Structural Racism and Disparities in Social Risk, Human Capital, Health Care Resources, and Health Outcomes: A Multi-level Analysis of Pathways and Policy Levers for Change

结构性种族主义和社会风险、人力资本、医疗保健资源和健康结果的差异：变革路径和政策杠杆的多层次分析

• 批准号: 10654440
• 负责人: Leonard E. Egede
• 金额: $ 63.95万
• 依托单位: MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2023
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2023-05-13 至 2026-12-31
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10654440
• 关键词: Address; Area; Charge; Code; Color; Communities; Complex; Data; Data Sources; Discrimination; Disparity; Ensure; Equation; Event; Exposure to; Federal Government; Fostering; Goals; Government; Health; Health Care Costs; Healthcare; Hispanic; Home; Hospital Closures; Housing; Individual; Inequity; Insurance; Investments; Knowledge; Legal; Link; Local Government; Maps; Measurement; Medicaid; Medical; Methods; Modeling; Neighborhoods; Outcome; Pathway Analysis; Pathway interactions; Police; Policies; Residual state; Resources; Risk; Risk Factors; Safety; Schools; Security; Societies; State Government; Statutes and Laws; Structural Racism; System; Time; Wages; cost; disparity gap; disparity reduction; economic disparity; economic need; ethnic disparity; ethnic minority; evidence base; food insecurity; health care service utilization; health disparity; health outcome disparity; housing instability; human capital; implementation strategy; improved; innovation; machine learning method; mortality; multilevel analysis; novel; poor health outcome; programs; racial disparity; racial minority population; skills; social; social health determinants; voucher

Project Summary/Abstract Structural racism, the ways in which societies foster discrimination through mutually reinforcing inequitable systems, has emerged as an important social risk factor and contributor to poor health outcomes for ethnic minorities (Egede 2020, Bailey 2017, Paradies 2015). An important component of structural racism that has been inadequately studied is historic redlining. Historic redlining refers to the previously legal practice (initiated in 1934 by the Federal Housing Administration) of systematically denying credit access and insurance for borrowers in neighborhoods that were economically disadvantaged and that were inhabited by primarily racial minority groups (Richardson 2020, Rothstein 2017). While explicit redlining is now prohibited under the Fair Housing Act of 1968, the residual effects of residential redlining ensures that the same areas with exposure to historic structural racism are to this day disproportionately inhabited by residents that are unduly subject to worse social risk factors (defined across: Housing Instability; Food Insecurity; Transport Needs; Economic Needs; and Safety), lower human capital (defined as the totality of individuals’ knowledge and skills), and lower health care resources (defined as the medical resource capabilities of areas which enable them to handle broad and complex medical events/cases) (Brillioux 2017, Bailey 2021, Hidalgo 2021); and that redlining may present an important link between historic structural racism and present day disparities in health outcomes (defined across: mortality, health care cost, health care utilization) (Egede 2020). The goal of this project is to inform our understanding of the pathways between structural racism (defined as historic redlining), social risk factors, human capital, health care resources and health outcomes; and to evaluate policies that can help reduce the impact of structural racism on health disparities. The present study will accomplish this objective by using recently developed causal and interpretable machine learning methods, structural equation modelling, counterfactual analysis, along with stakeholder engagement, to address four aims: 1) Examine the relationship between regional exposure to structural racism (defined as: historic redlining) and present-day social risk factors, human capital, and health care resources. 2) Examine the direct and indirect effects of regional exposure to structural racism on health outcomes via social risk, human capital, and healthcare resources. 3) Assess policy levers of federal, state, and regional governments that can be used to reduce area vulnerabilities to historic structural racism, and that can reduce present-day health outcomes disparities. 4) Engage a diverse set of key stakeholders to identify and prioritize strategies for mitigating social risk, building human capital, and improving health care resources and outcomes for regions exposed to structural racism through historical redlining. The study is innovative in: (i) its examination of the linkages between structural racism and health outcomes, (ii) in its measurement of health care resources, and (iii) in its emphasis on identifying policy channels for reducing the perpetual impact of structural racism.

项目总结/文摘