How infants use the affiliations of their caregivers to evaluate others.
婴儿如何利用照顾者的关系来评价他人。
基本信息
- 批准号:9773647
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 6.47万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:美国
- 项目类别:
- 财政年份:2018
- 资助国家:美国
- 起止时间:2018-09-01 至 2021-10-31
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:AdultAffectAgeAttentionAttitudeBehaviorCaregiversCaringChildChildhoodComplexCuriositiesDevelopmentFaceFeelingHumanIndividualInfantLanguageLearningLifeLinkMeasuresMedialMotivationMovementNear-Infrared SpectroscopyPatternPersonsPopulationPrefrontal CortexPuppetSignal TransductionSocial DevelopmentSocial EnvironmentSocial InteractionSocial PerceptionSocial ValuesStimulusSumTestingTimeWorkautism spectrum disorderinterestnovelpreferenceracial biassocialsocial groupsocial relationships
项目摘要
PROJECT SUMMARY: Human infants are faced with the challenge of learning about and engaging in their
social world, including who belongs to their social in-group. Infants can infer social relationships by observing
social interactions of others. For example, infants infer affiliation between novel individuals who speak the
same language, synchronize movement, imitate each other, or comfort the same individual (Liberman,
Woodward, & Kinzler, 2017; Powell & Spelke, 2018; Spokes & Spelke, 2017). However, little is known about
how infants apply these inferences to interactions they see in their own social environment. For example, do
infants pay attention to whom their caregivers affiliate with? Moreover, there remains several outstanding
questions about infant's perceptions of social interactions. For example, infant's inferences about imitation are
asymmetric—although 4 and 5-months-olds expect that an imitator will approach the individual they imitated,
they do not expect an individual who was imitated to approach the person who imitated them. Likewise,
although infants prefer those who imitate; they do not prefer those who are imitated (Powell, Spelke, 2018).
This could be because infants only represent 'social actors'—the individuals who perform social actions—and
not 'social targets'—the individuals whom social actions are directed toward. Or, it could be that infants prefer
good candidates for affiliative partners, and that being imitated by a stranger is not informative to that end.
After all, a person could be imitated without reciprocating or even noticing. In the current proposal three
hypotheses are tested 1) Infants use their caregivers as 'references' when evaluating new people, preferring
those who are affiliated with their caregivers 2) Infants can represent targets of affiliative social actions, but
only prefer them if the infants know the social actor 3) Infant's get 'social value' from looking at or interacting
with those who are affiliated with their caregivers. Preference will be measured through looking time and
reaching. fNIRS (functional near-infrared spectroscopy) will be used to investigate whether infants' preferences
reflect a feeling of 'social value' as opposed to curiosity or interest. Specifically, activation in the MPFC (medial
prefrontal cortex) which is associated with social value in adults, will be compared to activation in the LPFC
which is associated with processing novel information in adults. To sum, these studies will investigate a
fundamental human social motivation—to find and affiliate with those in one's immediate social in-group.
These studies will help us understand how children develop in-group biases, especially those found only in
later childhood such as racial biases. Moreover, understanding the typical developmental trajectory of these
social motivations will help us understand populations with atypical social development such as those with
autism spectrum disorder.
项目概述:人类婴儿面临着学习和参与他们的挑战。
社交世界,包括谁属于他们的社交圈。婴儿可以通过观察来推断社会关系
他人的社会互动。例如,婴儿会推断出说这种语言的新个体之间的联系。
相同的语言,同步的动作,互相模仿,或安慰同一个人(利伯曼,
Woodward,& Kinzler,2017; Powell & Spelke,2018; Spokes & Spelke,2017)。然而,人们对
婴儿如何将这些推论应用于他们在自己的社会环境中看到的互动。比如做
婴儿会注意他们的照顾者与谁有关系?此外,还有几个尚未解决的问题,
关于婴儿对社会互动的看法的问题。例如,婴儿关于模仿的推断是
不对称--尽管4个月和5个月大的婴儿期望模仿者接近他们模仿的人,
他们不希望被模仿的人接近模仿他们的人。同样地,
虽然婴儿更喜欢那些模仿的人;他们不喜欢那些被模仿的人(鲍威尔,斯佩尔克,2018)。
这可能是因为婴儿只代表“社会行动者”-执行社会行动的个体-并且
而不是“社会目标”--社会行动所针对的个人。或者婴儿更喜欢
亲密伴侣的好候选人,被陌生人模仿并不能提供信息。
毕竟,一个人可以被模仿,而不需要回报,甚至不需要注意。在目前的提案中,三
1)婴儿在评估新朋友时,会把他们的照顾者当作“参照物”,
2)婴儿可以代表附属社会行动的目标,但
只有当婴儿认识社会参与者时,他们才会更喜欢他们。3)婴儿从观看或互动中获得“社会价值”
与那些与他们的照顾者有联系的人。偏好将通过观看时间来衡量,
到达。fNIRS(功能性近红外光谱)将用于调查婴儿的偏好是否
反映了一种“社会价值”的感觉,而不是好奇心或兴趣。具体而言,MPFC中的激活(内侧
与成人社会价值相关的前额叶皮层)将与LPFC的激活进行比较
这与成年人处理新信息有关。总之,这些研究将调查一个
基本的人类社会动机--找到并与那些在自己的直接社会团体中的人联系。
这些研究将帮助我们了解儿童是如何发展内群体偏见的,特别是那些只在
比如种族歧视。此外,了解这些典型的发展轨迹,
社会动机将帮助我们了解具有非典型社会发展的人群,
自闭症谱系障碍。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
Ashley J. Thomas其他文献
Preferring the Mighty to the Meek: Toddlers Prefer Novel Dominant Agents
喜欢强大而不是温和:幼儿更喜欢新奇的主导代理人
- DOI:
- 发表时间:
2016 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
Ashley J. Thomas;M. Abramyan;A. Lukowski;Lotte Thomsen;B. Sarnecka - 通讯作者:
B. Sarnecka
Correction: No Child Left Alone: Moral Judgments about Parents Affect Estimates of Risk to Children
更正:不让孩子独自一人:对父母的道德判断影响对儿童风险的估计
- DOI:
- 发表时间:
2016 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
Ashley J. Thomas;P. Stanford;B. Sarnecka - 通讯作者:
B. Sarnecka
Ashley J. Thomas的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
{{ truncateString('Ashley J. Thomas', 18)}}的其他基金
How infants use the affiliations of their caregivers to evaluate others.
婴儿如何利用照顾者的关系来评价他人。
- 批准号:
10049242 - 财政年份:2018
- 资助金额:
$ 6.47万 - 项目类别:
相似海外基金
Hormone therapy, age of menopause, previous parity, and APOE genotype affect cognition in aging humans.
激素治疗、绝经年龄、既往产次和 APOE 基因型会影响老年人的认知。
- 批准号:
495182 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 6.47万 - 项目类别:
Investigating how alternative splicing processes affect cartilage biology from development to old age
研究选择性剪接过程如何影响从发育到老年的软骨生物学
- 批准号:
2601817 - 财政年份:2021
- 资助金额:
$ 6.47万 - 项目类别:
Studentship
RAPID: Coronavirus Risk Communication: How Age and Communication Format Affect Risk Perception and Behaviors
RAPID:冠状病毒风险沟通:年龄和沟通方式如何影响风险认知和行为
- 批准号:
2029039 - 财政年份:2020
- 资助金额:
$ 6.47万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Neighborhood and Parent Variables Affect Low-Income Preschool Age Child Physical Activity
社区和家长变量影响低收入学龄前儿童的身体活动
- 批准号:
9888417 - 财政年份:2019
- 资助金额:
$ 6.47万 - 项目类别:
The affect of Age related hearing loss for cognitive function
年龄相关性听力损失对认知功能的影响
- 批准号:
17K11318 - 财政年份:2017
- 资助金额:
$ 6.47万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Affect regulation and Beta Amyloid: Maturational Factors in Aging and Age-Related Pathology
影响调节和 β 淀粉样蛋白:衰老和年龄相关病理学中的成熟因素
- 批准号:
10166936 - 财政年份:2017
- 资助金额:
$ 6.47万 - 项目类别:
Affect regulation and Beta Amyloid: Maturational Factors in Aging and Age-Related Pathology
影响调节和 β 淀粉样蛋白:衰老和年龄相关病理学中的成熟因素
- 批准号:
9320090 - 财政年份:2017
- 资助金额:
$ 6.47万 - 项目类别:
Affect regulation and Beta Amyloid: Maturational Factors in Aging and Age-Related Pathology
影响调节和 β 淀粉样蛋白:衰老和年龄相关病理学中的成熟因素
- 批准号:
9761593 - 财政年份:2017
- 资助金额:
$ 6.47万 - 项目类别:
How age dependent molecular changes in T follicular helper cells affect their function
滤泡辅助 T 细胞的年龄依赖性分子变化如何影响其功能
- 批准号:
BB/M50306X/1 - 财政年份:2014
- 资助金额:
$ 6.47万 - 项目类别:
Training Grant
Inflamm-aging: What do we know about the effect of inflammation on HIV treatment and disease as we age, and how does this affect our search for a Cure?
炎症衰老:随着年龄的增长,我们对炎症对艾滋病毒治疗和疾病的影响了解多少?这对我们寻找治愈方法有何影响?
- 批准号:
288272 - 财政年份:2013
- 资助金额:
$ 6.47万 - 项目类别:
Miscellaneous Programs