Fostering Institutional Resources for Science Transformation: The FLORIDA-FIRST Health-science Brigade

项目总结 我们将应用系统论方法，利用参与性技术、档案数据和 建立、监控和报告佛罗里达第一旅的可持续基础设施。传统型 具有前沿参与性方法和共同要素主题的系统论方法 与协调和评价中心(CEC)合作收集数据，使参与者受益 佛罗里达-第一旅，通知FSU社区，并导致更多样化和更具生产力的科学 社区。 评价的目的将是进行创新的形成性(过程)和结束性 (结果)监测和报告佛罗里达第一旅的方法。近些年来关于生物多样性的研究进展 对合作健康科学中心的评估发现，(1)评估成功，所有 利益相关者必须对评估有重要的参与、参与和承诺；(2)包括 全面的逻辑模型；以及(3)包括评估者参加领导和核心会议，以 促进持续反馈。评价核心将满足这些建议，并负责 监测投入、资源和活动；确定执行困难；以及评估 职能活动在实现佛罗里达第一旅具体目标方面的有效性。这个 评价将侧重于评估短期和长期目标的执行情况，同时提供季度报告 快速周期评估，以最大限度地增加供资期间的增长机会。评估将会 记录计划完整性，监控进度，并向佛罗里达第一旅提供反馈 领导力和CEC。总体核心、行政核心和学院核心都有具体的目标和声明 实现这些目标的时间表。评价将持续评价实现这些目标的进展情况 并为计划领导提供及时的评估，以支持质量改进和计划 变化。评价核心将侧重于评价三个具体目标： 目标1.评估6名UMR教师的终身教职和晋升程序变化的质量和影响 (第一批)在研究中心和/或实验室，而不是传统的学术部门。 目标2.评估人力厅和人力资源管理厅之间的协调和协作程度 学院发展和促进办公室，与解决多样性、公平、包容性和 保留第一批员工。 目标3.评估与综合个人研究和职业相关的过程和结果 第一批人的发展和指导计划。

PROJECT SUMMARY We will apply a systems-theory approach that leverages participatory techniques, archival data, and sustainable infrastructure to establish, monitor, and report on The FLORIDA-FIRST BRIGADE. Traditional system-theory approaches with cutting-edge participatory approaches and common element themes in concert with the Coordination and Evaluation Center (CEC) to collect data that benefits the participants in The FLORIDA-FIRST BRIGADE, informs the FSU community, and leads to a more diverse and productive scientific community. The purpose of the evaluation will be to carry out an innovative formative (process) and summative (outcome) approaches to monitoring and reporting on the FLORIDA-FIRST BRIGADE. Recent research on the evaluation of collaborative health-science centers finds that for (1) an evaluation to be successful, all stakeholders must have significant engagement, participation, and commitment to the evaluation; (2) include a comprehensive logic model; and (3) include participation of the evaluator in leadership and core meetings to facilitate continuous feedback. The Evaluation Core will meet these recommendations and be responsible for monitoring inputs, resources, and activities; identifying implementation difficulties; and assessing the effectiveness of function activities in attaining the specific aims of the FLORIDA-FIRST BRIGADE. The evaluation will focus on assessing the implementation of short- and long-term goals while providing quarterly rapid cycle evaluations to maximize growth opportunities during the funding period. The evaluation will document program integrity, monitor progress, and provide feedback to The FLORIDA-FIRST BRIGADE leadership and the CEC. The Overall, Administrative, and Faculty Cores each have specific aims and stated timelines to meet these aims. The evaluation will continuously evaluate progress towards meeting these aims and provide program leadership with timely assessments to support quality improvement and programmatic change. The Evaluation Core will focus on assessing three specific aims: Aim 1. Assess the quality and impact of changes to the tenure and promotion process for 6 UMR faculty (FIRST Cohort) in research centers and/or laboratories instead of traditional academic departments. Aim 2. Assess the level or coordination and collaboration among the Office of Human Resources and the Office of Faculty Development and Advancement, associated with addressing diversity, equity, inclusion, and retention for The FIRST Cohort. Aim 3. Assess the process and outcomes associated with the integrated individual research and career development, and mentoring plans for The FIRST Cohort.