The Ethics of Fragile X Genetic Screening and Testing Across the Lifespan

整个生命周期中脆性 X 基因筛查和测试的伦理

• 批准号: 7628999
• 负责人: Kruti Acharya
• 金额: $ 14.43万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2008
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2008-07-01 至 2013-03-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/7628999
• 关键词: Address; Adult; Advocacy; Advocate; Affect; Age; Age of Onset; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Area; Attitude; Award; Behavioral; Belief; Benefits and Risks; Caucasians; Caucasoid Race; Child; Childhood; Clinical; Communities; Complex; Consensus; Counseling; Data; Detection; Development; Development Plans; Developmental Delay Disorders; Developmental Disabilities; Diagnosis; Diagnostic; Diagnostic tests; Disclosure; Disease; Ethical Issues; Ethics; Evaluation; FXTAS; Family; Family member; Fragile X Syndrome; Future; General Population; Genes; Genetic; Genetic Risk; Genetic Screening; Genetic screening method; Genotype; Geography; Goals; Guidelines; Health; Heterogeneity; Individual; Inherited; Internal Medicine; Internist; Interview; Investigation; Knowledge; Lead; Literature; Longevity; Medical Ethics; Menopause; Mental Retardation; Methodology; Minority; Modeling; Mutation; Nature; Neonatal Screening; Neurologist; Parents; Patient Care; Patients; Pattern; Pediatrics; Perimenopause; Phenotype; Physician' s Practice Patterns; Physicians; Policies; Policy Developments; Policy Maker; Population; Practice Guidelines; Premature Ovarian Failure; Primary Care Physician; Principal Investigator; Problem behavior; Publishing; Qualifying; Relative (related person); Research; Research Personnel; Research Project Grants; Risk; Sampling; School-Age Population; Screening Result; Screening procedure; Specialist; Surveys; Symptoms; Testing; Training; Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome; Woman; behavior test; career; career development; clinical care; clinical practice; developmental disease; disease phenotype; experience; follow-up; high risk; instrument; lifetime risk; medical specialties; pediatrician; pleiotropism; pregnant; prenatal; prenatal testing; programs; reproductive; skills; social stigma; socioeconomics; sound; uptake

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): My long-term career goal is to develop an ethical framework to guide both clinicians and policy-makers regarding the genetic screening and testing of behavioral and developmental disorders. Because of my training in Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, Developmental Disabilities, and Medical Ethics, I am uniquely qualified to pursue this goal and to become an independent investigator in this field. The career development plans outlined in this K23 application will enhance the training and experience I have had to date and will provide additional guidance and focus to hone my skills. The genetic diagnosis of behavioral and developmental disorders is ethically complex because 1) these are life-span disorders with variable age of symptom onset; 2) they challenge the traditional Mendelian paradigm in which a single genotype correlates with a single disease phenotype; and 3) the diagnosis or its possibility often carry significant social stigma for the individual and the family. Proposed screening programs for Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), the most common cause of inherited mental retardation (MR), highlight the significant ethical challenges of diagnosing a condition when the meaning of a genotype varies across the lifespan. The FMR-1 gene is pleiotropic, causing more than one clinically-unrelated condition. Full mutations in the gene lead to FXS with child-onset MR and serious behavioral problems. Premutations cause premature ovarian failure and Fragile X Tremor Ataxia Syndrome in adults. Existing data about FMR-1 diagnostic strategies have largely ignored the complexities of pleiotropy. Therefore, there is no current consensus about who should be tested, what information should be disclosed to patients before testing and after a positive result, and the nature of a carriers' obligation to disclose their diagnosis to family members. In order to inform arguments for and against proposed screening programs and diagnostic testing guidelines, I will perform a comprehensive assessment about the risks and benefits of FMR-1 carrier diagnosis. Using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, I will examine the attitudes of primary stakeholders towards Fragile X newborn screening and FMR-1 carrier detection across the lifespan, and how the diverse meanings of the diagnosis influence decisions about familial disclosure. The results of the proposed research will be used to develop an R01 application examining the lifetime risks and benefits of carrying a genetic diagnosis for these conditions.

描述(由申请人提供)：我的长期职业目标是建立一个伦理框架，指导临床医生和政策制定者对行为和发育障碍的基因筛查和测试。由于我在内科、儿科学、发育障碍和医学伦理学方面的培训，我唯一有资格追求这一目标并成为该领域的独立研究员。这份K23申请表中概述的职业发展计划将加强我迄今的培训和经验，并将提供额外的指导和重点来磨练我的技能。行为和发育障碍的基因诊断在伦理上是复杂的，因为1)这些是症状起病年龄不同的终生障碍；2)它们挑战了传统的孟德尔范式，在这种范式中，单一的基因型与单一的疾病表型相关；3)诊断或其可能性往往给个人和家庭带来重大的社会耻辱。脆性X综合征(FXS)是遗传性智力低下(MR)的最常见原因，拟议的筛查计划突显了当一种基因的含义在一生中变化时诊断一种疾病的重大伦理挑战。FMR-1基因是多效性的，导致不止一种临床无关的疾病。该基因的完全突变导致FXS儿童发病的MR和严重的行为问题。预突变导致成人卵巢早衰和脆性X震颤共济失调综合征。现有的关于FMR-1诊断策略的数据在很大程度上忽略了多效性的复杂性。因此，对于应该对谁进行检测，在检测之前和检测结果呈阳性后应该向患者披露哪些信息，以及携带者向家人披露诊断结果的义务的性质，目前还没有达成共识。为了支持和反对拟议的筛查计划和诊断检测指南，我将对FMR-1携带者诊断的风险和好处进行全面评估。我将使用定性和定量的方法，研究主要利益相关者在整个生命周期内对脆性X新生儿筛查和FMR-1携带者检测的态度，以及诊断的不同含义如何影响关于家族披露的决定。拟议的研究结果将用于开发一个R01应用程序，检查对这些疾病进行基因诊断的终生风险和好处。