Minimal technologies for hearing aid success in elderly adults

描述（由申请人提供）：本研究的目标是提高听力卫生保健的可负担性和可及性-这是NIDCD/NIH的优先事项。在那些可以从助听器放大效果中受益的人中，只有不到十分之一的轻度听力损失患者和不到十分之四的中度至重度听力损失患者获得并使用助听器。人们不寻求干预的最常见的原因之一是助听器的高成本。目前市场上有各种配备相对低端技术的低成本助听器。因此，研究听力受损的老年人是否需要昂贵的高端技术来获得最佳的助听器效果是很重要的，他们通常比年轻的听众有更少的沟通需求。本研究的第一个目的是研究技术水平与双侧轻中度听力损失的老年人助听器的实际有效性之间的关系，重点研究定向麦克风和数字降噪技术。由于(1)这两种听力技术的效果高度依赖于听力情境，(2)经过长达一个月的现场试验，老年听众不太能够正确回忆情境依赖效应，我们将采用一种具有足够情境分辨率且不受回忆偏差影响的真实世界结果测量系统来评估真实世界的助听器效果。该系统包括：(1)主观的生态瞬间评估，包括使用现代无线智能手机和互联网在实时和自然环境中对听众的感知进行重复采样；(2)一个客观的自动化系统，通过分析听众在日常活动中所做的录音，可以表征和模拟听众的自然交流行为和环境。由于该系统尚未用于评估听力技术，本研究的第二个目的是探索如何使用我们的结果测量系统，无线智能手机和互联网来确定听力保健的成功。在研究的每个现场试验部分，参与者将佩戴配备低端或高端定向麦克风和数字降噪技术的助听器四周，然后使用我们的结果测量系统评估助听器一周的成功。将审查和比较这些技术的好处，以确定老年听众所需的最低技术水平，这反过来将促进更适当和负担得起的听力保健。的可行性、可靠性和合规性

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The goal of this research is to increase the affordability and accessibility of hearing health care-a priority of the NIDCD/NIH. Of those who could benefit from hearing aid amplification, less than one in ten with mild hearing loss and less than four in ten with moderate-to-severe hearing loss acquire and use hearing aids. One of the most often reported reasons that people do not seek intervention is hearing aids' high cost. Currently a variety of low-cost hearing aids equipped with relatively low-end technologies are available on the market. Thus, it is important to examine if hearing-impaired elderly adults, who typically have fewer communication demands than younger listeners, need expensive high-end technologies to attain optimal hearing aid benefits. The first aim of this research is to investigae the relationship between technology level and the real-world effectiveness of hearing aids in elderly adults with bilateral mild to moderate hearing loss, focusing on directional microphone and digital noise reduction technologies. Because (1) the effects of these two hearing technologies are highly dependent on the listening situation and (2) elderly listeners are less able to correctly recall the situational-dependent effect after month-long field trials, we will employ a real-world outcome measure system that has sufficient situational resolution and is not subject to recall bias to assess real-world hearing aid effectiveness. The system consists of (1) a subjective Ecological Momentary Assessment, which involves repeated sampling of listeners' perception in real time and in natural environments using modern wireless smartphones and the Internet, and (2) an objective, automated system that could characterize and model the listeners' natural communication behaviors and environments by analyzing the audio recordings made during the listeners' daily activities. Since this system has not been used to evaluate hearing technologies, the second aim of this research is to explore how our outcome measure system, wireless smartphones, and the Internet could be used to determine the success of hearing health care. In each field trial section of the study, participants will wear hearing aids equipped with low- or high-end directional microphone and digital noise reduction technologies for four weeks and then use our outcome measure system to assess hearing aid success for one week. The benefits of the technologies will be examined and compared to determine the minimal technology level needed by elderly listeners, which in turn will facilitate more appropriate and affordable hearing health care. The feasibility, reliability, and compliance of our assessment system will also be examined. Such information will be valuable in the implementation of automated tele-audiology, which will greatly increase the accessibility of hearing health care.