Choosing Immune Suppression in Renal Transplantation by Efficacy and Morbidity

点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Kidney transplant (KTx) professionals have many choices of immunosuppressive (IS) medications and regimens for their patients. With early acute rejection (AR) rates now low and short term graft survival high, individualized long-term graft survival depends on patients' underlying co-morbidities or complications of IS medications. Yet few studies or data exist on how to balance the trade-offs between IS efficacy (in preventing AR) versus complications, including infections, cancers and new onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT). Randomized trials or FDA-sanctioned Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies help with very specific situations; but along with prior analyses of large national databases, also have many limitations. In this study, we propose to use a novel, three-database linkage of the a) U.S.A. national Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) registry: recording initial data on all KTx and subsequent survival outcomes, b) a Medicare billing claims database: covers the first 3 years post-KTx, and c) a national Pharmacy Clearinghouse Database (PCD) that covers 60% of all medication fills in the U.S.A. Using this integration, we can minimize limitations of prior approaches to develop accurate, longitudinal, national level data on the transplant procedures, IS use, survival and non-fatal morbidity. Our investigative team of KTx specialists, economists and statisticians, all with transplant database and outcomes research expertise, can then assess in a more rigorous way than previously possible, the efficacy and morbidity tradeoffs of the IS regimens and doses. In the proposed CISTEM study (Choosing Immune Suppression in Renal Transplantation by Efficacy and Morbidity), we will complete the following three aims: 1) To construct a novel linkage of data from the OPTN registry, an updated Medicare claims dataset and the PCD to quantify the associations of KTx IS with outcome metrics of efficacy and morbidity, adjusted for demographic, medical and immunologic parameters; through propensity-score and covariate-adjusted survival models that will quantify the association between IS regimen or dose and specific measures of efficacy (AR) or morbidity (major infections, cancers, NODAT) that contribute to the hard outcomes of graft survival and patient survival, with sub-analyses for key racial and high-risk subgroups; 2) To use the transition probabilities of events, generated in aim 1, to develop Markov models and calculate the overall cost-effectiveness, including trade-off costs, for each of the major IS regimens in use, by overall group and in the key sub-groups mentioned above; and 3) To use the decision analytics from Aims 1 and 2 to generate individualized and real-time reports of the predicted efficacy/complications outcomes and costs of different KTx IS regimens through a free and updateable patient-focused web- or mobile phone-based risk engine and communication tool. The long-term significance is that physicians and patients will be able to make IS choices in a more cost-effective and better informed manner than any other strategy currently available.