Patients' Recall and Assessment of Mechanical Ventilation: Impact of Sedation

患者对机械通气的回忆和评估：镇静的影响

• 批准号: 7574528
• 负责人: Jill Guttormson
• 金额: $ 3.1万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2008
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2008-04-15 至 2011-04-14
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/7574528
• 关键词: Activities of Daily Living; Address; Affect; Agitation; Analgesics; Anesthetics; Anxiety; Awareness; Caring; Chronic; Client satisfaction; Cognition; Critical Care; Critical Illness; Data; Delirium; Disease; Dose; Effectiveness; Evaluation; Frequencies; Fright; Goals; Health Personnel; Illness impact; Individual; Intensive Care Units; Intervention; Interview; Knowledge; Lead; Length; Life; Long Term Survivorship; Measures; Mechanical ventilation; Medical; Memory; Muscle Weakness; NIH Program Announcements; National Institute of Nursing Research; Outcome; Outcome Study; Patient Self-Report; Patients; Pattern; Persons; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders; Public Health; Quality of life; Recovery; Research; Sedation procedure; Symptoms; Time; Tube; United States; Ventilator; Weaning; Work; base; depression; design; endotracheal; environmental intervention; evidence base; experience; health related quality of life; improved; innovation; meetings; multilevel analysis; psychologic; satisfaction; sedative; symptom management

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Mechanically ventilated patients experience multiple physical and psychological symptoms including discomfort from the endotracheal tube; fear regarding recovery, and altered cognition. The majority of patients receive sedative medications to reduce symptoms. Although sedation may be indicated at times, it is associated with multiple adverse outcomes such as post traumatic stress disorder, depression, muscle weakness, and prolonged time on the ventilator. Physical and psychological difficulties can continue for years after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge impacting quality of life and ability to resume work. Changes in practice have lagged behind evidence of the harm of excess sedation. Studies of sedation and patient outcomes after mechanical ventilation have focused on time on the ventilator, length of ICU stay, and psychological and physical sequela. The effectiveness of sedation for symptom management during mechanical ventilation has not been evaluated with patient self report. Furthermore, few studies have assessed the impact of the pattern of sedation relying instead on cumulative sedative dose or average level of sedation. Consistent with the National Institute of Nursing Research goals for improving management of symptoms and health related quality of life during critical illness and recovery, the long term goal of this research is improvement of symptom management during mechanical ventilation to promote patient comfort and minimize short and long term complications of critical illness. The objectives of the proposed research are to describe the relationship between patients' assessment of mechanical ventilation and sedation patterns over the course of mechanical ventilation and to identify non-pharmacologic interventions that mechanically ventilated patients find effective for symptom amelioration. The proposed correlational study will use multilevel modeling to describe the pattern of sedation during mechanical ventilation and its relationship to patient recall and assessment of the experience. Assessment of mechanical ventilation will be measured by completion of three scales and checklists that provide a global evaluation of the subjects' experiences determine presence of specific memories; and evaluate the perceived benefits of nonpharmacologic interventions. Sedative medication data will be collected during the subject's ICU stay. Patient assessment data will be collected during in-person interviews conducted after ICU discharge. This study will assess the value of common interventions to reduce symptoms associated with mechanical ventilation. The knowledge gained from this study has significant public health implications for patients receiving ventilatory support in the United States-improving symptom management and recovery.

描述（由申请人提供）：机械通气患者会出现多种生理和心理症状，包括气管插管不适、对恢复的恐惧和认知改变。大多数患者接受镇静药物以减轻症状。虽然有时可能需要镇静，但它与多种不良后果有关，如创伤后应激障碍、抑郁、肌无力和呼吸机使用时间延长。在重症监护室（ICU）出院后，身体和心理困难可能持续多年，影响生活质量和恢复工作的能力。实践中的变化落后于过量镇静危害的证据。对机械通气后镇静和患者结局的研究主要集中在呼吸机使用时间、ICU住院时间以及心理和生理后遗症。尚未通过患者自我报告评估机械通气期间镇静对症状管理的有效性。此外，很少有研究评估依赖于累积镇静剂量或平均镇静水平的镇静模式的影响。与国家护理研究所在危重病和恢复期间改善症状管理和健康相关生活质量的目标一致，本研究的长期目标是改善机械通气期间的症状管理，以提高患者舒适度并最大限度地减少危重病的短期和长期并发症。拟议研究的目的是描述患者在机械通气过程中对机械通气和镇静模式的评估之间的关系，并确定机械通气患者发现有效改善症状的非药物干预措施。拟议的相关性研究将使用多层次模型来描述机械通气期间的镇静模式及其与患者回忆和经验评估的关系。将通过完成三个量表和检查表来评估机械通气，这些量表和检查表提供了对受试者经历的总体评价，确定了特定记忆的存在;并评价了非药物干预的感知获益。将在受试者入住ICU期间收集镇静药物数据。患者评估数据将在ICU出院后进行的面对面访谈期间收集。本研究将评估常见干预措施对减少机械通气相关症状的价值。从这项研究中获得的知识对在美国接受治疗支持的患者具有重要的公共卫生意义-改善症状管理和恢复。