Participatory system dynamics vs usual quality improvement: Is staff use of simulation an effective, scalable and affordable way to improve timely Veteran access to high-quality mental health care?
Participatory system dynamics vs usual quality improvement: Is staff use of simulation an effective, scalable and affordable way to improve timely Veteran access to high-quality mental health care?
批准号:
10647620
负责人:
Lindsey Eileen Zimmerman
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
2020
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2020-09-01 至 2025-09-30
关键词:
AdoptedAdoptionAreaBehaviorBudgetsBusinessesCaringChronicClinicCluster randomized trialComplexComputer AssistedCost AnalysisDataDisciplineDoseE-learningEffectivenessEngineeringEquilibriumEvidence based practiceFrontline workerGeneral PractitionersGoalsGuidelinesHealth PersonnelHealth ServicesHealth Services AdministrationHealth systemHealthcareHealthcare SystemsHourImpairmentInfrastructureInvestmentsLawsLearningMeasuresMediatingMediationMediatorMental DepressionMental HealthMental Health ServicesMethodologyMethodsModelingNotificationOutpatientsOverdoseParticipantPatientsPatternPharmacotherapyPost-Traumatic Stress DisordersProbabilityProviderPsychotherapyQuality of CareRandomizedResearchResourcesScheduleScienceSourceStatistical ComputingSuicide preventionSurveysSystemSystems TheoryTestingTheoretical StudiesTheory of ChangeTimeTrainingTranslatingUnited States Health Resources AdministrationVeteransVeterans Health AdministrationWeightaddictionarmbudget impactburnoutcostdata resourcedata warehousedynamic systemeffective therapyempowermentevidence basehigh riskimplementation researchimplementation scienceimprovedinnovationlearning engagementlearning strategymedical specialtiesmeetingsmultidisciplinaryonline resourceopioid use disorderpatient populationprogramsprototypereferral servicessimulationsynergismtreatment as usualvirtual
中文摘要
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Background: Evidence-based practices (EBPs) are the most high value treatments to meet Veterans’
addiction and mental health needs, reduce chronic impairment, and prevent suicide or overdose. Over 10
years, VA invested in dissemination of evidence-based psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies based on
substantial evidence of effectiveness as compared to usual care. Quality metrics also track progress.
Despite these investments, patients with prevalent needs, such as depression, PTSD and opioid use
disorder often don’t receive EBPs. Systems theory explains limited EBP reach as a system behavior
emerging dynamically from local components (e.g., patient demand/health service supply). Participatory
research and engagement principles guide participatory system dynamics (PSD), a mixed-methods
approach used in business and engineering, shown to be effective for improving quality with existing
resources. Significance/Impact: We propose our study in the high priority area of VA addiction and mental
health care to improve Veteran access to VA’s highest quality care. Our PSD program, Modeling to Learn
(MTL), improves frontline management of dynamic complexity through simulations of staffing, scheduling
and service referrals common in healthcare, across generalist and specialty programs, patient populations,
and provider disciplines/treatments. Innovation: Recent synthesis of VA data in the enterprise-wide SQL
Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) makes it feasible to scale participatory simulation learning activities with
VA frontline addiction and mental health staff. MTL is an advanced quality improvement (QI) infrastructure
that helps VA take a major step toward becoming a learning health care system, by empowering local
multidisciplinary staff to develop change strategies that fit to local capacities and constraints. Model
parameters are from one VA source and generic across health services. If findings show that MTL is
superior to usual VA quality improvement activities of data review with facilitators from VA program offices,
this paradigm could prove useful across VA services. The PSD approach also advances implementation
science. Systems theory explains how dynamic system behaviors (EBP reach) are defined by general
scientific laws, yet arise from idiographic local conditions. Empowering staff with systems science simulation
encourages the safe prototyping of ideas necessary for learning, increasing ongoing quality improvement
capacities, and saving time and money as compared to trial-and-error approaches. Specific Aims: 1.
Effectiveness: Test for superiority of MTL over usual QI for increasing the proportion of patients (1a)
initiating, and (1b) completing a course of evidence-based psychotherapy (EBPsy) and evidence-based
pharmacotherapy (EBPharm). 2. Scalable: (2a) Evaluate usual QI and MTL fidelity. (2b) Test MTL fidelity for
convergent validity with participatory measures. (2c) Test the participatory theory of change: Evaluate
whether 12 month period EBP reach is mediated by team scores on participatory measures. 3. Affordable:
(3a) Determine the budget impact of MTL. (3b). Calculate the average marginal costs per 1% increase in
EBP reach. Methodology: We propose a two-arm, 24-clinic (12 per arm) cluster randomized trial to test for
superiority of MTL over usual QI for increasing EBP reach. Clinics will be from 24 regional health care
systems (HCS) below the SAIL mental health median, and low on 3 of 8 SAIL measures associated with
EBPs. Computer-assisted stratified block randomization will balance MTL and usual QI arms at baseline
using Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) data. Participants will be the multidisciplinary frontline teams of
addiction and mental health providers. Next Steps/Implementation: MTL was developed in partnership
with the VA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention (OMHSP) and if shown to be effective, scalable,
and affordable for improving timely Veteran access to EBPs, MTL will be scaled nationally to more clinics by
expanding MTL online resources, and training more VA staff to facilitate MTL activities instead of usual QI.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Participatory system dynamics vs usual quality improvement: Is staff use of simulation an effective, scalable and affordable way to improve timely Veteran access to high-quality mental health care?
-
批准号:10247447
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$0.0万
-
财政年份:2020
-
负责人:Lindsey Eileen Zimmerman
-
依托单位:
Participatory System Dynamics vs Audit and Feedback: A Cluster Randomized Trial of Mechanisms of Implementation Change to Expand Reach of Evidence-based Addiction and Mental Health Care
-
批准号:10314046
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$56.99万
-
财政年份:2019
-
负责人:Lindsey Eileen Zimmerman
-
依托单位:
Participatory System Dynamics vs Audit and Feedback: A Cluster Randomized Trial of Mechanisms of Implementation Change to Expand Reach of Evidence-based Addiction and Mental Health Care
-
批准号:10538553
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$57.94万
-
财政年份:2019
-
负责人:Lindsey Eileen Zimmerman
-
依托单位:
Participatory System Dynamics vs Audit and Feedback: A Cluster Randomized Trial of Mechanisms of Implementation Change to Expand Reach of Evidence-based Addiction and Mental Health Care
-
批准号:10066337
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$57.21万
-
财政年份:2019
-
负责人:Lindsey Eileen Zimmerman
-
依托单位:
Participatory System Dynamics for Evidence-based Addiction and Mental Healthcare
-
批准号:9169543
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$22.1万
-
财政年份:2016
-
负责人:Lindsey Eileen Zimmerman
-
依托单位:
海外基金