitive Revision we propose two new ancillary aims to address the following questions: 1) Does the medical home model modify (i.e. enhance or reduce) the effectiveness of the SOS intervention? Primary Aim #1: To compare SOS systems-level intervention effect in clinics before and after MH implementation. We hypothesize that SOS systems-level CRCS rates will continue be higher than UC (MH alone) in year 2, but CRCS rates will be modified (lessoned or enhanced) by characteristics of clinics and their implementation of MH components. To test this hypothesis we will collect data on covariates related to process measures related to implementation of the MH and clinic characteristics. 7 Primary outcomes will include to what degree CRCS and FOBT rates are modified by MH implementation and clinic factors. 2) Is a continued systems-level intervention required to maintain increases in CRCS for those choosing annual FOBT? Primary Aim #2: To determine the durability and long-term impact of SOS systems-level automated interventions over time. We hypothesize that continued SOS automated interventions are needed for patients to remain current for FOBT screening over time. We also hypothesize that individuals who have previously completed in years 1-2, will still be more likely to complete CRCS, than those not receiving SOS automated interventions. To test these hypotheses we propose in year 3 to randomize patients in the active intervention groups (auto, assist, and care managed) who are still eligible for CRCS (have not had a colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy) to either: A. Stopped Auto or B. Continued Auto systems-level FOBT interventions 7 Primary outcomes include CRCS and FOBT rates, categorically (yes/no) in year 3 and as person-time assessments of appropriate CRCS and FOBT coverage in years 1-3 This study will efficiently address these questions by taking advantage of an existing study cohort.
PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Screening people age 50 to 75 prevents colon cancer from starting and dying from it, but almost half have not been screened. This study is testing how much help patients need to get colon cancer screening done. In the second year of the study, the health plan made changes to how clinics deliver health care. This change is called the "Medical Home" and doctors are given more time to see patients and medical assistants check to see if patients are due for screening tests, such as colon cancer screening, and help at visits or mail letters. We will study whether "Medical Home" care increases colon cancer screening. A second aim of this study will to be to find out if people who choose to do stool cards at home, need to receive these in the mail every year to stay current for screening.
描述(由申请人提供):结直肠癌筛查(CRCS)降低结直肠癌(CRC)的发病率和死亡率,但仍未得到充分利用。支持增加结直肠癌筛查和随访的系统(SOS)是一项为期2年的随机对照试验,旨在增加:(1)结直肠癌筛查和(2)阳性筛查试验的随访。慢性护理模式和预防健康模式为研究设计提供了信息。对于这一竞争性修订,我们提出了两个新的辅助目标来解决以下问题:1)医疗之家模式是否修改(即增强或降低)SOS干预的有效性?主要目的1:比较SOS系统水平的干预效果,在诊所之前和之后的MH实施。我们假设SOS系统级别的CRCS率在第2年将继续高于UC(单独MH),但CRCS率将根据诊所的特点及其MH组件的实施而改变(减少或提高)。为了验证这一假设,我们将收集与实施MH和临床特征相关的过程措施相关的协变量数据。主要结局将包括CRCS和FOBT率在多大程度上受到MH实施和临床因素的影响。2)对于那些选择每年FOBT的患者,是否需要持续的系统级干预来维持CRCS的增加?主要目标2:随着时间的推移,确定SOS系统级自动干预措施的持久性和长期影响。我们假设,随着时间的推移,患者需要持续的SOS自动干预来保持当前的FOBT筛查。我们还假设,与没有接受SOS自动干预的个体相比,之前完成1-2年的个体仍然更有可能完成CRCS。为了验证这些假设,我们建议在第3年将仍有资格接受CRCS(未接受结肠镜检查或乙状结肠镜检查)的积极干预组(自动、辅助和护理管理)患者随机分为以下两组:主要结果包括第3年的CRCS和FOBT率,分类(是/否),以及第1-3年适当的CRCS和FOBT覆盖率的个人评估。本研究将利用现有的研究队列有效地解决这些问题。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
Beverly Beth Green其他文献
Beverly Beth Green的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
{{ truncateString('Beverly Beth Green', 18)}}的其他基金
Self-Testing Options in the era of Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer: the STEP trial
宫颈癌初级 HPV 筛查时代的自我检测选择:STEP 试验
- 批准号:
10661709 - 财政年份:2019
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Self-Testing Options in the era of Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer: the STEP trial
宫颈癌初级 HPV 筛查时代的自我检测选择:STEP 试验
- 批准号:
10448439 - 财政年份:2019
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Self-Testing Options in the era of Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer: the STEP trial
宫颈癌初级 HPV 筛查时代的自我检测选择:STEP 试验
- 批准号:
10216202 - 财政年份:2019
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Collaborative Behavioral e-Care to Decrease Cardiovascular Risk (e-Compare)
协作行为电子护理可降低心血管风险(电子比较)
- 批准号:
7937755 - 财政年份:2009
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Systems of Support (SOS) to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-up
加强结肠癌筛查和随访的支持系统 (SOS)
- 批准号:
7909655 - 财政年份:2009
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Collaborative Behavioral e-Care to Decrease Cardiovascular Risk (e-Compare)
协作行为电子护理可降低心血管风险(电子比较)
- 批准号:
7833997 - 财政年份:2009
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Systems of Support (SOS) to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-up
加强结肠癌筛查和随访的支持系统 (SOS)
- 批准号:
8470772 - 财政年份:2007
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Systems of Support (SOS) to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-up
加强结肠癌筛查和随访的支持系统 (SOS)
- 批准号:
8705421 - 财政年份:2007
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Systems of Support (SOS) to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-up
加强结肠癌筛查和随访的支持系统 (SOS)
- 批准号:
8870306 - 财政年份:2007
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Systems of Support (SOS) to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-up
加强结肠癌筛查和随访的支持系统 (SOS)
- 批准号:
8079546 - 财政年份:2007
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
相似海外基金
Developing a Young Adult-Mediated Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening among Rural Screening Age-Eligible Adults
制定年轻人介导的干预措施,以增加农村符合筛查年龄的成年人的结直肠癌筛查
- 批准号:
10653464 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Estimating adult age-at-death from the pelvis
博士论文研究:从骨盆估算成人死亡年龄
- 批准号:
2316108 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Determining age dependent factors driving COVID-19 disease severity using experimental human paediatric and adult models of SARS-CoV-2 infection
使用 SARS-CoV-2 感染的实验性人类儿童和成人模型确定导致 COVID-19 疾病严重程度的年龄依赖因素
- 批准号:
BB/V006738/1 - 财政年份:2020
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Research Grant
Transplantation of Adult, Tissue-Specific RPE Stem Cells for Non-exudative Age-related macular degeneration (AMD)
成人组织特异性 RPE 干细胞移植治疗非渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性 (AMD)
- 批准号:
10294664 - 财政年份:2020
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Sex differences in the effect of age on episodic memory-related brain function across the adult lifespan
年龄对成人一生中情景记忆相关脑功能影响的性别差异
- 批准号:
422882 - 财政年份:2019
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Operating Grants
Modelling Age- and Sex-related Changes in Gait Coordination Strategies in a Healthy Adult Population Using Principal Component Analysis
使用主成分分析对健康成年人群步态协调策略中与年龄和性别相关的变化进行建模
- 批准号:
430871 - 财政年份:2019
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Studentship Programs
Transplantation of Adult, Tissue-Specific RPE Stem Cells as Therapy for Non-exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration AMD
成人组织特异性 RPE 干细胞移植治疗非渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性 AMD
- 批准号:
9811094 - 财政年份:2019
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Study of pathogenic mechanism of age-dependent chromosome translocation in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia
成人急性淋巴细胞白血病年龄依赖性染色体易位发病机制研究
- 批准号:
18K16103 - 财政年份:2018
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Literacy Effects on Language Acquisition and Sentence Processing in Adult L1 and School-Age Heritage Speakers of Spanish
博士论文研究:识字对西班牙语成人母语和学龄传统使用者语言习得和句子处理的影响
- 批准号:
1823881 - 财政年份:2018
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Adult Age-differences in Auditory Selective Attention: The Interplay of Norepinephrine and Rhythmic Neural Activity
成人听觉选择性注意的年龄差异:去甲肾上腺素与节律神经活动的相互作用
- 批准号:
369385245 - 财政年份:2017
- 资助金额:
$ 25.93万 - 项目类别:
Research Grants